Case law

Kinkel v. Long

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 15, 2020

See Montgomery v. Louisiana, 136 S. Ct. 718 (2016); Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012); Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010). … In Kinkel v.

McGowan

District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 17, 2026

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152-54 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 382 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). … Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154; Decker v. Berryhill, 856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017).

LNV Corp. v. Fauley

178 F. Supp. 3d 1043 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 18, 2016

(citing Schleef v. … Brown and W. Dougherty, Assignment of Realty Mortgages in Oregon, 17 Or. L.

Richardson v. Northwest Christian University

242 F. Supp. 3d 1132 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 16, 2017

It relied heavily on the absence of any allegation that board members had “ecclesiastical duties or privileges,” the fact that the organizations were not themselves churches, and that the board members’ *1145 titles (“manager … V.

Alijah J. B. v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 20, 2026

Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020). And the Court “will not fault the agency merely for explaining its decision with ‘less than ideal clarity.’” Brown-Hunter v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492, 495; Reddick, 157 F.3d at 720– 21.

Far West Federal Bank, S.B. v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision

738 F. Supp. 1564 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 8, 1990

Caribbean Marine Serv. v. Baldrige, 844 F.2d 668 , 674 (9th Cir.1988); Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Comm’n v. National Football League, 634 F.2d 1197 , 1200 (9th Cir.1980). … In Fernandez v.

Giba v. Cook

232 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 31, 2002

Parole Board Bias Lastly, Giba alleges a liberty interest in proceeding before an impartial parole board. … Hemphill asserts that she notified the parole board in June 1998 that she had received tampered mail and that it had a “chilling effect” on their confidential communications.

Cocina Cultura LLC v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 27, 2021

Cocina Cultura also provides a press release issued by Governor Kate Brown in response to the Great Northern settlement. See ECF 149-2 at 1–2. … Two years ago, in Board of Trustees of Glazing Health and Welfare Trust v. Chambers, 941 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2019) (en banc), the Ninth Circuit clarified its mootness doctrine with respect to legislative actions.

Boquist v. Courtney

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 7, 2020

Governor Brown also imposed a $500 fine for each day a given senator was absent during the legislative session. 1 — OPINION AND ORDER State Police did not arrest Plaintiff, but Governor Brown did levy a $3,500 fine against … Even if the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint to cure these defects, Governor Brown ordered the senators’ arrests and imposed these fines, and Plaintiff has not named Governor Brown in this action.

Trabucco v. Carlile

57 F. Supp. 2d 1074 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 29, 1999

Smith v. Sperling, 354 U.S. 91, 93 , 77 S.Ct. 1112 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1205 (1957); see also Liddy v. Urbanek, 707 F.2d 1222, 1224 (11th Cir.1983); ORS 60.261. … See Roberts v. Corrothers, 812 F.2d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir.1987); Eitel v. Reagan, 898 F.Supp. 734, 737 (D.Or.1995).

Center for Legal Studies, Inc. v. Lindley

64 F. Supp. 2d 970 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 18, 1999

In Brungardt v. Barton, 69 Or. … Amendment); Jackson v.

Burwell v. Portland School District No. 1J

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 30, 2020

and school board. … But see Morse v.

Carroll

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 9, 2026

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). … v.

LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS-BLUE v. Zielinski

187 F. Supp. 2d 1263 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 25, 2002

board feet of unburned trees from over 900 acres. … Van De Kamp v.

Anderson v. Hibu, Inc.

26 F. Supp. 3d 1019 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 12, 2014

See Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1188 (9th Cir.2003) (“Under Ninth Circuit law, circumstantial evidence of pretext must be specific and substantial in order to survive summary judgment.”). … It is the OED (e.g., Employment Appeals Board) that makes this legal determination, not the employer. See, e.g., Beauchaton v. Emp’t Dep’t, 246 Or.App. 494 , 266 P.3d 148 (2011). .

Delcore v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 27, 2025

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.

Pacificorp v. Portland General Electric Co.

770 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 3, 1991

Hector v. Wiens, 533 F.2d 429, 432 (9th Cir.1976). ANALYSIS In Parker v. … Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97, 105 , 100 S.Ct. 937, 943 , 63 L.Ed.2d 233 (1980), the Court explained that its decisions “establish two standards for antitrust immunity under Parker v. Brown.

Building Syndicate Co. v. United States

181 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 15, 1960

Co. v. Hel-vering, 1938, 68 App.D.C. 344 , 98 F.2d 216 ; Akron Dry Goods Co. v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 1143 . … The Court then proceeded to affirm the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Lazarus. Therefore, I consider Lazarus to be the law on this case. The Akron Dry Goods Co. v.

Reynolds v. City of Eugene

937 F. Supp. 2d 1284 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 22, 2013

Trade Comm’n v. Publ’g Clearing House, Inc., 104 F.3d 1168 , 1171 (9th Cir.1997); see also Soremekun v. … [W]e should review the cases together before submitting our recommendations to the Board. Again, official correspondence with the . Board needs to be managed by the Auditor at this point.” Reynolds Deck Ex. 18.

Knarr

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 1, 2026

Jensen v. Brown, 131 F.4th 677, 696 (9th Cir. 2025). Section 1983 is not an unequivocal waiver or abrogation of sovereign immunity. Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 (1989). … Goldstein, 555 U.S. 335, 343 (9th Cir. 2009) (listing acts entitled to prosecutorial immunity); Brown v. Cal.