Case law

Brown v. City of Eugene

250 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2012

Portland Police Assn v. Civil Service Board, 292 Or 433, 440 , 639 P2d 619 (1982). … Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219, 240 , 264 P3d 1265 (2011) (context of referred statute includes “statutory framework within which the law was enacted”); English v.

Brown v. Oregon State Penitentiary

22 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 17, 1975

Brown v. City of Portland

140 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 1996

Old Republic Surety Co. v. McIlwain, 115 Or App 615, 618 , 839 P2d 743 (1992). We review the court’s decision for abuse of its discretion. Pacheco v. … Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of Portland, 317 Or 192, 199 , 855 P2d 151 (1993).

Brown v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

105 Or. App. 92 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1990

.” *95 In Rogers v. … Livesley Co. v. Russ, 296 Or 25, 29 , 672 P2d 337 (1983). Both Stark v. State Industrial Acc. Com., supra, and SAIF v. Noffsinger, supra, are not to the contrary.

BBC Brown Boveri v. Lusk

108 Or. App. 623 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 1991

BBC Brown Boveri (BBC) and Aetna Insurance Company (Aetna), its insurer, seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that set aside their denial of claimant’s hearing loss claim and held them responsible for that condition … In Dykes v.

Brown v. Adult & Family Services Division

75 Or. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 21, 1985

Cook v. Employment Division, 47 Or App 437, 441 , 614 P2d 1193 (1980). … See Kuykendall v. AFSD, 70 Or App 526 , 530 n 2, 690 P2d 517 (1984).

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Brown

297 Or. App. 192 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2019

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, The , fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Holders of the Certificates, First Horizon Mortgage Pass-through Certificates Series Fhams 2005-FA7, by First Horizon Home Loans v. … BROWN et al and Reeves, occupants of the property and Styler, as trustee of the Angels Farm Trust dated September 28, 2010 et al Affirmed without opinion.

Guzek v. Board of Parole

325 Or. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 2023

Noble v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 485, 498, 964 P2d 990 (1998). … Washington v. Board of Parole, 294 Or App 497, 498, 432 P3d 372 (2018); Edwards v.

Green v. Board of Parole

308 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 2020

PER CURIAM Affirmed. 160 Green v. Board of Parole PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. … Those arguments run contrary to our decisions in Grimm v. Board of Parole, 258 Or App 595, 598, 310 P3d 736 (2013), rev den, 354 Or 699 (2014), and McCline v.

Schaefer v. Oregon Aviation Board

312 Or. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 2021

Reversed and remanded. 318 Schaefer v. Oregon Aviation Board ARMSTRONG, P. J. … See also Zimmerman v.

Jacobs v. Board of Parole

342 Or. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 2025

See Marteeny v. Brown, 321 Or App 250, 253, 517 P3d 343, rev den, 370 Or 303 (2022) (discussing history of the litigation). … Brown, 321 Or App 250, 253, 517 P3d 343, rev den, 370 Or 303 (2022). 54 Jacobs v. Board of Parole own design—which occurred eleven months before coun- sel’s appointment.

Thoren v. Builders Board

21 Or. App. 148 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1975

See Robinson v. Builders Board, 20 Or App 340 , 531 P2d 752 (1975). The petitioner complains that he had no opportunity to cross-examine the real parties in interest, namely, the Penns. … However, OES 188.480(7) provides that this court may “affirm, reverse or remand the order * * It was within the Board’s authority and discretion and we have no authority to modify it. Remodeling Consult. v.

Brown v. Multnomah County District Court

29 Or. App. 917 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 30, 1977

In Van de Wiele v. … Rose v. Hoffman, Judge, 227 Ind 256, 85 NE2d 486 (1949); Gillespie v.

Kragt v. Board of Parole

327 Or. App. 25 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2023

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion adhered to. 26 Kragt v. Board of Parole AOYAGI, P. J. Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Kragt v. … Board of Parole, 325 Or App 688, 529 P3d 1019 (2023), asking that we reconsider our award of costs to the board as the prevailing party. Analogizing to Gutierrez v.

Brown v. City of Grants Pass

291 Or. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 2018

Rogue Valley Sewer Services v. City of Phoenix , 357 Or. 437 , 451, 353 P.3d 581 (2015). … State v. Webb , 324 Or. 380 , 386, 927 P.2d 79 (1996) (describing principle). As we recently explained in Price v. Lotlikar , 285 Or.

Brown v. Oregon College of Education

52 Or. App. 251 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

The board in lieu of affirming the action, may modify it by directing a suspension without pay for a given period, and a subsequent restoration to duty, or a demotion in classification, grade or pay.* * *” In Thompson v. … App. 643 , (1977) to the extent it applied to this Board’s factfinding authority.) "The difficulty in applying the 'test’ is typified in the court’s divided opinion in James v. Employment Division, 20 Or.

Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.

64 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1983

We held in State v. … Uihlein v. Albertson’s, Inc., supra. We view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the prevailing party. Benassi v. Georgia-Pacific, 62 Or App 698 , 662 P2d 760 (1983).

Brown v. Motor Vehicles Division

157 Or. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 1998

In State v. … See, e.g., Winroth v.

Kragt v. Board of Parole

325 Or. App. 688 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2023

KRAGT, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … See State v.

Seaton v. Builders Board

29 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1977

Garbade and Boynton v. City of Portland, 188 Or 158 , 214 P2d 1000 (1950), overruled on other grounds Multnomah Co. v. Mittleman, 275 Or 545 , 552 P2d 242 (1976). … Robinson v. Builders Board, 20 Or App 340 , 531 P2d 752 (1975). The remaining assignment of error does not warrant discussion. See In re Idleman’s Commitment, 146 Or 13 , 27 P2d 305 (1933). Affirmed.