Case law

Brown v. Apfel

991 F. Supp. 1232 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 27, 1998

Brown contends that the notices of determination of May 10,1984 and of July 26, 1984 were deficient under Gonzalez v. … Brown has the burden of providing the evidence needed to establish her entitlement to reopen. See Panages v. Bowen, 871 F.2d 91, 93 (9th Cir.1989), citing Kail v.

Tarhuni v. Holder

8 F. Supp. 3d 1253 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 26, 2014

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the following Motions: 1. … Paul v.

United Pacific Insurance v. Brown

240 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 16, 1965

Brown. … City of Myrtle Point v.

United States v. Brown

347 F. Supp. 2d 920 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 19, 2004

Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 404 , 97 S.Ct. 1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977). Courts must examine the totality of circumstances in determining the validity of a waiver. Moran v. … United States v. Betters, 229 F.Supp.2d 1103, 1107 (D.Or.2002).

Brown v. American Mail Line, Ltd.

437 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 15, 1977

On the basis of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. … Swift v. Bolten, 517 F.2d 368 (1975).

Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. Brown

822 F. Supp. 1479 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 1, 1993

See United States v. … Within U.S. v.

United States v. Brown

477 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 4, 1979

S. v. … S. v. Clardy, 540 F.2d 436, at 442 (9th Cir. 1976). Nonetheless, as a general rule, such disclosures are rarely ordered. U. S. v. Clardy, supra; U. S. v. Richter, 488 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1973).

Brown v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

622 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 3, 1985

Brown, brought this action pro se, contending that defendants violated the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 in improperly selling plaintiff a stock option. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages. … Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 719 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948) (emphasis added). Res judicata applies when there is a valid, final judgment on the merits. 18 C. Wright & A.

Brown v. United States

186 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 21, 1960

corpus seeking to be heard upon his contention that the sentence of imprisonment heretofore entered by this Court in the proceedings had on January 29, 1959, in the cause then pending, entitled “United States of America v. … Willie Brown, Defendant, No.

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown

476 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 1, 2007

Before the court are State Defendants’ (Marvin Brown, Oregon State Forester, and members of the Oregon Board of Forestry, Stephen Hobbs, Barbara Craig, Diane Snyder, Larry Giustina, Chris Heffernan, William Hutchison, and … See Newton County Wildlife Ass’n v. Rogers, 141 F.3d 803, 810 (8th Cir.1998); O'Aha ‘Ino v. Galiher, 28 F.Supp.2d 1258, 1261 (D.Hawai'i 1998). Another case, North Carolina Shellfish Growers Ass’n v.

Bryant v. Weintraub, Genshlea, Hardy, Erich & Brown

844 F. Supp. 640 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1994

Hirsch v. Blue Cross, Blue Shield of Kansas City, 800 F.2d 1474, 1477 (9th Cir.1986). … In State ex rel Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v.

Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.

58 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 12, 1944

In Phillips v. … Primeau v. Granfield, 2 Cir., 168 F. 911 . 18 Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Josselyn, 224 Mich. 159 , 194 N. W. 548 ; Moseley v. Fikes, 186 Tex. 386 , 151 S.W.2d 202 ; Long v.

Dulcich, Inc. v. Mayer Brown, LLP

954 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2013

Within a month, on July 18, 2012, Mayer Brown filed a complaint in the Superior Court in the District of Columbia, alleging breach of contract. Mayer Brown LLP v. … Corp. v.

Brown & McCabe, Stevedores, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

232 F. 298 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 11, 1915

Boulton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 29, 2021

See Valentine v. Comm’r Soc. Sec. … (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). C.

Brown v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections

173 F.R.D. 265 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 2, 1997

The court adopts Brown’s proposal. … In Carter-Herman v.

Brown v. State, Department of Corrections

969 F. Supp. 1243 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 8, 1997

Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 105 F.3d 1288, 1302 (9th Cir.1997). … Norwood v. Kirkpatrick, 349 U.S. 29, 32 , 75 S.Ct. 544, 546-47 , 99 L.Ed. 789 (1955).

Edwards v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 25, 2025

BROWN; CAPT. C. BORDEN; SGT. … .”); Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that “the applicable statute of limitations must be tolled while a prisoner completes the mandatory exhaustion process”).

Gardner v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 17, 2025

See Thomas v. … .”); United States v.

Brown v. State of Oregon, Department of Corrections

173 F.R.D. 262 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 26, 1997

Before the court is Brown’s motion to compel discovery (# 42). … Brown alleges causes of action in his complaint based on federal statutes. Federal common law acknowledges a qualified privilege for official information, including government personnel files. Sanchez v.