Case law

Dickinson v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS, CLACKAMAS CTY.

21 Or. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1975

Selection of which believable evidence was, in fact, to be accepted was for the Board, not for us. See, Von Weidlein/N.W. Bottling v. … Affirmed. ① Fasano v. Washington Co.

Laing v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

256 Or. App. 40 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2013

the Parole Board.” … Cf.Arken v. City of Portland, 351 Or 113, 138-39 , 263 P3d 975 (2011) (explaining that “promissory estoppel against a governmental entity * * * can be applied only in limited circumstances”).

Jones v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

283 Or. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2017

Gordon v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 618, 622 , 175 P3d 461 (2007). … The board also cites Jenkins v.

Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

143 Or. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1996

Petitioner seeks review of orders of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the Board) that declared him to be a predatory sex offender. … In Williford v.

Flowers v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

In Greenholtz v. … See also Jancsek v.

Steinbach v. Oregon State Board of Pharmacy

100 Or. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1990

PER CURIAM In this proceeding under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of rules adopted by the State Board of Pharmacy (Board). … See Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 79 Or App 21 , 717 P2d 658 (1986). Motion to dismiss rule challenge as moot granted.

Wille v. Board of Parole & Post-Prision Supervision

287 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2017

Dixon v. … See Atkinson v.

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

176 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2001

App. 252 Reynaldo RIOS, Petitioner, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Respondent. 84-672; A104844 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Record and Briefs July 23, 2001. Decided August 22, 2001. Harris S. … Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB), upon remand to the Board from the Supreme Court, Rios v.

Afzal v. Public Employees Retirement Board

257 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 2013

In Afzal v. … PERB, 239 Or App 284, 293 , 246 P3d 5 (2010) (Afzal I), we reversed and remanded a final order in which the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) had denied claimant’s request for a disability retirement allowance on the

Adams v. Board of Clinical Social Workers

201 Or. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 8, 2005

ORS 183.482(8)(a); see Pauly v. Employment Division, 74 Or App 479, 483, 703 P2d 991 (1985). … See ORS 183.450 ("[E]rroneous rulings on evidence shall not preclude agency action on the record unless shown to have substantially prejudiced the rights of a party[.]”); Hoffman Construction Co. v.

Gaynor v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

165 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2000

We review the Board’s order for substantial evidence, errors of law, and abuse of discretion. ORS 144.335(5); ORS 183.482(8); Kessler v. … SAIF v. Shipley, 326 Or 557,561 , 955 P2d 244 (1998). That principle extends to administrative bodies, such as the Board, that perform judicial functions.

Guzman v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON

200 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2005

the board’s failure to afford a timely hearing. … For instance, petitioner could have compelled the board to act by writ of mandamus. ORS 34.110; see also Valleur v.

Shelby v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 1996

Accord Miller v. … Collins v.

Vrieling v. Oregon State Board of Parole

21 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1975

Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 US 471 , 92 S Ct 2593 , 33 L Ed 2d 484 (1972). Two separate hearings, however, are not required. A proper consolidated hearing may satisfy due process requirements. Gagnon v. … See, Waltz v. Bd. of Parole, 18 Or App 652 , 526 P2d 586 (1974).

Atkinson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

280 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 31, 2016

See Brumnett v. … In the board’s view, the issue is controlled by our decisions in Rivas v. Persson, 256 Or App 829 , 304 P3d 765 (2013), and Miller v. Board of Parole, 261 Or App 795 , 323 P3d 980 (2014).

Auckland v. BOARD OF CTY. COM'RS OF MULTNOMAH

21 Or. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 2, 1975

See, Tierney v. Duris, Pay Less Properties, 21 Or App 613 , 536 P2d 435 (1975). … Dickinson v. Bd. of County Comm., 21 Or App 98 , 533 P2d 1395 (1975).

Baillie v. State Board of Higher Education

79 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 1986

State v. Clark, 291 Or 231, 243 , 630 P2d 810 (1981); City of Klamath Falls v. Winters, 289 Or 757 , 769 n 10, 619 P2d 217 (1980). … See Vlandis v. Kline, 412 US 441, 453 , 93 S Ct 2230 , 37 L Ed 2d 63 (1971); Melvin v. Board of Higher Education, 17 Or App 216, 218 , 521 P2d 35 (1974).

Damman v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF YAMHILL COUNTY

241 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011

Damman, an individual; and Friends of Yamhill County, Inc., an Oregon non-profit corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF YAMHILL COUNTY, an Oregon municipal corporation; Charles J. … This case concerns issues similar to those decided in Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 237 Or.App. 149 , 238 P.3d 1016 (2010), rev. allowed, 349 Or. 602 , 249 P.3d 123 (2011).

Walton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

267 Or. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2014

Board of Parole, 349 Or 432 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010), and Severy/Wilson v. … Compare Hamel v.

Anderson v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

65 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1983

The period of commitment ordered by the board shall not exceed the maximum sentence the person could have received had the person been found responsible.” … Petitioner’s remedy was to appeal the trial court’s order, rather than PSRB’s order. 3 See, e.g., State v. Carrol, 54 Or App 445 , 635 P2d 17 , rev den 292 Or 334 (1981).