Case law

Dillon v. United States

218 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 6, 1963

See Brown v. United States, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 314 F.2d 293 (1963). … . * * * ” The majority opinion in Hill v.

The Thielbek

218 F. 251 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 16, 1914

Ass’n v. Furness, Withy & Co., 215 Fed. 863 , 132 C. C. A. 201 ; the Beaver (D. C.) 197 Fed. 866 . … S. v. Port of Portland (D. C.) 147 Fed. 865 . Port of Portland v. U. S., 176 Fed. 866 , 100 C. C. A. 336 .

Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co. v. O'Leary

238 F. Supp. 634 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 9, 1964

Voris v. Eikel, 346 U.S. 328 , 74 S.Ct. 88 , 98 L.Ed. 5 (1953); Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp. v. Donovan, 279 F.2d 76 (5th Cir.1960); Great American Indemnity Co. v. … Costello v. Fazio, 256 F.2d 903 (9th Cir.1958); Carr v. Southern Pac. Co., 128 F.2d 764 (9th Cir.1952); Tepper v. Chichester, 285 F.2d 309, 312 (9th Cir.1960).

Torres v. Zamanizadeh

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 2022

See Thomas v. … Rowland v.

In re Parker

18 F. Cas. 1112 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 12, 1878

It also appears that after the purchase of the team it was used more or less by the adult son of the bankrupt in teaming about Albany, he receiving his board from his father and allowing him two dollars per day of the proceeds … In Brusie v.

Anderson v. Gladden

303 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 5, 1967

Two others, Wendel Brown and Perry Chocktoot, swore that Anderson could not have killed Miller because he returned to the nearby Hecoeta house with them immediately after the shooting. … As the Supreme Court wrote in Irvin v.

United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

569 F. Supp. 1138 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 3, 1983

See, e.g., United States v. United Foam Corp., 565 F.2d 563, 565-566 (9th Cir.1977); see also FTC v. Singer, 668 F.2d 1107, 1110-1113 (9th Cir.1982). … I therefore find that the appointment of a trustee is an appropriate remedy, see Iowa Beef Processors, supra; Reed v. Cleveland Board of Education, 607 F.2d 737, 740-744 , 748 and note 1 (6th Cir.1979).

Axos Bank v. Rosenblum

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 14, 2020

Co. v. … Brown, 651 F.2d 613, 614 n.1 (9th Cir. 1980) (finding injury stemming from private rights granted by statute “could not have been traced to the action of the attorney general, against whom relief is sought”); Zepeda v.

The Queen of the Pacific

18 F. 700 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 1883

rendered valuable aid and assistance to said steamship in enabling her to get off from said spit,” and alleges that the value of the vessel is of no greater sum than $485,000, and that at the time of said stranding she had on board … In Peters v. Warren Ins. Co. 1 Story, 468 , Mr.

League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Smith

491 F. Supp. 2d 980 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 17, 2007

On September 30, 2004, the Forest Service issued a Decision Memo for the High Roberts salvage timber sale, authorizing the logging of 2.7 million board feet of timber. … Buckhannon Board and Care Home v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 604 , 121 S.Ct. 1835 , 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001).

Chalice Vineyards, LLC v. United States

District Court, D. Oregon · May 20, 2025

Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 869 F.3d 795, 800 (9th Cir. 2017). … Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United States, 68 F.3d 1204, 1206 (9th Cir. 1995) (quoting Cervantes v. City of San Diego, 5 F.3d 1273, 1276 (9th Cir. 1993)); see Smith v.

Thomas Kay Woolen Mill Co. v. Sprague

259 F. 338 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 23, 1919

Washingon has a statute similar to that of Oregon, and in Clayson v. Clayson, 26 Wash. 253 , 66 Pac. 410 , and Rader v. Stubblefield, 43 Wash. 334 , 86 Pac. 560 , 10 Ann. … L. § 756; Ramsey v. Stephenson, 34 Or. 408 , 56 Pac. 520 , 57 Pac. 195 ; Mansfield v. Hill, 56 Or. 408 , 107 Pac. 471 , 108 Pac. 1007 ; Christianson v. King County, 239 U. S. 356 , 36 Sup. Ct. 114, 60 L.

Hanna v. Peters

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 28, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3-4, ECF No. 21; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Seiko Epson Corp. v. Glory South Software Manufacturing, Inc.

830 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 15, 2011

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (#351) for Partial Summary *1074 Judgment of Unenforceability of U.S. … Therasense Inc. v.

Orozco v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 24, 2019

This case is distinguishable from Brown-Hunter for two reasons. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494 (citing Treichler, 775 F.3d at 1099).

City of Springfield v. Washington Public Power Supply System

564 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 15, 1983

United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 209-210 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 884 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970); Clearfield Trust Co. v. … Lynn, 392 F.Supp. 879, 881-882 (D.Conn.1975); Marcus Garvey Square v.

Loiseau v. Dept. of Human Resources of State of Or.

558 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 28, 1983

On December 23,1980, plaintiff filed a complaint with the State of Oregon’s Employment Relations Board challenging the March 7, 1978 PMR. … of Regents v.

Vanderzanden v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · May 15, 2025

Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (emphases in original) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494. Failure to do so is legal error. Id.

Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corp.

144 F. Supp. 3d 1185 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2015

Corp. v. … Memory Integrity simply cites one document that states that Intel’s server boards could support up to two processors.

Wilson v. Highberger

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 2025

Petitioner brought this habeas corpus Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and challenged “prison term decisions” of the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision on grounds that the Board violated his federal … See Burnett v. Lampert, 432 F.3d 996, 999-1001 (9th Cir. 2005).