Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.25s
Montgomery v. Board of Education
188 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 2003
In Aiken v. … Ass’n of Machinists v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedYankee v. Oregon Medical Board
280 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2016
Petitioner seeks judicial review of a default final order of the Oregon Medical Board (the board) that revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine and assessed a civil penalty. … The board responds that “the rule required the board determine, as a factual matter, whether there was any dispute over petitioner’s reasons for not appearing at the hearing,” and that the board correctly stated and applied
Cited 1 timesPublished118 Or. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1993
In August, 1988, petitioner filed for administrative review of the Board’s order, asserting that the Board should have “unsummed” the consecutive sentences. The Board granted the request for review. … See Jamison v. Cupp, 27 Or App 109 , 555 P2d 475 (1976). He should be permitted to petition for a rehabilitation hearing at any time after July, 2005. Petitioner’s remaining assignments are without merit.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSowell v. Workmen's Compensation Board
2 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1970
In Re Clark, 79 Or 325 , 154 P 748 , 155 P 187 (1916); State ex rel Venn v. Reid, 207 Or 617 , 298 P2d 990 (1956); and Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308 , 365 P2d 89 (1961). … In Riesland v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedHarrington v. Board of Trustees
100 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 1990
McCay v. Linn County, 90 Or App 271 , 752 P2d 323 (1988); Pounds v. Board of Trustees, 89 Or App 552, 555 , 749 P2d 1227 (1988). … Lewis v. Dept. of Rev., 294 Or 139, 142 , 653 P2d 1265 (1982); Mayer/Kelinknecht v. Bassett, 263 Or 334, 348 , 501 P2d 782 *738 (1972).
Cited 5 timesPublished115 Or. App. 91 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of our decision dismissing his petition for review of an order of the Board of Parole. 111 Or App 662 , 825 P2d 663 (1992). … See Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). We conclude that petitioner’s claims of error are not well taken and do not require discussion. Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDinkins v. Board of Accountancy
118 Or. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1993
The Board relies, inter alia on Trebesch v. Employment Division, 300 Or 264 , 710 P2d 136 (1985), Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment Div., 105 Or App 233 , 804 P2d 1133 , rev den 311 Or 433 (1991), and Sun Veneer v. … Also, relying on McKay v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 2024
Further, the board argues that this case is like Lewis-Taylor v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Portland School District No. 1
48 Or. App. 571 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1980
We concluded in Yunker v. … See Dowers Farms v.
Reversed on other grounds by Brown v. Portland School District No. 1, 291 Or. 77 (1981)Cited 11 timesPublished114 Or. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1992
We rejected that argument in Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). Petitioner exhausted his administrative remedies. We have jursidiction. … Petitioner contends that the Board erred in finding aggravation under factor O — consecutive sentences.
Cited 3 timesPublished114 Or. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 5, 1992
Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 510 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). Petitioner challenges the condition barring him from entering or residing in Polk or Yamhill counties during the period of parole supervision. … Owens v. Board of Parole, supra, 113 Or App at 511-12 . See also State v. Ferre, 84 Or App 459, 461-62 , 734 P2d 888 (1987).
Cited 2 timesPublishedFields v. Workmen's Compensation Board
26 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 1976
Com., 227 Or 562 , 362 P2d 371 , 363 P2d 563 (1961); Hoffmeister v. State I. A. Com., 176 Or 216, 223-24 , 156 P2d 834 (1945); Verban v. State Ind. Acc. Com., supra; Bowser v. … Dodd v. Ind. Acc. Com., 211 Or 99, 107 , 310 P2d 324 , 311 P2d 458 , 315 P2d 138 (1957); Dinnocenzo v. SAIF, 18 Or App 63, 69 , 523 P2d 1280 (1974); Bowser v. Evans Products Co., supra, 17 Or App at 545 .
Cited 2 timesPublished62 Or. App. 628 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1983
Petitioner appeals from an order of the Board of Parole (Board) establishing his history risk score, crime category and his matrix range. … When he appeared before the Board pursuant to ORS 144.120, the Board set his history risk score at 4, his crime category at 4 and his matrix range at 22 to 30 months.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNacey v. Board of Massage Therapists
287 Or. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 9, 2017
Wolff v. Board of Psychologist Examiners, 284 Or App 792, 800 , 395 P3d 44 (2017). … Wolff, 284 Or App at 805 (quoting Watts v. Board of Nursing, 282 Or App 705, 714 , 386 P3d 34 (2016)).
Cited 6 timesPublishedDamman v. Board of Commissioners
241 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011
This case concerns issues similar to those decided in Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 237 Or App 149 , 238 P3d 1016 (2010), rev allowed, 349 Or 602 (2011). … We have issued opinions in three of those companion cases: Friends of Yamhill County, Kleikamp, and Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 46 , 245 P3d 688 *328 (2010).
Cited 1 timesPublished200 Or. App. 514 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2005
Regarding that requirement, we explained in Ayres v. … Board of Parole, 313 Or 234, 239 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992)) (bracketed material in Eli). And in Garcia v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 21, 2024
Reversed and remanded. 448 Allen v. Board of Parole AOYAGI, P. J. … We recently held in Thomsen v.
Cited 0 timesPublished323 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2022
Morrison v. … .”); Rivas v. Board of Parole, 272 Or App 248, 253-54, 356 P3d 83 (2015) (same).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlbright v. Employment Appeals Board
32 Or. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1978
Plaintiff argues that under the "futility exception” discussed in Gilstrap v. Mitchell Bros. … We have noted before, see Tierney v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 2024
Further, the board argues that this case is like Lewis-Taylor v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna