Case law

Allbee v. State Board of Parole

99 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1989

He seeks review, contending that, by overriding one minimum sentence, the Board necessarily overrode all three and was required to set a new release date. The state concedes error, citing Roof v. … The Board had authority to override only one of the minimum sentences. 1 See Williams v. Board of Parole, 98 Or App 716 , 780 P2d 793 (1989). Petitioner’s remaining contentions do not warrant discussion. Affirmed.

Carlock v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

117 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992

Noren v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 117 Or App 337 , 843 P2d 1021 (1992).

Gilbert v. State Board of Parole

98 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 9, 1989

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole setting his release date. … Matteson v. Board of Parole, 63 Or App 418 , 664 P2d 434 (1983). The record does not show a constitutional infirmity in any of the four convictions. The Board followed its rule here. Affirmed.

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

126 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1994

Under ORS 144.228(1), the Board set a parole consideration hearing date at the end of the 15-year minimum term. See Allred v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 278 , 862 P2d 546 (1993), rev den 318 Or 325 (1994). … Specifically, the Board relies on ORS 144.110 which governs the Board’s authority when a prisoner has been given a minimum sentence.

Peter v. State Board of Parole

34 Or. App. 1119 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1978

Erickson v. Board of Parole, 34 Or App 323 , 578 P2d 499 (1978).

Quinn v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

229 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 2009

That rule provides that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may, under specified circumstances, deny an offender parole rather than set a parole release date. … Petitioner argues that the rule violates state and federal constitutional provisions because it allows the board to deny parole to a person convicted of murder, but—due to the operation of other statutes—not to a person convicted

Parks v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF TILLAMOOK CTY.

11 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1972

Board of Appeals of Saugus, 348 Mass 794, 205 NE2d 227 (1965); Corsino v. Grover, 148 Conn 299, 170 A2d 267 , 95 ALR2d 751 (1961); Vollet v. Schoepflin, 28 App Div 2d 706, 280 NYS2d 950 (1967). … Brady v. Board of Appeals of Westport, 348 Mass 515, 204 NE2d 513 (1965); Bowes v. Inspector of Buildings of Brockton, 347 Mass 295, 197 NE2d 676 (1964); Garrou v.

Davidson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

139 Or. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1996

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) that imposed a 12-month term of supervised parole, followed by unsupervised parole for the balance of his sentence. … As authority for its imposition of parole for the balance of the sentence, the Board cited administrative rules adopted pursuant to ORS 144.085, which, under the statute in effect, 1 provided that the Board’s rules must require

Fowler v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

65 Or. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 9, 1983

Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to his understanding of the requirements of Anders v. … See, e.g., State v. Horine, supra; State v. Kennedy, 64 Or App 556 , 669 P2d 807 (1983). Motion to withdraw as counsel denied.

Asher v. State Board of Parole

100 Or. App. 592 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1990

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order that revoked his parole. He contends that, at the time of the Board’s action, he was no longer on parole, because his “good time” release date had passed. … Ventris v. Maass, 99 Or App 85 , 781 P2d 1224 (1989), rev den 309 Or 231 (1990). Petitioner also contends that the Board improperly denied his request for appointed counsel for the revocation hearing.

Compensation of the Beneficiaries of Brown v. State Accident Insurance Fund

43 Or. App. 447 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1979

Brown (Brown), appeals from .n order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) ffirming the referee’s order denying compensation on he basis that Brown’s death did not arise "out of and i the course of [his] employment,” … In Gumbrecht v.

Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of Commissioners

37 Or. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1978

Compare Holmes v. Graham, 159 Or 466 , 80 P2d 870 (1938) with Portland Baseball Club v. Portland, 142 Or 13 , 18 P2d 811 (1933). … Joyce *578 v. City of Portland, 24 Or App 689 , 546 P2d 1100 (1976). The writ was properly quashed. Affirmed.

Hamilton v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

97 Or. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1989

PER CURIAM This is a petition for review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) denying petitioner’s request to be discharged or conditionally released and committing him to the Oregon State Hospital. … Baldwin v. PSRB, 97 Or App 367 , 776 P2d 577 (1989). Petitioner was committed to PSRB’s jurisdiction in 1982. Therefore, even if pedophilia is a personality disorder, petitioner is not entitled to release on that basis.

Addicks v. Oregon Board of Parole

92 Or. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 1988

See Addicks v. Board of Parole, 63 Or App 409, 411 , 663 P2d 1310 (1983). On February 27, 1986, the Board met to consider petitioner’s parole, but the hearing was continued for lack of a quorum. … The term “full membership of the Board” means “all voting members of the Board holding office and not disqualified from voting.” Larson v. State Board of Parole, 91 Or App 642 , 756 P2d 674 (1988).

Welsh v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

82 Or. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

“[Board chair]: Do you have any questions? “[Board member]: Yes. … Home Plate, Inc. v. OLCC, 20 Or App 188, 190 , 530 P2d 862 (1975). They are.

Britton v. Board of Podiatry Examiners

63 Or. App. 748 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1983

The original case was a judicial review of an order of the Board pf Podiatry Examiners (Board) revoking petitioner’s license to practice podiatry and refusing to renew it for subsequent years. … See Cook v. Employment Division, 293 Or 1 , 643 P2d 1271 (1982), on remand Cook v. Employment Division, 63 Or App 593 , 666 P2d 264 (1983); Brown v.

Phillips v. Board of Hospital Trustees

41 Or. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 1979

Good Samaritan Hosp. v. U. S. Nat., 246 Or 478 , 425 P2d 541 (1967); U. S. Nat. Bank v. First Nat. Bank, 172 Or 683 , 142 P2d 785 , 143 P2d 909 (1943); Restatement (Second) of Trusts, §§ 381, 399 (1959).

Allison v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

47 Or. App. 1029 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1980

Petitioner raises certain constitutional issues in his appeal which were not raised before the Board. We decline to consider them. See State v. Zusman, 1 Or App 268 , 460 P2d 872 (1969), rev den (1970). Affirmed.

Oregon Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner

191 Or. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 2004

See Meader v. … In Amfac Foods v.

Grimes v. Public Employe Relations Board

16 Or. App. 677 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 1974

For similar holdings involving similar statutes, see, Wilder- *679 man v. Nelson, 467 F2d 1173 (8th Cir 1972); Sayah v. United States, 355 F Supp 1008 (CD Cal 1973); and Heaphy v. … Bd. of Higher Ed., 97 Ady Sh 669, 14 Or App 130 , 511 P2d 854 , Sup Ct review denied (1973), in which, relying on Board of Regents v.