Case law

Smith v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.

292 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 6, 2018

Leanord v. Board of Directors of Jackson County Rural Fire District No. 3

71 Or. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 1984

Its purpose was explained in Hendrickson v. Civil Serv. … Wink v. Marshall, 237 Or 589, 592 , 392 P2d 768 (1964); Garner v. Garner, 182 Or 549, 561 , 189 P2d 397 (1948).

White v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

292 Or. App. 561 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

Knox v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd.

292 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 2018

Finley v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2018

Fisher v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2018

Gramada v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 7, 2023

FACTS The parties accept the findings of the board as sub- stantially accurate. We thus state the facts consistently with the board’s unchallenged factual findings. Magana-Marquez v. … See Brown v.

Batty v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

291 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 2018

Hamel v. Johnson

173 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2001

As our Supreme Court said in Penrod/Brown v. … Brown’s petition alleged that prison personnel had confiscated a number of his books.

Drenth v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2018

Jacobs v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2018

Learch v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 823 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2018

Balcom v. Knowledge Learning Enterprises

256 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2013

See State v. … See generally State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (setting forth prerequisites for plain error review); *622 Ailes v.

Fields v. Jantec, Inc.

115 Or. App. 350 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

In Fuhrer v. … Dahl v. BMW, 304 Or 558, 566 , 748 P2d 77 (1987). The trial court erred when it granted summary judgment to Jantec and Brown. Reversed and remanded as to Jantec, Inc., and Edgar C. Brown; otherwise affirmed.

Russell v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

9 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1972

See, e.g., Gibbs v. Multnomah County et al, 219 Or 84 , 346 P2d 636 (1959); In Re Estate of T. A. Stoll, 188 Or 682 , 214 P2d 345 , 217 P2d 595 (1950); Brown v. … No. 7 v.

Sunrise Electric, Inc. v. Ramirez

181 Or. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2002

We accordingly reverse the Board’s order and remand to permit it to clarify the basis for its decision. See Labor Force v. Frierson, 169 Or App 573, 578 , 9 P3d 128 (2000); SAIF v. … Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445-46 , 978 P3d 407 (1999). Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. 1 Both Sunrise Electric, Inc., and Farmers have petitioned for review of the Board’s order.

Scott v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

296 Or. App. 490 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 2019

Contreras v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

297 Or. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 2019

We review the board's order for substantial evidence and reason. Jenkins v. … Board of Parole , 327 Or. 147 , 157, 957 P.2d 1210 (1998) ); see also Washington v. Board of Parole , 294 Or.

Payne v. Department of Commerce

61 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1982

Board of Comm, of Clackamas County v. LCDC, 35 Or App 725 , 582 P2d 59 (1978). ERB is not statutorily authorized to set aside a dismissal for failure of the dismissing agency to comply with a personnel rule. … Hammer v. OSP, supra, 276 Or at 655; Tupper v. Fairview Hospital, supra, 276 Or at 665. Affirmed. Payne is a respondent in this case, as is ERB.

SAIF Corp. v. Belden

155 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1998

United Airlines, Inc. v. … SAIF also argues that our decisions in Amfac, Inc. v. Garcia-Maciel, 98 Or App 88, 92 , 778 P2d 967 (1989), and Gooderham v.