Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

1.42s

  • Local 1724B, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Board of County Commissioners

    5 Or. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1971

    Lane County v. Heintz Const. Co. et al, 228 Or 152, 157 , 364 P2d 627 (1961). … Co. et al v. Portland et al, 196 Or 551, 565 , 249 P2d 175 , 250 P2d 929 (1952).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Contreras v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    297 Or. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2019

    We review the board's order for substantial evidence and reason. Jenkins v. … Board of Parole , 327 Or. 147 , 157, 957 P.2d 1210 (1998) ); see also Washington v. Board of Parole , 294 Or.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Payne v. Department of Commerce

    61 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1982

    Board of Comm, of Clackamas County v. LCDC, 35 Or App 725 , 582 P2d 59 (1978). ERB is not statutorily authorized to set aside a dismissal for failure of the dismissing agency to comply with a personnel rule. … Hammer v. OSP, supra, 276 Or at 655; Tupper v. Fairview Hospital, supra, 276 Or at 665. Affirmed. Payne is a respondent in this case, as is ERB.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harry and David v. Workmen's Compensation Bd.

    6 Or. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 1971

    Moreover, given its mandate from the legislature to make such rules as may be required to manage the fund, we believe the Board acted in a reasonable manner in filling the gap left by the statute. Ore. Newspaper Pub. v. … Bellucci v. Tip Top Farms, Inc., 24 NY2d 416 , 301 NYS2d 14 , 248 NE2d 864 (1969).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hibbs v. Sedwick CMS (A180289)

    340 Or. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 2025

    State v. Browning, 282 Or App 1, 3, 386 P3d 192 (2016), rev den, 361 Or 311 (2017) (inter- nal quotation marks omitted). … See McClusky v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fields v. Jantec, Inc.

    115 Or. App. 350 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

    In Fuhrer v. … Dahl v. BMW, 304 Or 558, 566 , 748 P2d 77 (1987). The trial court erred when it granted summary judgment to Jantec and Brown. Reversed and remanded as to Jantec, Inc., and Edgar C. Brown; otherwise affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    291 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 2018

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Ferry v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    293 Or. App. 216 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 2018

    See *222 Martin v. … The board therefore usually must consider less restrictive options. Compare State v. McSweeney , 123 Or.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Dixon

    5 Or. App. 113 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1971

    As defendant put his hand in his left jacket pocket, the motion spread his outer jacket and Officer Johnson saw some brown leather underneath which appeared to be a brown jacket. … Several of these Negro men boarded a bus wMch departed at about 8:30 p.m. No confrontation between police and any of tMs group occurred at the bus depot.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Oregon Department of Motor Vehicles

    195 Or. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2004

    See Ensley v. … National Bank v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J

    76 Or. App. 146 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1985

    Brown, 366 US 599 , 81 S Ct 1144 , 6 L Ed 2d 563 (1961) (uniform application of Sunday closing laws); Prince v. … Everson v. Board of Education, 330 US 1 , 67 S Ct 504 , 91 L Ed 711 (1947) (Establishment clause); Cantwell v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wright v. SAIF Corp. (In re Wright)

    295 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 2018

    In Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. … On review, claimant raised a second assignment of error, but concedes that that issue was resolved in Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017). We accept claimant's concession.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Paine v. Widing Transportation

    59 Or. App. 185 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

    Claimant’s situation differs from that in Brown v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 52 Or App 191 , 627 P2d 1291 (1981), in which we held that the claim was prematurely closed. … See Morris v. Denny’s, 50 Or App 533 , 623 P2d 1118 , clarified 53 Or App 863 , 633 P2d 827 (1981). In determining the extent of partial disability, we generally defer to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Owen v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Keystone RV - Thor Industries

    308 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 2020

    However, the board is not authorized to require an insurer to make an overpayment. See Lebanon Plywood v. … See Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591, 763 P2d 408 (1988) (applying legitimate doubt standard).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Martin

    221 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 2008

    State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). If those three criteria are satisfied, we must then determine whether to exercise our discretion to consider the error. Ailes v. … Brown, 310 Or at 355 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Worth

    274 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 2015

    .”); State v. Baucum, 268 Or App 649 , 664 n 17, 343 P3d 235 (2015) (declining to consider arguments pertaining to specific Brown/O’Key factors that were not raised before the trial court). … Allred v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 278 , 862 P2d 546 (1993). If not judicially imposed, the parole eligibility date was set by the Parole Board. ORS 144.228 (1971); Scott v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Winston-Dillard Firefighters Ass'n, Local 2091 v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

    39 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1979

    See Montgomery County Maryland v. Ball, 416 F Supp 737 (DC Md., 1975). The petitioners complied with every procedural requirement imposed by PERB, and a majority of the eligible employees voted in favor of termination. … The board may authorize its director, on behalf of and in the name of the board, to sign modifications of the agreement including within the agreement legally qualified eligible public agencies.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reynoldson v. Multnomah County

    189 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 27, 2003

    See, e.g., Brown v. … We therefore reverse and remand the case to the board for it to award claimant PPD at the proper rate.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jansen v. Atiyeh

    87 Or. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 1987

    Jansen v. Atiyeh, 302 Or 314 , 728 P2d 1382 (1986). Article XI-F(l) provides: “Section 1. … Thunderbird Motel v. City of Portland, 40 Or App 697 , 596 P2d 994 , rev den 287 Or 409 (1979).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Pendleton School District 16R

    73 Or. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

    See Bremer v. … For a full discussion as to the “no reasonable employer” test, see Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251, 254-256 , 628 P2d 410 (1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.