Case law

Rodriguez v. Board of Parole

91 Or. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1988

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of the Parole Board’s order rescinding his parole release date made after his return from an escape, and resetting his parole release date to August 31, 1988. … The Board took that action, which resulted in a 180-day sanction for his escape, without granting him a hearing.

Orr v. Civil Service Board

30 Or. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1977

Since petitioner admitted the relevant facts in the hearing before the chief of police, a full scale adversary hearing would have served no useful purpose and was not required by due process. 6 Codd v. … faith, for the purpose of improving the public service, the matter shall forthwith be investigated by or before the board, or by or before some officer or board appointed by the board to conduct such investigation.

Alonzo v. Board of Parole

24 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 1976

In this parole revocation proceeding the state concedes that the petitioner was not allowed to respond to all material considered by the Board and agrees that the Board should hold a further hearing for that purpose.

Miller v. Board of Parole

34 Or. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1978

Kniss v. Public Employees Retirement Board

184 Or. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 2002

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). In this case, claimant’s sole contention is that the board lacked sufficient reason to reject the opinion of his treating physicians. … See, e.g., Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp., 172 Or App 484, 488-89 , 19 P3d 951 (2001) (no rule of law requires deference to workers’ compensation claimant’s treating physician).

Bell v. Public Employees Retirement Board

239 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 2010

Ellis v. Ferrellgas, L. P., 211 Or App 648, 652, 156 P3d 136 (2007). … The court’s analysis in Loosli v.

Watson v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023

Reversed and remanded. 14 Watson v. Board of Parole AOYAGI, P. J. … Id.; see also Baker v.

Wallace v. Board of County Commissioners

105 Or. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1991

The Board of County Commissioners of Klamath County (county) appeals and intervenors cross-appeal a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring county to issue a conditional use permit. We reverse. … Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co., 111 Or 600, 606 , 227 P 310 (1924). (Citations omitted.)

Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners

51 Or. App. 773 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1981

Both parties have petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in Spray v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, 50 Or App 311 , 624 P2d 125 (1981). Rule 10.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure. … The petition of respondent Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is granted, and our former opinion is modified in the manner described below.

Hodgin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

113 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1992

hearing, because PSRB is required at that hearing to determine if a person under its jurisdiction may be discharged, which requires a finding of whether the person is affected by a mental disease or defect. 3 See Martin v. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); Valleur v. Psychiatric Review Board, 43 Or App 843, 845 , 604 P2d 439 (1979). Reversed and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Robinson v. Builders Board of Oregon

20 Or. App. 340 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1975

The Board in the context of ORS ch 701 makes orders under the Act; a court makes judgments. … That this was realized by the Board is illustrated by the fact that the Board refused to entertain petitioner’s claim until it had been reduced to a circuit court judgment. *344 There is no hint anywhere in the Act to indicate

Petrillo v. Public Employees Retirement Board

286 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 2017

City of Eugene v. PERB, Marion County Circuit Court Case Nos. 99C12794,00C-16173, 99C-12838, 99C-20235. The decision was appealed. City of Eugene v. … City of Eugene v. PERB, 341 Or 120, 127 , 137 P3d 1288 (2006).

Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

119 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) that continues his commitment at a state hospital. We affirm. … Baldwin v. PSRB, 97 Or App 367 , 370 n 5, 776 P2d 577 (1989). That statement is incorrect. All of the statutes governing PSRB’s jurisdiction and functions were enacted after 1971.

Clubb v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1992

Petitioner’s sole assignment of error is that the Board “erred in finding petitioner’s sentence expiration date as 5/23/1994.” He asks us to remand to the Board with instructions to correct the sentence expiration date. … The Department of Corrections, not the Board, is responsible for establishing the sentence expiration date. ORS 137.320. The Board is not even required to include the sentence expiration date on the BAF.

Martin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

103 Or. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 12, 1990

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) that ordered that he be continued under its jurisdiction. We affirm. … Baldwin v. PSRB, 97 Or App 367, 371 , 776 P2d 577 (1989). (First emphasis supplied; second emphasis in original.)

Tharp v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

188 Or. App. 763 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 2003

Rios v. PSRB, 176 Or App 252 , 30 P3d 1227 (2001), rev dismissed, 335 Or 505 (2003); Hanson v. PSRB, 156 Or App 198 , 965 P2d 1051 (1998), rev’d and rem’d on other grounds, 331 Or 626 , 19 P3d 350 (2001).

Sohappy v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023

State v. … The board had used the Static- 99R, or its predecessor the Static-99, since at least 2004 to help assess whether people qualified as “predatory sex offenders.” See V. L. Y. v.

Grobovsky v. Board of Medical Examiners

213 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2007

Hawes v. DEQ, 203 Or App 255, 264-65 , 125 P3d 778 (2005). … See Anderson v.

Kragt v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2023

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion adhered to. 26 Kragt v. Board of Parole AOYAGI, P. J. Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Kragt v. … Board of Parole, 325 Or App 688, 529 P3d 1019 (2023), asking that we reconsider our award of costs to the board as the prevailing party. Analogizing to Gutierrez v.

Miller v. Board of Nursing

115 Or. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

He argues that the Board failed to explain how it found that he is likely to invade the privacy and offend the dignity of patients. In Dennis v. … The legislature authorized the Board to adopt rules that define conduct derogatory to the standards of nursing, ORS 678.150(10) and ORS 678.150(7)(h), and the Board has. See Megdal v.