Case law

Wills v. Bank of New York Mellon

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 30, 2022

Simon v. … McKithen v. Brown, 481 F.3d 89, 97 (2nd Cir. 2007). A dismissal under this doctrine generally is without 2 The Rooker-Feldman doctrine takes its name from Rooker v. Fidelity Tr.

United States v. Brooks

164 F.R.D. 501 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 28, 1995

Blake v. Pallan, 554 F.2d 947, 954 (9th Cir.1977); Sagebrush Rebellion, Inc. v. Watt, 713 F.2d 525, 528 (9th Cir.1983). … Reich v.

Bell v. Salazar

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 20, 2020

Valdivia-Flores, 876 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2017), and U.S. v. … Brown, 879 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2018), establish that the petitioner’s Washington State controlled substance conviction is an invalid

Masters v. City of Rainier

238 F. 827 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 8, 1917

So in Hitchcock v. … All the principles involved in this case are substantially and ably treated in the case of Board of Com’rs v. Platt, 79 Fed. 567 , 25 C. C. A. 87 , and the reasoning there applied is manifestly decisive of this.

Akwenuke v. American Airlines

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 30, 2024

See Snead v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 237 F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th Cir. 2001); Clark v. Safeway, Inc., 478 F. Supp. 3d 1080, 1093 (D. … On the contrary, the evidence in the record shows that Delaney ultimately upgraded plaintiff's seat at the boarding gate.

United States v. Abarza

199 F. Supp. 3d 1270 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2016

United States v. Washington, 490 F.3d 765, 776-77 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)). … See United States v. Lundin, 817 F.3d 1151, 1159 , (9th Cir.2016) ("the front porch of a home is the 'classic exemplar' of curtilage”) (quoting Florida v.

Cartwright v. Oregon Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 12, 2023

Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1107 (9th Cir. 1999) (citation omitted); see also Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010). … See Pet’r Response to PPS Board Att. 1 at 2 (ECF No. 25-1).

Mills v. Keep

197 F. 360 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 24, 1912

Belmont Bank v. Hoge, 35 N. Y. 65 . … Stewart v. Lansing, 104 U. S. 505 , 26 L. Ed. 866 ; American Exchange Nat. Bank v. Oregon Pottery Co. (C. C.) 55 Fed. 265, 266 .

Weigel v. MV Belgrano

189 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 14, 1960

See Hagans v. … [(Seas Shipping Co. v.

Zea v. West State, Inc.

61 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 25, 1999

Co. v. … See Abbott v. Louisiana Ins.

Keele v. Oxford Shipping Co.

553 F. Supp. 994 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 5, 1983

In a subsequent case, Bueno v. … Peacock v. Board of Regents, 597 F.2d 163, 165 (9th Cir.1979). It is not proper to grant a new trial because the court might have reached a different result from the jury’s. Wilhelm v.

Sereno-Morales v. Cascade Food Inc.

819 F. Supp. 2d 1148 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 12, 2011

See Chao v. … Chuang v. Univ. of Cal. Davis Board of Trustees, 225 F.3d 1115, 1123 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted).

Toohey v. WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORP. HEALTH & WELFARE

727 F. Supp. 2d 978 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 26, 2010

Co. v. … V.

Wahab v. Wahab

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 5, 2024

See Conerly v. … Brown v. J.C.

Manning

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 25, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Burrell v. Colvin, 775 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2014)). … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2017) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted).

Oregon JV LLC v. Advance Investment Corp

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 22, 2023

BROWN OLSON, Trustee of the Margaret J. Brown Trust; JOHN M. COMPTON, BETTY COMPTON, KURT D. … (quoting Goodyear Dunlap Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).

Goddard v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 2023

Reply, ECF No. 21 at 10-11 (citing Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … And the Court “will not fault the agency merely for explaining its decision with ‘less than ideal clarity.’ ” Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (quoting Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.

Odoms v. Kelly

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 2020

EUGENE DIVISION DONALD ODOMS, Petitioner, No. 6:18-cv-00125-AC BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent OPINTON AND ORDER Oregon State Penitentiary; and OREGON BOARD … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F. & R.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.

897 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 25, 1995

Brown v. Portland Sch. Dist. # 1, 291 Or. 77, 84 , 628 P.2d 1183 (1981). Intent must be expressed by a ‘clear, unequivocal and decisive act.’ Id. (citation omitted). … Co. v.

Reinsch v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 25, 2023

Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (emphasis in original) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489 (quoting Burrell v.