Case law

Mageske v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

173 Or. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2001

The Board received no new evidence beyond the evidence summarized in the hearings officer’s report. The Board deferred its re-release decision pending a disposition hearing. See OAR 255-075-0072(2)(c); Woolstrum v. … As the Supreme Court said in Morrissey v.

Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

63 Or. App. 561 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

The legislative history, which we discussed in Brown v. … OLCC, 40 Or App 135 , 594 P2d 1248 (1979) (attorney fee not awarded when the cost of the litigation was or should have been anticipated by petitioner as a normal cost of doing business); Brown v.

Rund v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

152 Or. App. 231 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 1998

The Board’s authority to require special conditions is restricted to those conditions that are necessary for “the protection of public safety and the reformation of the offender.” Martin v. … See, e.g., Thompson v. Prinslow, 138 Or App 183, 184 , 906 P2d 310 (1995).

McGowan v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

146 Or. App. 774 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1997

PER CURIAM Petitioner sought review of a final order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) finding him under PSRB’s continued jurisdiction, arguing that there was not substantial evidence to support PSRB’s finding … McGowan v. PSRB, 139 Or App 600 , 911 P2d 1289 (1996). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded our decision in the light of Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491 , 909 P2d 1211 (1996). McGowan v. PSRB, 324 Or 17 , 920 P2d 153 (1996).

Bennett v. Board of Medical Examiners

31 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1977

Petitioner appeals from a decision of the Board of Medical Examiners (Board) revoking his license to practice medicine. … This contention was decided adversely to him in Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, 233 Or 441 , 378 P2d 945 (1963). We are bound by that decision.

Whitaker v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

25 Or. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 1976

The Board did not err in admitting the evaluation documents into evidence. See State v. Cappleman, 10 Or App 176 , 499 P2d 1372 (1972). Secondly, petitioner contends that the Board improperly admitted testimony from Dr. … See Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Von Weidlein/N. W. Bottling v. OLCC, 16 Or App 81 , 514 P2d 560 , 515 P2d 936 , 517 P2d 295, 300 (1973), Sup Ct review denied (1974).

Becklin v. Board of Examiners for Engineering & Land Surveying

195 Or. App. 186 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 2004

See, e.g., Thomas Creek Lumber v. Board of Forestry, 188 Or App 10, 30 , 69 P3d 1238 (2003); OR-OSHA v. … See Sobel v.

Kendrick v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

146 Or. App. 756 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1997

We have rejected petitioner’s arguments that the Board lacked the authority to take that action. Kessler v. Board of Parole, 145 Or App 584 , 931 P2d 801 (1997); Bollinger v. … Board of Parole, 142 Or App 81 , 920 P2d 1111 , rev allowed 324 Or 394 (1996). Relying on Woolstrum v.

Platt v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

117 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992

Noren v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 117 Or App 337 , 843 P2d 1021 (1992).

Loshbaugh v. Oregon Board of Parole

143 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1996

Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 924 P2d 314 (1996).

School District No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

14 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

In Berry Transport, Inc. v. … The Supreme Court in Wampler v.

Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

152 Or. App. 462 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1998

See Scott v. Board of Parole, 117 Or App 170, 171 , 843 P2d 959 (1992), rev den 315 Or 643 (1993). … See Troiano v. Board of Parole, 144 Or App 325, 326 , 925 P2d 167 (1996), rev den 324 Or 560 (1997). Affirmed.

Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers

144 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 20, 1996

Assuming that facts alleged in plaintiffs complaint are true, Glubka v. Long, 115 Or App 236, 238 , 837 P2d 553 (1992), we review to determine whether those facts state a claim. Hansen v. … Fleming v. Kids and Kin Head Start, 71 Or App 718, 721 , 693 P2d 1363 (1985); see also Chaney v.

Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

276 Or. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2016

Morrow v. Red Shield Ins. Co., 212 Or App 653, 661 , 159 P3d 384 (2007). … See, e.g., Oregon Southwest, LLC v.

SAIF Corp. v. May

193 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 2004

Both parties cite SAIF v. Brown, 177 Or App 113 , 33 P3d 336 (2001). … SAIF argues here, as it did in SAIF v.

Meadows v. Schiedler

143 Or. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1996

See Penrod / Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978) (tracing historical development of habeas corpus in Oregon). Use of the writ has evolved beyond cases challenging the judgment of *217 conviction, 3 Mueller v. … See Bedell v.

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of County Commissioners

32 Or. App. 413 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1978

The following excerpts from the Board’s findings provide a focus for the issues raised by petitioners. … We held in Rutherford v.

Independent Contractors v. Construction Contractors Board

135 Or. App. 556 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1995

ORS 701.035 provides, in part: “(1) An applicant must qualify as an independent contractor, under ORS 670.600, to register with the board. “(2) The board shall establish two classes of independent contractor registration: … Co-Oper. v.

Merrick v. Board of Higher Education

111 Or. App. 414 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1992

In Merrick v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). In the light of respondents’ agreement with petitioner that the rules are valid, an implication that a controversy exists is no longer appropriate.

Sinsel v. Oregon Board of Forestry

134 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1995

It appears that the Board analyzed the issue of compensability under our decision in Mathel v. Josephine County, 122 Or App 424 , 858 P2d 450 (1993). … After the Board’s decision, the Supreme Court reversed our decision in Mathel. 319 Or 235 , 875 P2d 455 (1994).