Case law

Simpson v. Burrows

90 F. Supp. 2d 1108 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 22, 2000

In this tort action by plaintiff V. … See, e.g., Hall v.

(BK) Svenhard's Swedish Bakery v. United States Bakery

District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 29, 2022

The court must draw all 1 This Court also has pending two cases related to this action: Board of Trustees of the Bakery & Confectionery Union & Industry International Pension Fund v. … Ctr. v.

Homedew v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 28, 2019

See Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. … .”); Brown-Hunter v.

Gruber v. Oregon State Bar

District Court, D. Oregon · May 16, 2022

Crowe v. Or. … The Tenth Circuit reviewed the Supreme Court’s holdings in Lathrop v. Donohue, 367 U.S. 820 (1961); Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977); Keller v.

Chloupek

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 30, 2026

Brown- Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015); see Tr. 56–58. … Bray v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 554 F.3d 1219, 1225 (9th Cir. 2009); Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (stating reviewing court is “constrained to review the reasons the ALJ asserts”).

Bunney v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 7, 2019

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489. It is the Commissioner, not the Court, who must make factual findings in the first instance. Arkansas v.

Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Gutierrez

442 F. Supp. 2d 1096 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 7, 2006

To qualify prior to Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … See Davis v.

Shaver Transportation Co. v. United States

948 F. Supp. 2d 1193 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 5, 2013

The contractor may later challenge the contracting officer’s decision by appealing it to an agency board and then to the Federal Circuit, id. at §§ 7104(a) & 7107(a), or by bringing an action directly in the U.S. … See Clean Giant, Inc. v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 390, 392-93 (1990); Thomas Funding Corp. v.

Moret

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 18, 2025

Woodford v. … Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that the PLRA does not require exhaustion when administrative remedies are “effectively unavailable”); Brown v.

Coe v. United States

502 F. Supp. 881 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 19, 1980

Boards on which signs can be posted have been constructed here and there on the property. … In Dobkins v.

United States v. Polonio

77 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 1, 1941

In the case of Forte v. United States, 68 App.D.C. Ill, 94 F.2d 236 , 127 A.L.R. 1120 , the question of corroboration of a confession arose. There, also, a mental operation was involved. … Although this ease was before the Supreme Court in Forte v.

Backes v. Bernhardt

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 24, 2020

Plaintiffs George Backes and Rick Barclay bring this cause of action challenging the final decision of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Internal Board of Land Appeals (IBLA), which found Plaintiffs in violation … E/ Rescate Legal Servs., Inc. v. Exec. Office of Immigration Review, 959 F.2d 742, 753 (9th Cir. 1991) (internal quotations omitted). See also Or. Nat. Res. Council v.

United States v. Loud Hawk

564 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 20, 1983

Dickey v. … See Brown v. Wolff, 706 F.2d 902 at 906 (9th Cir.1983) (crowded docket not good cause for continuance of Interstate Agreement on Detainers case).

University Accounting Service, LLC v. Schulton

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 20, 2020

Stephen Nakamura, MERLE BROWN & NAKAMURA PC, 90 Broad Street, Suite 2201, New York, NY 10004; John C. Rothermich, K&L GATES LLP, One SW Columbia Street, Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97258; G. … See, e.g., Roberts v.

Close-Smith v. Conley

230 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 20, 1964

Briggs were licensed, as a joint venture, by the Contractors License Board of the State of California, for the purpose of submitting a bid to the Department of Public Works of that state to do certain work on its Highway … The said association thereafter being known as Briggs-Conley-Dennis, a licensee of the Contractors License Board of California, the same being the joint venture subsequently herein mentioned.

Cole v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 2024

Br, ECF No. 13 at 10 (citing Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … And the Court “will not fault the agency merely for explaining its decision with ‘less than ideal clarity.’ ” Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (quoting Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.

Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.

445 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 4, 2006

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (# 101) Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint. … Co. v. Serv-Well Furn. Co., 806 F.2d 1393 , 1401 (9th Cir.1986). See also Reddy v. Litton Indus., 912 F.2d 291 (9th Cir.1990).

Brummett v. United States

218 F. Supp. 2d 1253 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 15, 2002

Department of Labor’s Worker’s Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) ruled the U.S. … E.g., PALA, Inc., v.

Cozine v. Crabtree

15 F. Supp. 2d 997 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 2, 1998

Clark v. … “[A]n across-the-board prohibition [on granting credit against both the federal and state sentences] under all circumstances would lead to illogical results.” United States v.

Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Quickturn Design Systems, Inc.

999 F. Supp. 1388 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 15, 1997

Quicktum argues that under this interpretation a logic board which includes interconnects which are connected only to other interconnects, not to any logic chip, is covered by the claim language, because those interconnects … Texas Instruments v.