Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • Steward v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    194 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 2004

    Beiswenger v. PSRB, 192 Or App 38 , 84 P3d 180 (2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washa v. Oregon Department of Corrections

    159 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1999

    See Fuhrer v. … Cunningham v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Sager v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    121 Or. App. 607 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 1993

    Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 *613 P2d 934 (1978). The state contends that, even if petitioner’s allegations are “legally correct and well-founded in fact,” he is not entitled to habeas relief. … We held that the tried court had correctly dismissed the writ: “Plaintiff does not allege facts that show a ‘further imprisonment or restraint’ under the first category in Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, [supra]. See Fox v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Citizens' Utility Board v. Oregon Public Utility Commission

    128 Or. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1994

    See Beckman Industries, Inc. v. International Ins. Co., 966 F2d 470 (9th Cir 1992); Farmers Ins. v. Hansen, 46 Or App 377 , 611 P2d 696 (1980). … See Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone v. Katz, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

    37 Or. App. 219 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 21, 1978

    Mintz, 233 Or 441 , 378 P2d 945 (1963); Ward v. Ore. State Bd. of Nursing, 266 Or 128 , 510 P2d 554 (1973); Hurley v. Board of Dental Examiners, 29 Or App 223 , 562 P2d 1229 (1977). … In Ward v. Ore.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    267 Or. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 2014

    ); Drew v. … In Green v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gardener v. Marion County Board of County Commissioners

    226 Or. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 2009

    PER CURIAM This case is materially indistinguishable, with respect to mootness, from Cyrus v. Board of County Commissioners, 226 Or App 1 , 202 P3d 214 (2009).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Perdue v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    165 Or. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 1, 2000

    The Board relies on Barnes v. Thompson, 159 Or App 383, 387 , 977 P2d 431 (1999), where we held that an inmate’s release rendered his petition for habeas corpus relief moot. … See Bagby v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 118 Or App 421, 428 , 847 P2d 898 (1993).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald People's Utility District

    191 Or. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 2004

    In LaGrande /Astoria v. … Emerald PUD v. PP&L, 302 Or 256, 265-66 , 729 P2d 552 (1986).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dizick v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    260 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2013

    Board of Parole, 304 Or 385, 392-93 , 745 P2d 1210 (1987) (board lacked general or equitable jurisdiction to enforce terms of a plea agreement not embodied in judgment); Gaynor v. … Board of Parole, 165 Or App 609, 615 , 996 P2d 1020 (2000), overruled on other grounds by State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    125 Or. App. 87 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1993

    After our decisions in Roof v. Board of Parole, 85 Or App 188 , 736 P2d 193 (1987), and Hill v. … See Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993); Williams v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Pacific Skyline, Inc.

    266 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 2014

    Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp., 257 Or App 188, 192 , 306 P3d 726 (2013); Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988). … Brown, 93 Or App at 591 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    221 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2008

    Cole v. Board of Parole, 220 Or App 362 , 186 P3d 321 (2008).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    241 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2011

    v. … an alternate ground for the board’s decision); Maimon v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Union Oil Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

    81 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 27, 1986

    In Clackamas Co. v. … See Clackamas Co. v. Holmes, supra, 265 Or at 197 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Peck v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    221 Or. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2008

    Cole v. Board of Parole, 220 Or App 362 , 186 P3d 321 (2008).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Nursing v. Yost

    108 Or. App. 243 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

    The Board applied the correct legal standard. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Gaul, 108 Or App 237 , 815 P2d 710 (1991). … It further asserts that the diagnoses of Brown and Glass are unpersuasive. The Board was entitled to give weight to all of the diagnoses. Brown concluded that claimant’s depression following the injury was caused by it.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sopher v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    233 Or. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 6, 2010

    Sopher v. Board of Parole, 197 Or App 118, 119 , 103 P3d 683 (2005), rev den (June 13, 2006). … Telephone Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brundridge v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    192 Or. App. 648 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 2004

    (emphasis added)); State v. Stephens, 184 Or App 556, 559-60 , 56 P3d 950 (2002), rev den, 335 Or *654 195 (2003) (referring to knife as weapon for purposes of officer’s concern for safety); State v. … of the Board’s ultimate sanction following revocation,” Mageske v. *657 Board of Parole, 173 Or App 209, 215 , 21 P3d 150 (2001), we remand for further consideration. 6 Order revoking parole vacated; remanded for further

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Nacoste v. Halton Co.

    275 Or. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 2015

    We review the board’s legal determinations for legal error. Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal, 175 Or App 609, 613 , 29 P3d 1165 (2001). … We conclude that the board did not err when it adopted the ALJ’s determination that, as a matter of law, a consequential condition cannot be the basis for an aggravation claim. *607 That is so even in light of Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.