Case law

Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

119 Or. App. 397 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993

Relying on our opinion in McKay v. … Withrow v. Larkin, 421 US 35 , 95 S Ct 1456, 43 L Ed 2d 712 (1975); Van Gordon v. Oregon State Bd of Dental Exam., 34 Or App 607, 613, 579 P2d 306 (1978); Palm Gardens, Inc. v.

BLAY v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

248 Or. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 2012

App. 755 BLAY v. BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGIST EXAMINERS. A149147. Court of Appeals of Oregon. March 14, 2012. Affirmed without opinion.

Queirolo v. Builders Board

66 Or. App. 743 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1984

The Board did not *746 consider the attorney’s letter a Statement of Claim. It was not required to do so. OAR 812-11-050(2)(b). 5 Affirmed. See also Langfus, Inc. v. … The Board will retain no record of such claims.

Ashcroft v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

192 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 2004

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) denying his request for discharge or conditional release. … As in Laing v.

Anderson v. Board of Medical Examiners

95 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1989

See ORS 677.415; Davidson v. Oregon Government Ethics Comm., 300 Or 415 , 712 P2d 87 (1985). … See McBeth v. Elliott, 42 Or App 783 , 601 P2d 871 (1979).

Palaia v. State Board of Parole

57 Or. App. 781 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 1982

In the petition he alleged that the Board had improperly applied aggravating factors in setting the release date. In an order dated August 3, 1981, the Board granted administrative review. … Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 614 P2d 602 , rev den 290 Or 157 (1980).

Cochran v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

171 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2000

We agree with petitioner that the Board’s order in this case does not meet the test of substantial reason. See Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491, 500-01 , 909 P2d 1211 (1996); Spray v. … See State v.

Wilson v. State Board

94 Or. App. 571 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 1989

PER CURIAM This is a petition for judicial review, pursuant to ORS 144.335, from a final order by the Oregon State Board of Parole (Board) relating to petitioner’s parole date set. … We remand to the Board to reconsider what percentage of reduction is appropriate under Jeldness v. Board of Parole, 92 Or App 323 , 759 P2d 1102 (1988). Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Samuel v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

77 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1985

Petitioner’s reliance on Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), is misplaced. … Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., supra, 290 Or at 224 . We have upheld the Board’s interpretation of the statute.

Murphy v. State Board

97 Or. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1989

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole that established his release date. … He argues, the state concedes, and we agree that the Board should instead have applied the rate of reduction to the term to which petitioner had been sentenced. Jeldness v.

Barnes v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

25 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 1976

Petitioner appeals the order of respondent Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (Board) sustaining his termination of employment with respondent school district. … The school board approved the recommendation of the superintendent. The respondent Board upheld the termination of petitioner’s employment by the respondent school district.

Bowen v. Public Employees Retirement Board

227 Or. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 15, 2009

In Lent v. … Wilkinson v.

Wisotsky v. State Board

62 Or. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1983

PER CURIAM Each petitioner, acting pro se, has filed a motion for appointment of counsel from outside the office of the Public Defender in proceedings to review final orders of the Board of Parole. ORS 144.335. … Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 US 1 , 99 S Ct 2100 , 60 L Ed 2d 668 (1979). We find none under the Oregon Constitution. Petitioners’ only right to representation is that granted by ORS 144.337.

Menges v. Board of County Commissioners

44 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

For the latter proposition, the city relies on our decisions in West v. City of Astoria, 18 Or App 212 , 524 P2d 1216 (1974), and Tierney v. Duris, Pay Less Properties, 21 Or App 613 , 536 P2d 435 (1975). … While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held in Neuberger v.

Zimmerman v. Builders Board

48 Or. App. 236 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1980

PER CURIAM Petitioner, a builder, seeks review of an order by the Builders Board that he pay claimant $3,500 as damages for breach of a construction contract. … Midwest Fabrication v. Woodex, Inc., 40 Or App 675 , 596 P2d 581 , rev den (1979). Reversed.

Hawkins v. Board of Medical Examiners

23 Or. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1975

Under the provisions of ORS ch 677, as it existed prior to the effective date of the 1975 additions, in order for the Board to discipline a licensee for incapacity, it was necessary for the Board to reach that conclusion … Newspaper Pub. v.

Lee v. Appraiser Certification & Licensure Board

160 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1999

Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132, 134 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). The Board’s undisputed findings of fact are as follows: 4 “[Petitioner] is a licensed appraiser in Montana. … Motor Trucking Co. v. Bur. of Labor, 64 Or App 361, 368 , 668 P2d 446 , rev den 295 Or 773 (1983). For the foregoing reasons, the Board’s final order on reconsideration is affirmed.

State v. Brown

350 Or. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

Affirmed. 530 State v. Brown KAMINS, J. … Brown that he had pills in the container. See State v.

Hinkley v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

189 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2003

Patterson v. Wasner, 128 Or App 254, 256 , 875 P2d 506 (1994); Johnson v. … See also Reynolds v.

Hardt v. Board of Naturopathic Examiners

44 Or. App. 679 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1980

Nor is there reference to the rofessional knowledge of the Board as permitted by )RS 183.450(4). Cf. Gregg v. Racing Comm’n, 38 Or App 19 , 588 P2d 1290 (1979). The finding is therefore msupported and invalid. … Petitioner’s contention anticipated the ruling of the Supreme Court in Megdal v.