Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
0.85s
United States v. State of Oregon Water Resources Department
774 F. Supp. 1568 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 30, 1991
In United States v. … Withrow v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedParks v. Lake Oswego School District
District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 25, 2024
Plaintiff John Parks (“Parks”) brings this action against Defendants Lake Oswego School District (the “District”), Lake Oswego School Board (the “Board”),1 Marshall Haskins 1 The Court refers to the District and the Board … (Pickering v. Board of Education AND Kennedy v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Aug 6, 2026
See ECF No. 13 (citing ORS 421.508(4); Gaynor v. Board of Parole, 165 Or. … Additionally, he cites an Oregon regulation, OAR 255-075-0079, and an Oregon court case, Gaynor v. Board of Parole, 165 Or. App. 609 (2000). Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBartelamia v. U.S. Bank National Association
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 6, 2024
See Peters v. … Barnes v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Feb 17, 2022
STATE OF OREGON; KATE BROWN, Defendants. … Partners v. Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 665 (9th Cir. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknown211 F.R.D. 411 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 8, 2002
Sperling v. … Brown v. Prince Georges County Health Dept. 1992 WL 142694 , *3-4, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8728 , *9 (1992). The complaint should set forth the approximate dates on which the alleged events occurred.
Cited 45 timesPublishedUnited States v. Izguerra-Robles
660 F. Supp. 2d 1202 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 14, 2009
See United States v. … See United States v. Washington, 490 F.3d 765, 776-77 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975)). The government bears the burden to show admissibility. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLucht v. Molalla River School District
57 F. Supp. 2d 1060 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 25, 1999
Id at 758; accord Beth V. by Yvonne V. v. … Brown v. Griggsville Community Unit Sch. Dist. No. 4, 12 F.3d 681 , 683 (7th Cir.1993).
Cited 2 timesPublished195 F. Supp. 3d 1170 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 20, 2016
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS (#712, #741) TO SUPPRESS FACEBOOK EVIDENCE BROWN, Judge. … United States v. Flores, 802 F.3d 1028, 1043 (9th Cir.2015)(quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).
Cited 0 timesPublished969 F. Supp. 1240 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 4, 1997
Plaintiffs object to using any formula except the proportionate liability method utilized in Franklin v. Kaypro Corp., 884 F.2d 1222 (9th Cir.1989). … The opinion in Knapp was issued the day before a different Ninth Circuit panel issued its opinion in DCD Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton, 90 F.3d 1442 (9th Cir.1996).
Cited 0 timesPublished755 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 17, 1991
Refugees v. INS, 795 F.2d 1434, 1441 (9th Cir.1986). … Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. at 414 , 94 S.Ct. at 1812 , rev’d in part, Thornburgh v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAss'n of Western Pulp and Paper Workers v. Boise Cascade Corp.
644 F. Supp. 183 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 11, 1986
The Union has also filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Both matters are pending. … Oliver v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co., 53 Or.App. 604 , 632 P.2d 1295, 1298 , rev. denied, 292 Or. 108 , 642 P.2d 310 (1981).
Cited 5 timesPublishedMagallon v. Robert Half International, Inc.
311 F.R.D. 625 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 10, 2015
See Brown v. … See Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No. C 11-03082 LB, 2014 WL 6483216 at *6 (N.D.Cal.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMathisen v. Oregon Health and Science University
District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 20, 2023
Plaintiff Jacqueline Mathisen brings this lawsuit against her former employer Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), eight named individual Defendants who are or were members of OHSU’s Board of Directors (OHSU Board … See, e.g., Bayer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownValmarc Corporation v. Nike, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 16, 2024
Striker is Plaintiff’s primary funder, controls the “voting stock of the company,” and its personnel have served on the Valmarc board as chairman of the board, interim CEO, and effectively interim CFO. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Dec 1, 2023
Shillitani v. … See also S.E.C. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Sep 25, 2020
The board “delegated further action . . . to a subcommittee that included a board member, district employee Nancy Edwards, and [Watson].” (Id.) … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Aug 7, 2024
Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 568 U.S. 371, 377 (2013). That discretion, however, is confined to the categories of recoverable costs enumerated at 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Alflex Corp. v. … Kalitta Air L.L.C. v. Cent. Texas Airborne Sys. Inc., 741 F.3d 955, 958 (9th Cir. 2013) (pro hac vice fee not taxable under § 1920); Grove v. Wells Fargo Fin.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCascadia Wildlands v. Scott Timber Co.
190 F. Supp. 3d 1024 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 19, 2016
. *1029 BACKGROUND In 2013, the Oregon State Land Board offered three tracts of the Elliott State Forest for sale. Defs.’ Resp. 4 (doc. 18). … Law Ctr. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished230 F. Supp. 2d 1225 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 24, 2002
OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Petitioner brings this action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . … See Bonin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna