Case law

State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher Education v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.

69 Or. App. 456 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1984

In General Ins. v. Western Am. … See Mortgage Bancorp v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 67 Or App 261, 265 , 677 P2d 726 , rev den 297 Or 339 (1984); Cochran v. Connell, 53 Or App 933, 939 , 632 P2d 1385 , rev den 292 Or 109 (1981).

Kiltow v. SAIF Corp.

271 Or. App. 471 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 2015

On review, we reversed and remanded the board’s order, reasoning that the board was not precluded from considering the wage issue in the context of the aggravation claim. Drews v. … See Brown v. SAIF, 262 Or App 640 , 325 P3d 834 , rev allowed, 356 Or 397 (2014) (so holding); ORS 656.005(7)(a) (defining “compensable injury”). Claimant cites Sheridan v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Arms

106 Or. App. 343 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1991

Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 592 , 763 P2d 408 (1988). The Board followed the correct legal standard: whether employer had a legitimate doubt as to its liability. … Employer challenges the Board’s findings, claiming that they are unsupported by substantial evidence and that they do not lead to the Board’s conclusion.

Petshow v. Farm Bureau Insurance

76 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 1985

Forney v. Western States Plywood, 297 Or 628 , 686 P2d 1027 (1984); Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 905 , 618 P2d 959 (1980); Uris v. Compensation Department, 247 Or 420 , 427 P2d 753 , 430 P2d 861 (1967). … Ins. v.

Cooper v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

294 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 19, 2018

Penn v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

290 Or. App. 935 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2018

Erwin v. Oregon State Bar

149 Or. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 1997

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citation omitted). … Prestress v.

Gray v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

289 Or. App. 643 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 28, 2017

Barrett v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

292 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

Sayers v. EMPLOYMENT DIV., STATE OF OREGON

59 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

This conclusion finds support in a statement made by the Supreme Court in Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 455 , 616 P2d 457 (1980). … Although the decision in Brown did not disturb this rule, the court noted: *281 “One difference between ORS 18.160 and ORS 656.319(1)(b) not noted in Sekermestrovich v.

Sentrol, Inc. v. Bronson

112 Or. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

There was substantial evidence to support the facts found by the Board, and it was not required to explain its reasons for disregarding the referee’s opinion on credibility. Erck v. … The Board erred by denying fees on that rationale. On remand, the Board should consider whether attorney fees are authorized by ORS 656.386. See Short v. SAIF, 305 Or 541 , 754 P2d 575 (1988); Shoulders v.

Knox v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

288 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 2017

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.

90 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1988

Holmes v. SAIF, 38 Or App 145 , 589 P2d 1151 (1979). In Wick v. … However, in Brown v.

Boise Joint Venture v. Moore

106 Or. App. 83 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1991

Brown was not interested for several reasons, one of which was the need to find a qualified tenant to operate it. The broker later contacted Brown and told him that defendant was interested in leasing the motel. … See Brown’s Tie & Lumber v. Chicago Title, 115 Idaho 56 , 764 P2d 423 (1988); Traylor v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc., 99 Idaho 560 , 585 P2d 970 (1978).

Tuckenberry v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

291 Or. App. 843 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 16, 2018

State v. Orsi/Gauthier

108 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1991

ORAP 5.45(2); State v. King, 307 Or 332 , 768 P2d 391 (1989); Tarwater v. Cupp, 304 Or 639 , 748 P2d 125 (1988). … ORAP 5.45(2); see State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); cf State v.

Wood v. Wasco Cnty.

294 Or. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 19, 2018

See City of Damascus v. Brown , 266 Or. App. 416 , 430, 337 P.3d 1019 (2014) ("Standing deals with who can bring a controversy before the court ***. … See Kay v. David Douglas Sch. Dist.

Central School District 13J v. Marion County District Boundary Board

94 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1988

The second is a petition for judicial review [to the Court of Appeals] within 60 days of the date when a boundary board’s order becomes final. ORS 330.101(6); ORS 183.482. Butte Creek School Dist. v. … State Board of Education, 91 Or App 308, 310 , 754 P2d 923 (1988). (Emphasis supplied.) See also Central School Dist. v. Marion District, 91 Or App 314 , 754 P2d 925 (1988).

Neuhaus v. Federico

12 Or. App. 314 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1973

Thus, we begin by considering the extent of a school board’s authority in this context. A school board, like any other agency of government, has only that authority granted by statute. Monaghan v. … Stull v. School Board of Western Beaver Jr.-Sr. H.S., 459 F2d 339 (3rd Cir 1972); Massie v. Henry, 455 F2d 779 (4th Cir 1972); Bishop v. Colaw, 450 F2d 1069 (8th Cir 1971); Richards v. Thurston, supra; Breen v.

SAIF Corp. v. Cessnun

161 Or. App. 367 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

See also Brown v. A-Dec, Inc., 154 Or App 244, 247 , 961 P2d 280 (1998) (applying the provisions of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) “in determining the compensability of an occupational disease”). … In Medford Corp. v.