Case law

Krisor v. Lake County Fair Board

256 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2013

Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 139-40 , 795 P2d 531 (1990); Shuler v. … Peterson v. Temple, 323 Or 322, 327 , 918 P2d 413 (1996).” State ex rel English v. Multnomah County, 348 Or 417, 432 , 238 P3d 980 (2010).

Adams v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

45 Or. App. 997 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1980

State v. … See also, Valleur v. Psychiatric Review Board, 43 Or App 843, 847 , 604 P2d 439 (1979).

Gantenbein v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

33 Or. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 1978

judge may elect to qualify for the benefits herein provided effective as of any date between which such district judge first took office, and the effective date of this Act, by filing with the Public Employes’ Retirement Board … In Taylor v. Mult. Dep. Sher. Ret.

Perkey v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

65 Or. App. 259 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1983

Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); Calder v. Bull, 3 US (3 Dall.) 386 , 1 L Ed 648 (1798). … In re Willow Creek, 74 Or 592, 144 P 505 , 146 P 475 (1915) (statute created a board of control with power to determine water rights); Evanhoff v. State Industrial Acc.

State v. Brown

335 Or. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 2024

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 418 State v. Brown SHORR, P. J. … Considering defendant’s argument on its merits, in State v.

State v. Brown

335 Or. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 2024

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. 418 State v. Brown SHORR, P. J. … Considering defendant’s argument on its merits, in State v.

Brown v. Collette

342 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 2025

Hannah Brown argued the cause and filed the brief pro se. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. EGAN, J. Reversed and remanded. 516 Brown v. … The court explained it would order father to complete 518 Brown v. Collette a treatment program to address his alcohol use.

Hernandez v. Brown

346 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025

Nichole BROWN, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. … Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US 83, 93, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020).

Beistel v. PUBLIC EMPLOYE RELATIONS BOARD

6 Or. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1971

Warren v. … Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Miesen v. Dept. of Commerce, 3 Or App 251 , 473 P2d 691 (1970).

Clubb v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1992

Petitioner’s sole assignment of error is that the Board “erred in finding petitioner’s sentence expiration date as 5/23/1994.” He asks us to remand to the Board with instructions to correct the sentence expiration date. … The Department of Corrections, not the Board, is responsible for establishing the sentence expiration date. ORS 137.320. The Board is not even required to include the sentence expiration date on the BAF.

Burbank v. Board of Parole

92 Or. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1988

PER CURIAM The parties agree that the matter for which petitioner seeks judicial review has been corrected by the Board of Parole and that the issues presented are moot. Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Rodriguez v. Board of Parole

91 Or. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1988

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of the Parole Board’s order rescinding his parole release date made after his return from an escape, and resetting his parole release date to August 31, 1988. … The Board took that action, which resulted in a 180-day sanction for his escape, without granting him a hearing.

Duncan v. Board of Parole

109 Or. App. 678 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1991

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Parole Board, without having sought administrative review of that order. ORS 144.335(1). … He does not claim that the Board gave him incorrect information about appeal procedures. See Jenkins v. Board of Parole (CA A65131), dismissed by order June 6, 1991, rev allowed (September 24, 1991).

Dunham v. Board of Parole

109 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1991

At his prison term hearing, the Parole Board established a history/risk score of 2, a crime severity rating of 4 and a matrix range of 32 to 44 months. … It is agreed that, if the Board had applied one standard variation, which is six months, his prison term would have been set at 26 months.

Kniss v. Public Employees Retirement Board

184 Or. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 2002

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). In this case, claimant’s sole contention is that the board lacked sufficient reason to reject the opinion of his treating physicians. … See, e.g., Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp., 172 Or App 484, 488-89 , 19 P3d 951 (2001) (no rule of law requires deference to workers’ compensation claimant’s treating physician).

Bell v. Public Employees Retirement Board

239 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 2010

Ellis v. Ferrellgas, L. P., 211 Or App 648, 652, 156 P3d 136 (2007). … The court’s analysis in Loosli v.

Alonzo v. Board of Parole

24 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 1976

In this parole revocation proceeding the state concedes that the petitioner was not allowed to respond to all material considered by the Board and agrees that the Board should hold a further hearing for that purpose.

Eggsman v. State Board of Parole

60 Or. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 24, 1982

Folk v. Board of Parole, 53 Or App 142, 145 , 631 P2d 353 (1981). … Board of Parole, 53 Or App 142 , 631 P2d 353 (1981); Harris v.

Erickson v. Board of Parole

113 Or. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 1992

Gould v. Board of Parole

111 Or. App. 658 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1992