Case law

State v. L. BROWN

115 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

See State v. Walton, 311 Or 223, 240-41 , 809 P2d 81 (1991). Affirmed. 1 ORS 137.40 was also amended by Or Laws 1991, ch 630 and Or Laws 1991, ch 731.

Dillard v. Brown

297 Or. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2019

Dillard v. Premo , 296 Or. App. 798 , --- P.3d ---- (2019).

State v. Brown

245 Or. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 8, 2011

The trial court’s ruling was predicated on our decision in State v. Machuca, 231 Or App 232 , 218 P3d 145 (2009) (Machuca I). … State v. Machuca, 347 Or 644, 657 , 227 P3d 729 (2010) (Machuca II) (emphasis in original). This case is materially indistinguishable from Machuca.

Merrill v. Johnson

155 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1998

The issue that plaintiff raises is the same as the issue decided by this court in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12 , 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 17, 1998.

State v. Brown

240 Or. App. 313 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

On appeal, defendant contends that, under State v. … Reversed and remanded. 1 The trial court’s admission of the disputed evidence was predicated, in part, on our disposition in State v.

State v. PERKINS-BROWN

245 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 2011

App. 165 STATE v. PERKINS-BROWN. No. A143203 Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 17, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. Washington County

163 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1999

No warrant was issued until Mazikowski requested a warrant from the Parole Board on February 17, seven days after Brown’s escape. … Greist v.

Brown v. Employment Dept.

237 Or. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

App. 575 BROWN v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT. A143365 Court of Appeals of Oregon. September 29, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

HOEPER-BROWN v. Howton

235 Or. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 2010

App. 380 HOEPER-BROWN v. HOWTON. A142683. Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 26, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. Employment Dept.

235 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 2010

App. 339 BROWN v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT. A140744 Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 12, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.

SAIF Corp. v. Brown

177 Or. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 2001

See SAIF v. Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445-46 , *119 978 P2d 407 (1999) (summarizing employer’s arguments). … See Benz v. SAIF, 170 Or App 22, 27-28 , 11 P3d 698 (2000).

Snyder v. ESPINO-BROWN

235 Or. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 2010

Takata v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 217 Or App 454, 458 , 176 P3d 415 (2008) (citing Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 693 , 159 P3d 1151 (2007)). … The Supreme Court first construed ORS 12.155 in Duncan v. Dubin, 276 Or 631 , 556 P2d 105 (1976).

Robin v. Teacher Standards & Practices Comm'n

291 Or. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

We recently addressed a related but not identical argument in Dixon v. Oregon State Board of Nursing , 291 Or.App. 207 , 419 P.3d 774 (2018). … Board of Parole , 356 Or. 186 , 195, 335 P.3d 828 (2014) (quoting Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19 , 294 Or. 357 , 370, 657 P.2d 188 (1982) ).

Brown v. MacDonald & Associates, LLC

260 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2013

There is no evidence of recent misconduct by her, but [Brown’s] sons are understandably concerned * * On appeal, this court affirmed without opinion. Brown v. Brown, 233 Or App 227 , 224 P3d 708 (2009). … State v.

Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile

95 Or. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1989

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … Therefore, we hold that the Board did not err in reversing the referee’s award of permanent total disability. Affirmed.

Brown v. Guard Publishing Co.

267 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2014

In Turner v. … State v.

Brown v. Parks & Recreation Dep't

296 Or. App. 886 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2019

In Smith v. … See Stewart v. Kralman , 240 Or.

State v. Brown

203 Or. App. 616 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 2006

After the trial court granted defendants’ motion, we held in State v. … Defendants cross-appeal, assigning as error the admission of evidence found during a search of a shed on the property of defendant Brown’s mother. We affirm the trial court’s decision on that issue without discussion.

State v. Brown

285 Or. App. 872 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2017

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing those amounts, based on our decision in State v. Williams, 280 Or App 631 , 380 P3d 1225 , rev den, 360 Or 604 (2016).

Brown v. Infotec Development, Inc.

88 Or. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1987

See, e.g., United States v. Studley, 783 F2d 934 (9th Cir 1986); Borroughs v. Wallingford, 780 F2d 502 (5th Cir 1986); Newman v. Schiff 778 F2d 460 (8th Cir 1985); United States v. Romero, 640 F2d 1014 (9th Cir 1981).