Case law

Bixby v. KBR, Inc.

895 F. Supp. 2d 1075 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 13, 2012

See, e.g., Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Warren v. … History of the Parties’ Dispute Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc. (“KB & RS”) entered into Contract No. DACA63-03-D-0005 — known as the “Restore Iraqi Oil” or “RIO” contract — with the U.S.

Wilson v. Decibels Of Oregon, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 2019

The Matthew Wilson case involved the same attorneys as the present case and, with the exception of Leo Brown, was directed against the same defendants as the present case. … Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984); United States v. $28,000 in U.S. Currency, 802 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir. 2015).

Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Lohn

522 F. Supp. 2d 1295 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 9, 2007

Clark v. … The Ninth Circuit explained: A preliminary injunction issued by a judge carries all the “judicial imprimatur” necessary to satisfy Buckhannon [Board and Care Home, Inc. v.

Friends of the Wild Swan, Inc. v. Thorson

260 F. Supp. 3d 1338 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 1, 2017

See Desoto v. … But, in Coos County Board of County Commissioners v.

Metropolis Holdings, LLC v. SP Plus Corporation

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 29, 2021

Yeager v. Bowlin, 693 F.3d 1076, 1080 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech., 577 F.3d 989, 998 (9th Cir. 2009)). … See, e.g., Welles v. Turner Ent.

East Cascade Women's Group, P.C. v. Tutthill

216 F. Supp. 2d 1159 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2002

ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (# 24) on May 1, 2002, in which she recommended this Court grant Defendant Roxanne L. … Compare Gomez v.

Gillis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 13, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, F.3d at 494.

United States Nat. Bank of Portland v. United States

188 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 30, 1960

The plaintiff cites Iltz v. Krieger, 104 Or. 59 , 202 P. 409 , 206 P. 550 ; In re Potter’s Estate, 154 Or. 167 , 59 P.2d 253 ; Brown v. Miles, 193 Or. 466 , 238 P.2d 761 ; and Jenning v. … In Fick v.

Robins v. Scholastic Book Fairs

928 F. Supp. 1027 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 13, 1996

Board of Education, 611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir.1979)), remanded on other grounds, 461 U.S. 952 , 103 S.Ct. 2421 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1983). … Delta Air Lines, 676 F.2d 1240 , 1244 (9th Cir.1982) (quoting Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624, 639 (6th Cir.1979)); see also, Burt v.

Lewis v. Maritime Overseas Corporation

163 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 6, 1958

Immediately upon boarding the ship, libelant and his fellow longshoremen engaged upon rigging the ship for heavy lifts. … Seas Shipping Co. v.

Good George LLC v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 15, 2021

June 25, 2020) (court took judicial notice of pandemic-related announcements by Governor Brown); Molina v. Washington Mut. … Von Saher v.

Rollins v. McMinnville School District 040

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 27, 2021

Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112, 124. Under Oregon law, school boards have general final policymaking authority for school districts. … V.

McCune v. Oregon Senior Services Division

643 F. Supp. 1444 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 9, 1986

United States v. Diebold, 369 U.S. 654, 655 , 82 S.Ct. 993, 994 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962). Where different ultimate inferences can be drawn, summary judgment is inappropriate. Sankovich v. … Bowe v. Judson C. Burns, Inc., 137 F.2d 37, 39 (3d Cir.1943); see also, Lorillard, Inc. v. Pons, 434 U.S. 575, 581 , 98 S.Ct. 866, 870 , 55 L.Ed.2d 40 (1978) (collecting cases).

Shaw v. R.U. One Corp.

822 F. Supp. 2d 1094 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 30, 2011

See Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or. 597, 611-12 , 588 P.2d 1087 (1978). … See Hess v.

Mississippi Productions, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 15, 2021

Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., 899 F.3d 988, 998 (9th Cir. 2018); Lee v. … June 25, 2020) (court took judicial notice of pandemic-related announcements by Governor Brown); Molina v. Washington Mut. Bank, No. 09-CV-00894-IEG (AJB), 2010 WL 431439, at *3 (S.D. Cal.

Tozer v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 2023

Therefore, the entries for media contact are reduced by 50% across the board. … Brown, No. 3:12-CV-00138-ST, 2016 WL, 589684 (D. Or. Feb. 11, 2016) (class action). Further, the Court finds that Mr.

Delker v. Maass

843 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 2, 1994

McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1060 (9th Cir.1992) (citing Shapley v. Nevada Board of State Prison Comm’rs, 766 F.2d 404, 407 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam)). The delay need not cause permanent injury. Id. … See, e.g., Bunnell v.

Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

395 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 17, 2005

Scott requested a review of the ALJ’s decision by the Workers’ Compensation Board. That review is still pending. … Stanich v.

Valentine v. Equifax Information Services LLC

543 F. Supp. 2d 1232 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 22, 2008

Tahara v. Matson Terminals, Inc., 511 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir.2007); see also Staton v. Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 938, 965 (9th Cir.2003). … I find that because plaintiff emphasized her punitive damages claim but was unsuccessful in obtaining relief on that claim, an across-the-board reduction of the lodestar is appropriate.

Fial

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 15, 2025

Ass’n des Eleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Quebec v. Harris, 729 F.3d 937, 943 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Coal. to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir. 2012)) (internal quotations omitted). … Brown, 902 F.3d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). Plaintiff alleges the following injury due to Or. Rev. Stat. § 107.105(1)(f) as the basis of standing: “loss of property to his ex-spouse.”