Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
1.27s
R.A. Gray & Co. v. Oregon Washington Carpenters-Employers Pension Trust Fund
549 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 11, 1982
The Plan is administered by the Board of Trustees (Trustees). Gray is an employer within the meaning of Title IV of ERISA. … Peick v.
Reversed by Shelter Framing Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 705 F.2d 1502 (1983)Cited 8 timesPublished208 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 3, 1962
Higgins v. Smith, 308 U.S. 473, 477 , 60 S.Ct. 355 , 84 L.Ed. 406 ; Gray v. Powell, 314 U.S. 402, 414 , 62 S.Ct. 326 , 86 L.Ed. 301 . … Flynn v. Crume, 7 Cir., 1939, 101 F.2d 661 .
Cited 3 timesPublished241 F. Supp. 523 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 19, 1965
National Labor Relations Board v. … Rheem Manufacturing Co. v. Rheem, 295 F.2d 473 (9th Cir. 1961); Korherr v. Bumb, 262 F.2d 157 (9th Cir. 1958).
Cited 6 timesPublishedRoss Dress for Less, Inc. v. Makarios-Oregon, LLC
191 F. Supp. 3d 1189 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 10, 2016
Second, masonry is more secure than gypsum board. Unlike masonry, gypsum board can be penetrated with an inexpensive, hand-held jab saw. … Brown v. Portland Sch. Dist. No. 1, 291 Or. 77, 84 , 628 P.2d 1183 (1981) (quoting Waterway. Terminals v. P. S. Lord, 242 Or. 1, 26-27 , 406 P.2d 566 (1965); see also Bank of E. Or. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Communications Workers
199 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 31, 1961
Montgomery v. Board of Education, 102 Ohio St. 189 , 193, 131 N.E. 497 , 15 A.L.R. 715 ; Goodman v. Sullivan, 94 Ohio App. 390 , 114 N.E.2d 856, 858 . … B. v.
Reversed on other grounds by Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Association, 310 F.2d 244 (1962)Cited 5 timesPublished296 F. Supp. 3d 1251 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 3, 2017
For example, in United States v. Brown , the Third Circuit concluded that Honeycutt applied with equal force to another forfeiture statute, 21 U.S.C. § 982 (a)(2). 694 Fed. … Brown , 694 Fed. Appx. at 57 -58 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedPranger v. Oregon State University
District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 2023
Elkhorn Baptist Church v. Brown, 366 Or. 506, 524-25, 466 P.3d 30, 43 (2020) (internal quotation marks omitted). … See Beck v. J.M.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFred Meyer, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 206
463 F. Supp. 2d 1186 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 9, 2006
Riverboat Casino, Inc. v. Local Joint Executive Board, 578 F.2d 250 , 251 (9th Cir.1978) (quotation omitted). … In Hughes Aircraft Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPortland General Electric Co. v. U.S. Bank Trust National Ass'n
38 F. Supp. 2d 1195 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 26, 1999
United Mineworkers of Am. v. Sunnyside Coal Co., 841 F.Supp. 382, 385 (D.Utah 1994). … Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlock, Inc., 118 F.3d 985, 992 (3rd Cir.1997).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Aug 29, 2025
STATE OF OREGON, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, as former Attorney General for the State of Oregon, KATE BROWN … Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152-54 (1985). A district judge is not, however, precluded from sua sponte review of other portions of the report, under a de novo standard or otherwise. Id. at 154.
Cited 0 timesUnknown306 F. Supp. 2d 982 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 11, 2003
See Icelandic Coast Guard v. … Falgout Boats, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLowry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
231 F. Supp. 2d 981 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 19, 2001
See also State of California v. … Puckett v. Sellars, 235 N.C. 264 , 69 S.E.2d 497 (1952). 3 . Belcher v. State Harness Racing Com’n, 728 A.2d 425 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). 4 . Schwanda v. Bonney, 418 A.2d 163 (Me.1980).
Cited 2 timesPublishedNeal v. State of Oregon Sheriff's Office
District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 3, 2021
Finally, plaintiff fails to state a claim against defendant Governor Brown upon which relief may be granted under § 1983. … See Wilkinson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown71 F. Supp. 33 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 1947
Fleming v. Huebsch Laundry Corporation, 7 Cir., 159 F.2d 581 . 4 Judgment is for the defendants. … at your mill located at Grants Pass, Oregon. * The Regional Administrator is authorized to grant such an application where he can make findings that the authorization (1) Will result in a greater production of surfaced boards
Cited 1 timesPublishedLakeside v. Freightliner Corporation
612 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 3, 1984
Nees v. Hocks, 272 Or. 210, 216 , 536 P.2d 512 (1975). Under some circumstances, the provisions of a policy handbook may be a part of a contract of employment. In Yartzoff v. … Although the court based its decision on the Nees v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHeard Farms, Inc. v. Franzenburg LLC
District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 8, 2025
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 (1986). … person with respect to licensure with the board.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownNguyen v. Columbia River People's Utility District
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 2022
that the Board do so. … See Lamson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown578 F. Supp. 738 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 17, 1983
Airlines, Inc. v. Commissioner, 528 F.2d 735 , 738 (9th Cir.1976). B. … Johnson states: Beginning with its 1974 fiscal year, ESCO had adequate information from which the amount of its liability for Workmen’s Compensation claims and Board awards could be determined with reasonable accuracy.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSociété des Voiliers Français v. Oregon R. & Nav.
178 F. 324 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 21, 1910
Schuyler v. The Isaac H. Tillyer (C. … Orhanovich v. Steam Tug America (C. C.) 4 Fed. 337 ; The Silica v. The Lord Worden (C. C.) 30 Fed. 845 ; Thompson v. Winslow (D. C.) 130 Fed. 1001 .
Cited 6 timesPublished20 F. Cas. 271 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 1868
Caldwell v. U. S., 8 How. [49 U. S.] 379. … S. v. Wilder [Case No. 16,694], Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna