Case law

Jeldness v. Board of Parole

90 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 1988

Petitioner contends that the Board violated its rules in two respects. … OAR 255-35-023(2) 1 requires that, if the Board overrides a minimum term, it must set a new initial release date in accordance with the matrix. See OAR 255-35-013; Anderson v.

Harris v. Board of Parole

39 Or. App. 913 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 1979

State v. Cooper, 37 Or App 443 , 587 P2d 1051 (1978). … In Sterling v.

Williams v. Board of Parole

98 Or. App. 716 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1989

Hill v. Board of Parole, 85 Or App 215 , 735 P2d 1301 (1987); Roof v. Board of Parole, 85 Or App 188 , 736 P2d 193 (1987). The Board amended OAR 255-35-022 and OAR 255-35-023 in 1987, in response to Hill and Roof . … Perkey v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, supra, 65 Or App at 262 ; see also ORS 144.780(2).

Williams v. Board of Parole

112 Or. App. 108 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1992

See, e.g., Glynn v. Augur, 678 F2d 760, 761 (8th Cir 1982); Dyke v. Meachum, 785 F2d 276 (10th Cir 1986); Milhouse v. Levi, 548 F2d 357, 364 (DC Cir 1976). The cases on which the Board relies are inapposite. … Raske v. Martinez, supra, 876 F2d at 1501 (quoting Weaver v. Graham, supra, 450 US at 33-34 ).

Hardy v. State Land Board

274 Or. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 2015

United States v. … See Oklahoma v.

Hessel v. Board of Parole

350 Or. App. 451 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

Board of Parole law.’ ” Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, 35, 540 P3d 568 (2023) (quoting OR-OSHA v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 312 Or App 424, 434, 494 P3d 959 (2021)); see also 1000 Friends of Oregon v. … Harris v. Board of Parole, 288 Or 495, 502, 605 P2d 1181 (1980).

Jones v. Board of Parole

350 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

In 2021, while he was still incarcerated, petitioner received a commutation from Governor Kate Brown. … We review the board’s order for legal error, Morrison v.

Justice v. Builders Board

47 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 1980

The premises were inspected by a Board representative, and after a hearing before the Board, the hearings officer found that the claimed defects did exist and ordered petitioners to pay damages. … The Builder’s Board had jurisdiction of this controversy.

Brown v. MORTUARY AND CEMETERY BD.

94 P.3d 913 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 2004

94 P.3d 913 (2004) 193 Or.App. 822 BROWN, SPIELBERG, CULP & VANPORT MEMORIAL FUNERAL DIRECTOR, INC. v. MORTUARY AND CEMETERY BD. BROWN v. MORTUARY AND CEMETERY BD. Court of appeals of Oregon. June 9, 2004.

Jeldness v. Board of Parole

92 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1988

The Board of Parole petitions for review and asks that we reconsider our previous decision. 90 Or App 135 , 751 P2d 243 (1988). … The Board initally decided not to override petitoner’s judicially imposed minimum sentence and established an initial prison term for him which reflected the minimum sentence.

Williams v. Board of Parole

107 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 1991

See Calder v. Bull, 3 US (3 Dall) 386, 390, 1 L Ed 648 (1798); Williams v. Board of Parole, supra. This case is not controlled by our decision on the rules in Howard v. … See Weaver v. Graham, 450 US 24 , 101 S Ct 960 , 67 L Ed 2d 17 (1981); Lindsey v. Washington, 301 US 397, 401-02 , 57 S Ct 797 , 81 L Ed 1182 (1937); Raske v.

Mitchell v. Board of Education

64 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 1983

On January 12,1981, the board decided not to renew plaintiffs contract for the 1981-82 year. The plaintiff did not attend that board meeting because, on that day, he entered a hospital for open heart surgery. … The only remaining issue is whether plaintiff actually received any written notice. 3 In Ambrose v.

Harless v. Board of Parole

348 Or. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 8, 2026

Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v. … Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, 41, 540 P3d 568 (2023) (internal quo- tation marks omitted).

Jillie v. Board of Parole

348 Or. App. 133 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 1, 2026

ORS 144.102(4)(b); see also Crombie v. Board of Parole, 325 Or App 312, 314-15, 528 P3d 1171 (2023) (so noting). … Penn v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 607, 635, 451 P3d 589 (2019); Martin v.

Crouse v. Workmen's Compensation Board

26 Or. App. 849 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 20, 1976

The rule is valid if it is within the legislative delegation of authority, Angelos v. Bd. of Dental Examiners, 244 Or 1 , 414 P2d 335 (1966); Ore. Newspaper Publ. v. … The legislative purpose is to facilitate the employment of disabled persons and the Board has authority to regulate to that end. Harry & David v. Work. Comp. Bd., 6 Or App 566 , 488 P2d 829 (1971).

Erbs v. Board of Parole

90 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 6, 1988

The Board never set a parole release date, because petitioner continually waived such release. On February 18, 1986, a “Board Action Form” noted: “Inmate had previously waived Parole release. … Given the undisputed violations of the conditions imposed, the Board contends that he was properly returned to prison. However, the Board did not grant parole on the basis that petitioner’s prison term had not expired.

Charlemagne v. Board of Parole

347 Or. App. 769 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 2026

We review the board’s order for legal error, Morrison v. … Millkey’s report thus lacked the necessary prerequisite for the board’s conclusion. See also Newcomb v.

Guzman v. Board of Parole

346 Or. App. 784 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2026

See Brown v. … (emphasis in Brown), meaning “the sentence imposed by the sentencing court * * * represents the actual amount of time that an offender” will serve, subject to “certain reductions allowed by law,” State v.

Schade v. State Board

94 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1988

On the basis of that report, the Board ordered no change in petitioner’s release date. Petitioner seeks review of the Board’s order. We affirm. … Accordingly, the Board did not err in issuing its order. Affirmed.

Corcoran v. Board of Nursing

197 Or. App. 517 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2005

See, e.g., Kniss v. PERB., 184 Or App 47, 52 , 55 P3d 526 (2002). … Becklin v. Board of Examiners for Engineering, 195 Or App 186, 204-05 , 97 P3d 1216 (2004), rev den, 338 Or 16 (2005).