Case law

Hartvigsen v. SAIF Corp. (In re Hartvigsen)

291 Or. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 2018

As a procedural matter, and citing the board's own orders and our opinion in Crawford v. SAIF , 241 Or. … See ORS 656.308 ; Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 280-81, 391 P.3d 773 (2017) (a claimant's right to benefits derives from accepted conditions or injuries).

Jackson County v. Employment Division

99 Or. App. 719 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1989

See Waddles Restaurants, Inc. v. Employment Div., 99 Or App 709 , 784 P2d 115 (1989); City of Grants Pass v. Employment Division, 94 Or App 328 , 765 P2d 237 (1988). Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. … That would have been George Brown. “Q. And you discussed the incident with Mr. Brown? “A. Yes, he’s my boss. He’s the director of the Juvenile Department. * * * “Q. Did Mr.

Town & Country Chrysler v. Mitchell

113 Or. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 1992

For example, in Brown v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … Just as we required an evaluation of the specific, injurious activity in Brown v. Liberty Northwest Ins.

Voorhies v. Wood, Tatum, Mosser

81 Or. App. 336 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986

Anderson v. Publishers Paper Co., 78 Or App 513, 517 , 717 P2d 635 , rev den 301 Or 666 (1986); see also Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 455 , 616 P2d 457 (1980). … Wagar v. Prudential Ins. Co., 276 Or 827, 833 , 556 P2d 658 (1976). The referee’s opinion stated that this case is “[n]ot unlike the cases of Wamsher v. Brooks Products, 26 Or App 835 , 554 P2d 573 (1976), and Fulop v.

Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.

148 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1997

The Board awarded claimant 75 percent permanent partial disability. *387 This court affirmed, Tee v. … ORS 174.010; Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247, 252 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).” Deluxe Cabinet Works v. Messmer, 140 Or App 548, 553 , 915 P2d 1053 , rev den 324 Or 305 (1996).

Phillips v. Department of Public Safety Standards & Training

275 Or. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 2015

ORS 181.640, in turn, directs DPSST to recommend, and the Board on Public Safety and Standards Training (BPSST) to establish, minimum standards for, among other things, moral fitness. 1 See Cuff v. … See Pete’s Mountain Homeowners v. Ore.

Kumley v. Polk County District Boundary Bd.

75 Or. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1985

Petitioners seek review of an order of the Polk County District Boundary Board (Board). ORS 183.482; ORS 330.101(6). … Messer v. Polk Co. Dist. Boundary Bd., 58 Or App 46, 50 , 646 P2d 1369 (1982). They did not.

Brooks v. Tube Specialties - TSCO International

300 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 2019

Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591, 763 P2d 408 (1988). … We review for errors of law whether the board applied the correct legal standard, and we review the board’s factual findings for substantial evidence. Brown, 93 Or App at 591; ORS 183.482 (8)(a), (c).

Wallace v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Board & Public Employees Retirement System

245 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 2011

Eppler v. … Ayres v.

State ex rel. Public Employees' Benefit Board v. Oregon Health & Science University

205 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2006

In UNUM Corporation v. … In Miller v. C. C.

Angle v. Bd. of Dentistry

294 Or. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 2018

The only case law interpreting ORS 679.170(6) is our decision in Morgan v. Board of Dentistry , 118 Or. … State v. Mayes , 220 Or. App. 385 , 395, 186 P.3d 293 (2008).

Wright Schuchart Harbor v. Johnson

133 Or. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1995

Great American Ins. v. General Ins., 257 Or 62, 72 , 475 P2d 415 (1970). See also Brown v. … State v. Meyrick, 313 Or 125, 132 , 831 P2d 666 (1992). Here, however, the Board did not engage in such an inquiry.

Wright v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd.

292 Or. App. 538 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2018

v. … See generally Coffey v.

Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry

189 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 24, 2003

Co. v. … Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), 131 Or App 538, 551 , 886 P2d 1033 (1994). On review, the Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Rushin v. McGee

156 Or. App. 481 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1998

Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978) (emphasis added). Our holding in Bollinger is the current law on the question presented. … Payton v.

Klutsenbeker v. Jackson County

185 Or. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 2002

Further, claimant argues that, under the rule announced in Georgia-Pacific v. … See Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 311 Or 519 , 815 P2d 1251 (1991). Nor does Piwowar help claimant. As we stated in Hill v.

Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

257 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2013

See, e.g., Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988) (applying that standard to attorney fee awards under what is now ORS 656.262(11) and under ORS 656.382(1)). … Saxton v. SAIF, 80 Or App 631, 633 , 723 P2d 355 , rev den, 302 Or 159 (1986); Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc., 80 Or App 233, 236 , 720 P2d 1345 , rev den, 302 Or 35 (1986); Bahler v.

Donaca v. Curry County

77 Or. App. 677 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1986

Hurst v. Board of Com’rs of Pulaski County,_Ind _, 476 NE2d 832, 833 (1985). … Brown, 410 So 2d 258 (La App 1982) (plaintiff’s view from stop sign obstructed by shrubs on private property); Stewart v.

Pierce v. Douglas School District No. 4

68 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 1984

Petitioner, the prevailing party in Pierce v. Douglas Sch. Dist. … See also Brown v. Adult and Family Services, 293 Or 6, 14 , 643 P2d 1266 (1982) (apparently accepting the Wasco County principle); cf. Valley and Siletz Railroad v.

SAIF Corp. v. Thompson

267 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2014

SAIF v. Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445 , 978 P2d 407 (1999) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, claimant experienced muscular discomfort in his right chest and neck while he was off duty. … See SAIF v.