Case law

State v. Brown

306 Or. App. 652 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 2020

TYLER MICHAEL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. Lincoln County Circuit Court 18CR59273; A169722 473 P3d 1164 Sheryl Bachart, Judge. … The trial court denied the motion, relying on State v.

State v. Brown

305 Or. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 29, 2020

Aoyagi, J., dissenting. 646 State v. Brown KISTLER, S. J. … See State v.

Brown v. Baldwin

131 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1994

Defendant responds that, although certain previous decisions, including Fine v. Zenon, 114 Or App 183 , 834 P2d 509 (1992), might support petitioner’s position, those decisions were implicitly overruled by Bartz v. … Bartz v. State of Oregon, supra, 314 Or at 358 , adopts the same construction.

Johnson v. Brown

193 Or. App. 375 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 2004

was missing from a Super Bowl pot at work and Brown believed that plaintiff was connected to its disappearance. 3 See, e.g., Binder v. … Those definitions are equally apt here. 8 Bickford v. Tektronix, Inc., 116 Or App 547 , 842 P2d 432 (1992); Worley v. OPS, 69 Or App 241 , 686 P2d 404 , rev den, 298 Or 334 (1984); Benassi v.

State v. Brown

284 Or. App. 671 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2017

State v. Zavala, 276 Or App 612, 618-19 , 368 P3d 831 (2016). 3 We agree with the state and accept the state’s concessions on those points. … Mazziotti, 276 Or App 773 , 369 P3d 1200 , rev allowed, 359 Or 847 (2016), and State v. Baughman, 276 Or App 754 , 369 P3d 423 , rev allowed, 359 Or 847 (2016).

State v. Brown

31 Or. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1977

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 US 471 , 83 S Ct 407 , 9 L Ed 2d 441 (1963); State v. Evans, 16 Or App 189 , 517 P2d 1225 , Sup Ct review denied (1974); State v. … In Terry v.

State v. Brown

209 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 2006

State v. Holmes, 311 Or 400, 409-10 , 813 P2d 28 (1991). … In State v.

State v. Brown

273 Or. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 2015

Cook, 332 Or at 608 (articulating standard); see also State v. Brown, 348 Or 293, 302 , 232 P3d 962 (2010) (same). 4 They do not. … Brown, 348 Or at 301 (citing State v. Pidcock, 306 Or 335, 340-42 , 759 P2d 1092 (1988)).

Couey v. Brown

257 Or. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 2013

In Gaffey v. … In Brown [v.

State v. Brown

5 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 28, 1971

See State v. William D. … ORS 17.215; State v. Clipston, 237 Or 634, 645 , 392 P2d 772 (1964); State v. Weston, 102 Or 102, 113-15 , 201 P 1083 (1921). The conviction is affirmed. ① Subsequent to Miranda v.

Wolfe v. Brown

294 Or. App. 800 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2018

Prete v. … See Adams v. Board of Clinical Social Workers , 201 Or. App. 500 , 506, 119 P.3d 260 , rev. den. , 339 Or. 700 , 127 P.3d 1202 (2005) ("The relevance of evidence is a legal question that we review for errors of law.").

State v. Brown

200 Or. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2005

See Ailes v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 356 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (court exercised discretion to correct an error that could have meant the difference between life and death for the defendant); State v.

Hazell v. Brown

238 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 2010

State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009); see also Ecumenical Ministries v. … See Meyer v.

Richards v. Brown

345 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025

Affirmed. 322 Richards v. Brown EGAN, J. … No such exception exists for affirmative defenses. 328 Richards v. Brown prohibited special verdict.

State v. Brown

6 Or. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 1971

State v. Brown

106 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1991

Defendant Brown had shown the informant 10 clear plastic bags that she said contained methamphetamine. … See State v. Crotsley, 308 Or 272 , 779 P2d 600 (1989); State v. Owens, 102 Or App 448 , 450 n 2, 795 P2d 569 , rev den 311 Or 13 (1990); State v. Atkinson, supra.

Brown v. Dearborn

52 Or. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

In Lee v. Brown, 264 Or 341 , 505 P2d 924 (1973), it was used to support this proposition: "Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy at law to which the rules of procedure relating to actions at law are applicable.” … Justice Rossman, specially concurring in Lafferty v.

Brown v. Gatti

195 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2004

Timothy Brown.’ … Brown and is now going after the pages where Brown advertised.

State v. Brown

141 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1996

In State v. Meyrick, 313 Or 125 , 831 P2d 666 (1992), the court explained the characteristics of a valid waiver of the right to counsel under section 11. … ” Id. at 133-34 (footnote omitted; *162 emphasis supplied; see also State v. Cole, 323 Or 30 , 912 P2d 907 (1996)). 2.

Brown v. Zenon

133 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1995

Richmond, 31 Or App 553 , 570 P2d 1014 (1977), and State v. … See Delaney v. State of Oregon, 58 Or App 442, 445 , 648 P2d 1302 (1982); State v. Richmond, supra; State v. Watchman, supra.