Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

0.75s

  • State v. Brown

    331 Or. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 2024

    Relying on our decision in State v. … See Peeples v. 626 State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lewis-Taylor v. Board of Parole

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023

    Like the petitioners in two other cases decided today, Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, ___ P3d ___ (2023), and Watson v. … The petitioner in Watson did not raise the issue to the board, but, relying on Tuckenberry v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dasher v. Brown

    328 Or. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2023

    Affirmed. 130 Dasher v. Brown LAGESEN, C. J. … See Aaron v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ward v. OREGON STATE BOARD OF NURSING

    11 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 18, 1973

    In Board of Medical Examiners v. … Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, supra.

    Reversed on other grounds by Ward v. Oregon State Board of Nursing, 266 Or. 128 (1973)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gambee v. Board of Medical Examiners

    143 Or. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 11, 1996

    See Port of Portland v. … Foundries v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Miller

    325 Or. App. 403 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2023

    Affirmed. 404 Brown v. Miller LAGESEN, C. J. … He argues that counsel “should have anticipated” the holding of Ramos, 590 US at ___, 140 S Ct at 1396, that the Sixth Amendment 406 Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bahrenfus v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    120 Or. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993

    Accident Prevention Div. v. Asana, 110 Or App 103, 107 , 821 P2d 432 (1991). … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 636 , 740 P2d 760 (1987) (Gillette, J., dissenting).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gilmore v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

    81 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986

    Samuel v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 77 Or App 53, 59 , 712 P2d 132 (1985), rev den 300 Or 704 (1986). … She argues that, before the Board could discipline her, it was required to promulgate rules under the holdings of Trebesch v. Employment Division, 300 Or 264 , 710 P2d 136 (1985), and Megdal v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hart v. Brown

    325 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2023

    Argued and submitted February 9, affirmed April 5, 2023 Curtis HART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Jaquelynn BROWN, aka Jackie Brown, Defendant-Respondent. Jefferson County Circuit Court 20CV07899; A177371 Daina A. Vitolins, Judge.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Singleton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    262 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Kleikamp v. Board of County Commissioners

    240 Or. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

    KLEIKAMP and Friends of Yamhill County, Inc., an Oregon non-profit corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF YAMHILL COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent, and Glenn H. Gregg, Donald E. … See Friends of Yamhill County, 237 Or.App. 149 , 238 P.3d 1016 ; Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or. App. 46 , 245 P.3d 688 (2010); Damman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akins v. SAIF Corp.

    286 Or. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 7, 2017

    to evaluate claimant’s condition in a manner that was contrary to our decision in Brown v. … Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 244 , 391 P3d 773 (2017) (Brown II).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Board on Police Standards & Training

    100 Or. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 1990

    Although the meaning of the rule is a question of law for the court, see Mershon v. … See ORS 183.482(8); Mershon v. Oregonian Publishing, supra, 96 Or App at 226 ; see also ORS 181.640(1)(a), (d).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    283 Or. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2017

    See State v. … State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Emerson v. Deschutes County Board of Commissioners

    46 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1980

    On September 1, 1978, the Deschutes County board of commissioners approved the final plat. … State ex rel Redden v. Van Hoomissen, 281 Or 647 , 576 P2d 355 (1978); Nelson v. Baker, supra. Cf. Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or 619 , 552 P2d 533 (1976)(declaratory judgment); Allied Vet. Council v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Riemer v. Oregon Public Employees Retirement Board

    258 Or. App. 665 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 25, 2013

    See Fort Vannoy Irrigation v. Water Resources Comm., 214 Or App 88 , 90 n 1, 162 P3d 1066 (2007), affd, 345 Or 56 , 188 P3d 277 (2008). … See State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009) (setting out the method for interpreting Oregon statutes).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fujimoto v. Land Use Board of Appeals

    52 Or. App. 875 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1981

    The commission shall issue its determination on the recommendation of the Board and return the determination to the Board for inclusion in the Board’s order under § 5 of this 1979 Act * * § 6(3). … Racing Com., 215 Or 76, 79 , 332 P2d 634 (1958) (quoting State ex rel v. Grand Jury, 37 Or 542 , 62 P 208 (1900)).”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fisher/Gordon v. Board of Parole

    239 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2010

    FISHER, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. Dennis Leroy Gordon, Petitioner, v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Respondent. A142990 (Control), A143153. … GORDON v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peplinski v. Construction Contractors Board

    183 Or. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2002

    The board is required to provide a “sufficient explanation to allow a reviewing court to examine the agency’s action.” Schoch v. Leupold & Stevens, 325 Or 112, 118 , 934 P2d 410 (1997). … Lindgren v. Berg, 307 Or 659, 665 , 772 P2d 1336 (1989). It is subject to the rules of contract interpretation. Ristau v. Wescold, Inc., 318 Or 383, 387 , 868 P2d 1331 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    268 Or. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 22, 2015

    Colby v. … In Swarthout v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.