Case law

Eli v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

187 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2003

“[ORS 144.335(1)] means: An inmate must use any process of administrative review provided by Board rule * * * before seeking judicial review.” Jenkins v. … Garcia v. Board of Parole, 109 Or App 321 , 818 P2d 1296 (1991).

Carroll v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 20, 1993

In Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 625-26 , 740 P2d 760 (1987), which construed the pre-1988 rules, the court said: “[T]he administrative procedure for minimum sentence review works like this: The Board takes a vote to overrride

Perrin v. Oregon State Board of Higher Edhcation

15 Or. App. 268 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 1973

See *271 also, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 US 593 , 92 S Ct 2694 , 33 L Ed 2d 570 (1972).” … That hope is not á property right and the frustration of such a hope- does not trigger the right to a hearing under Board of Regents v.

Board of Cty. Comm. of Columbia Cty. v. Rosenblum

324 Or. App. 221 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2023

The Board, on the other hand, relying on Couey v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449, 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (internal citation omitted).

Murphy v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1996

He contends that the Board violated applicable law by failing to hold a hearing before issuing the order. He asks us to reverse the order and to remand with specific instructions that the Board release petitioner. … See, e.g., Floyd v. Motor Vehicles Div., 27 Or App 41, 44-45 , 554 P2d 1024 , rev den 276 Or 873 (1976). Affirmed.

Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

244 Or. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 20, 2011

See Roy v. … See Strawn v.

Hibbard v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

144 Or. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1996

In Eggsman v. Board of Parole, 60 Or App 381, 385-86 , 653 P2d 1277 (1982), we held that, under the general statutory grant of authority to parole, the Board is authorized to advance the prison release date. … In Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 (1996), which involves virtually identical arguments, we rejected that premise.

DeWaal v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

236 Or. App. 623 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 11, 2010

Noble v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

145 Or. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 1996

Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327 , 912 P2d 403 , rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), Gress v. … Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 , on recons 144 Or App 375 , 927 P2d 138 (1996), and Coleman v. Board of Parole, 144 Or App 487 , 927 P2d 622 (1996). Affirmed.

Reed v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

240 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011

State v. Walker, 234 Or App 596, 606 , 229 P3d 606 , rev allowed, 349 Or 56 (2010). The preservation requirements established in ORAP 5.45(1) apply to review of a board final order. Larsen v. … Board of Parole, 206 Or App 353, 366 , 138 P3d 16 (2006). Under State v.

Joyce v. Public Employees Retirement Board

209 Or. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2006

City of Klamath Falls v. Environ. Quality Comm., 318 Or 532, 545 , 870 P2d *293 825 (1994); PEBB v. OHSU, 205 Or App 64, 82 , 132 P3d 1061 (2006). … Severy v. Board of Parole, 318 Or 172 , 176 n 7, 864 P2d 368 (1993).

Menges v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF JACKSON

45 Or. App. 797 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Board of Commissioners

40 Or. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1979

The Clackamas County Board of Commissioners (Board) granted the variance. Petitioner challenged the Board’s action by writ of review. … Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761 , 566 P2d 904 , rev den (1977).

Thierman v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

134 Or. App. 304 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 1995

Byrnes v. Board of Parole, 134 Or App 296, 300 , 894 P2d 1252 (1995). Thus, we must determine whether petitioner is disadvantaged by the application of ORS 144.085(l)(b). … See Carroll v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 180, 182 , 859 P2d 1203 (1993) (finding no ex post facto violation when the Board considered the seriousness of a crime in deciding not to overturn a minimum prison sentence).

Larsen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

231 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 2009

Brown v. Hackney, 228 Or App 441, 447 , 208 P3d 988 (2009). That is not always the case, however. See Abbott v. … See Larsen v. Board of Parole, 206 Or App 353, 365 , 138 P3d 16 (2006). Petitioner sought judicial review, and we remanded for a new hearing. Id. 3 In Morgan v.

Daniel v. Board of County Commissioners

212 Or. App. 76 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 11, 2007

Baker v. … Carlson v. Myers, 327 Or 213, 226 , 959 P2d 31 (1998); PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-11 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993). The legislature has given defendants the authority to “fix the number” of deputies.

Walton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

238 Or. App. 664 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 2010

Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536, 544 , 175 P3d 408 (2007). Directly on point in that regard is our decision in Larsen v. … To similar effect is our more recent decision in Fleming v. Board of Parole, 225 Or App 578 , 202 P3d 209 , rev allowed, 346 Or 361 (2009).

Martinez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

230 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 5, 2009

Fleming v. Board of Parole, 225 Or App 578 , 202 P3d 209 , rev allowed, 346 Or 361 (2009).

Strome v. Lane County Board of Commissioners

230 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 5, 2009

Hayes Oyster Co. v. … Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 502 , 985 P2d 854 (1999).

Alexander v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

205 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2006

The board insists that Hamel is distinguishable. According to the board, the more pertinent decision is Meriweather v. … Dept. v.