Case law

Rees v. United States

187 F. Supp. 924 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 17, 1960

Woods and Bu-tori were well-acquainted with Rees and with the extent of his practice and the fact that he was one of two doctors in Portland who was a member of the American Board of Orthodontics, a very prestigeous group … Estate of Masquelette v. Commissioner, supra. O’Rear v.

Timber Conservation Co. v. United States

208 F. Supp. 626 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 25, 1962

These stockholders constitute the Board of Directors and officers of the pertinent corporations. … The Oregon case of Paullus v.

City of Portland v. Homeaway.com, Inc.

191 F. Supp. 3d 1157 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 7, 2016

See Watkins v. … Brown v. City of Eugene, 250 Or.App. 132, 136 , 279 P.3d 298 (2012) (internal quotation omitted).

Weishampel v. Circle of Children

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 19, 2019

Bank of Denver, N.A. v. … The board, with the help of an attorney, then conducted a second termination hearing on March 24, 2017, where the board voted to “remove [plaintiff]...from the Board as president as well as executive director (doc. 24)

In re Ryan

21 F. Cas. 105 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 29, 1873

owed not less than 81,700, and that his assets consisted of the furniture and fixtures of the Russ house, worth in cash probably $1,200; a piece of land on the macadam road worth not to exceed $150. and book accounts for board … In Toof v. Martin, 13 Wall. [80 U.

United States v. The Tug Sundial

861 F. Supp. 2d 1208 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 15, 2012

Services performed on board the ship are primarily for his benefit. Id. In essence, a bareboat charter is “tantamount to, though just short of, an outright transfer of ownership.” Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc. v. … I also note that, in finding American liable for the damages resulting from the negligent collision, Barge Line cited Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc. v.

Ahmed v. MID-COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER

673 F. Supp. 2d 1194 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 20, 2009

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (# 65) for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Mid-Columbia Medical Center (MCMC); Duane W. … GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to the extent that Plaintiffs claim is based on Defendants’ submission of reports about Plaintiff to the National Practitioner’s Data Bank and the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners (OBME); b.

I Hyeon Su v. M/V Southern Aster

767 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 10, 1990

See Cuevas v. … Plaintiffs contend that the vessel need only have been in a U.S. harbor at some point in time with the plaintiffs seamen on board for the penalty wage statute to apply to their claims.

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Cascade Kelly Holdings LLC

155 F. Supp. 3d 1100 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 30, 2015

Stryker v. … EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board also has noted: “When a petitioner seeks review of a permit based on issues that are fundamentally technical in nature, the Board assigns a particularly heavy burden to the petitioner.

Lyon v. Oregon State Hospital

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 6, 2023

BISHOP, MHTT- Security, Oregon State Hospital; MICHAEL MURR, RN, Nurse Manager, Oregon State Hospital; BRYNN BROWN … United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.

Icebreaker Ltd. v. Gilmar S.P.A.

911 F. Supp. 2d 1099 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 26, 2012

BROWN, District Judge. … See Nabisco, Inc. v.

Reyes v. Washburn

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 30, 2024

Naso, Jermaine Brown, Kerry J. Shepherd, R. Kyle Busse, and April Stone, Markowitz Herbold PC, 1455 SW Broadway, Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97201. … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

Simmons v. Clatskanie School District 6J

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 2025

Megan Evenson ("Evenson") is the Clatskanie School Board ("Board") Chair. Id. … After his termination, plaintiff emailed Evenson to request a meeting with the Board. Id. ¶ 23. Evenson responded that under ORS § 332.544, "[plaintiff] was not entitled to a post-dismissal board hearing[.]"

Daily v. Halbert

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 26, 2022

See Thomas v. … .”); United States. v.

Norton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 30, 2020

that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney the sum of $9934.10 upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. … Brown ______________________________ U.S.

Kruger v. Pacific Benefits Group Northwest, LLC.

228 F. Supp. 2d 1143 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 2001

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (# 35). … Nicol v. Imagematrix, Inc., 773 F.Supp. 802, 804 (E.D.Va.1991).

Goodnough Mercantile & Stock Co. v. Galloway

156 F. 504 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 3, 1906

The general doctrine as here announced has the apparent sanction of the Supreme Court of the United States, in Ketchum v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306 , 25 L. Ed. 999 , and Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 , 17 Sup. … Yeatman v. Savings Institution, 95 U. S. 764 , 24 L. Ed. 589 . See, also, Stewart v. Platt, 101 U. S. 731 , 25 L. Ed. 816 , and Hauselt v. Harrison, 105 U. S. 401 , 26 L. Ed. 1075 .

Green

District Court, D. Oregon · May 27, 2026

After forty-five days of using the product, Plaintiff noticed “fecal colored brown” discoloration on his teeth. Id. … The brown staining on his teeth appears to be permanent. Id.

United States v. Hurd

427 F. Supp. 2d 984 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 7, 2006

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Suppress (# 13) of Defendant Adonis Latrell Hurd. … Based on United States v.

United States v. Owen

32 F. 534 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 7, 1887

S. v. … People v. Miller, 12 Cal. 291 ; People v. Montejo, 18 Cal. 38 .