Case law

State of Or. v. City of Rajneeshpuram

598 F. Supp. 1208 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 12, 1984

Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947). … Defendants rely in *1216 part on Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, 450 U.S. 707 , 101 S.Ct. 1425 , 67 L.Ed.2d 624 (1981), and Sherbert v.

The Estate of Beverly Ann Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 25, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON THE ESTATE OF BEVERLY ANN 3:19-cv-01351-MC BROWN, … Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v.

Ahern v. Gaussoin

611 F. Supp. 1465 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 10, 1985

In Federal Bank, I compared the plaintiffs’ injury to that allegedly suffered by the plaintiffs in Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 508 , 509, 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983). … See, e.g., Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d at 1353 . Nexus with organized crime Plaintiffs need not show a nexus with organized crime in order to sustain their RICO claims. Willamette Savings & Loan v.

The Estate of Beverly Ann Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 15, 2021

Hill v. Astrue, 698 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Sandgathe v. Chater, 108 F.3d 978, 980 (9th Cir. 1997)). … Davis v. Heckler, 868 F.2d 323, 326 (9th Cir. 1989) (citing Martinez v. Heckler, 807 F.2d 771, 772 (9th Cir. 1986)).

Allstate Insurance v. Browning

598 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 1983

See also, Nielsen v. St. Paul Cos., 283 Or. 277 , 583 P.2d 545 (1978). … Even though coverage is excluded under the policy, Allstate may still have a duty to defend the Brownings, if withdrawal would prejudice Brownings. United Pacific Insurance v.

Dacosta v. NOVARTIS AG, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.

242 F. Supp. 2d 765 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2002

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … In Smith v. Sandoz Ltd., No. 1:95-cv-3S89-MHS (N.D.

Steffler v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 4, 2023

If a prisoner meets this burden, the Board then converts the sentence to life with the possibility of release to parole, post-prison supervision, or work release. See ORS 163.105; Barrett v. … See Steffler v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 314 Or. App. 494, 495 P.3d 218 (2021) (citing State v. Myers, 218 Or. App. 635, 180 P.3d 759 (2008) and Pitchforth v. Board of Parole, 302 Or.

Frei v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 12, 2025

of Parole (“the Board”) considered Frei’s parole eligibility. … See Olsen v.

Union Pacific Railroad v. Runyon

320 F.R.D. 245 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 8, 2017

Washington v. Wash. … E.E.O.C. v.

McMellon v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

945 F. Supp. 1402 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 1996

McMellon made a telephone report to the Oregon Board of Pharmacy on June 20,1994. … In Lusk v.

Palmer v. University Medical Group

973 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 21, 1997

In Bruch v. … Brown v.

Gabbard v. Linn-Benton Housing Authority

219 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2002

Brown, 42 F.3d 434 (7th Cir.1994); Brown v. Shalala, 15 F.3d 97 (8th Cir.1994); Coffin v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 20 F.Supp.2d 107 (D.Me.1998); Coffey v. County of Hennepin, 23 F.Supp.2d 1081 (D.Minn.1998); Comber v. … Brown’s testimony. First, as defendants themselves concede, Dr. Brown may testify as plaintiff’s treating physician. Moreover, Dr. Brown may also testify regarding plaintiff’s chemical sensitivity to formaldehyde.

Petrusich v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

984 F. Supp. 2d 1112 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 2013

In Fleet v. … Grant is "Board Certified in Adult Psychiatry and in Child & Adolescent Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology.” AR at 366.

Rossi v. United States

755 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 29, 1990

Plaintiffs cite to United States v. Buford, 889 F.2d 1406 (5th Cir.1989), for support. … Plaintiffs next move to strike Browning’s declaration because of Browning’s failure to include in his declaration a delegation order, a statement of Browning’s authority.

The Almatia

1 F. Cas. 535 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 12, 1868

Brown v. Lull, [Case No. 2,018.] The burden of proof is upon the claimants to show both these things. No attempt has been made to prove either of them. Tried by this test, this stipulation is void. … King, 3 Fed. 302 ; The Paul Revere, 10 Fed. 156 ; Marsland v. The Yosemite, 18 Fed. 331 : Macomber v. Thompson, Case No. 8,919; Sprague v. Kain, Id. 13,250: The Magnet, Id. 8.955; The John Martin, Id. 7,358; Hayes v.

Latif v. Holder

28 F. Supp. 3d 1134 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 24, 2014

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion (# 85) for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion (# 91) for Partial Summary Judgment. … Jifry v.

Thomas v. Harder

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 2023

See Thomas v. … For Brown and Boemmels, Plaintiff asserts that the facts alleged in Paragraphs 96-112 regarding the alleged deficiencies in the Board’s disciplinary findings are facts that apply to Brown and Boemmels.

Harris v. District Court for Southern Indiana

989 F. Supp. 2d 1088 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 14, 2013

Seventh Circuit Brown Exception One potential exception relevant to the pending Petition is recognized by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. 2 In Brown v. … United States v. Smith, 544 F.3d 781, 787 (7th Cir.2008). Therefore, the third Brown element -is met.

Giustina Land & Timber Co., LLC v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 30, 2025

Wood v. … V.

Odoms v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 31, 2020

See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir, 2003) (en banc). … that the board provided the due process protections required under Swarthout v.