Case law

Vann v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Newcomb v. Board of Parole

333 Or. App. 660 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 2024

NEWCOMB, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … Because he did not provide the board an opportunity to address the argument he makes on appeal, he neither pre- served it for review nor exhausted his administrative reme- dies. ORAP 5.45(1); Tuckenberry v.

Oregon Liquor Control Commission v. Employment Relations Board

52 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

OLCC relies on our holdings in Thompson v. … In Brown v. Oregon College of Education, 52 Or App 251 , 628 P2d 410 (1981), we held that, in reviewing agency disciplinary actions, ERB is to find as a fact whether a reasonable employer would have taken the action.

Kesler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Twitty v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993).

Reese v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993).

Bennett v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

125 Or. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1993

Petitioner argues that the Board failed to assess correctly his matrix range before deciding whether or not to uphold the minimum sentences. See Calderon-Pacheco v. … Board of Parole, 309 Or 454 , 788 P2d 1001 (1991); Howard v. Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991). We affirm.

Scenic Sites, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

33 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1978

Damascus Comm. *203 Church v. Clackamas Co., 32 Or App 3 , 573 P2d 726 (1978). … Columbia County v. O’Black, 16 Or App 147 , 517 P2d 688 , rev den (1974).

Cornell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

125 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1993

Glasser v. Board of Parole, 123 Or App 610 , 860 P2d 832 (1993); Jeldness v. Board of Parole, 92 Or App 323 , 759 P2d 1102 (1988).

Allen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision order that set his parole release date. ORS 144.335. … In Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993), we decided the issues presented by petitioner contrary to his position, holding that the Board may deny petitioner access to certain information.

Bernard v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

21 Or. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 1975

Plaintiff presses upon us in support of his argument Semler v. Oregon Dental Examiners, 148 Or 50 , 34 P2d 311 (1934), aff'd 294 US 608 , 55 S Ct 570 , 79 L Ed 1086 (1935). … (f# # # # * *47 “* * * Laughney v. Maybury, 145 Wash. 146 ( 259 P. 17 , 54 A.L.R. 393 ), is in keeping with onr views * * *.

McKenzie v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

115 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1992

At the outset, the Board argues that the order is not a final order, because it does not change the 12-month term of supervision imposed on petitioner’s 1989 convictions. It relies on Willaby v. … Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288, 292 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991). The Board imposed, a 12-month parole term in response to a parole violation.

LaTulippe v. Oregon Medical Board

325 Or. App. 424 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2023

M. v. … The board is cor- rect that, because it revoked petitioner’s license on multiple independent grounds, its order must be affirmed. See Roop v.

Walker v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

66 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 11, 1984

She relies on Tupper v. Fairview Hospital, 276 Or 657 , 556 P2d 1340 (1976), Jordan v. City Council of Lake Oswego, 49 Or App 31 , 618 P2d 1298 (1980), rev den 290 Or 491 (1981) and Crompton v. … See Teachers United for Fair Treatment v. Anker, 445 F Supp 469, 472 (EDNY 1977); Roseboro v. Fayetteville City Board of Education, 491 F Supp 113, 117 (ED Tenn 1978).

George v. Myers

169 Or. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 2000

Jackson asked plaintiff to move the boards. … German v.

Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk

219 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 2008

Plaintiffs, Crandon Capital Partners (Crandon) and Rae Ann Brown (Brown), owned shares of Willamette. “In November 2000, Weyerhaeuser offered to purchase all of Willamette’s outstanding shares for $48 per share. … Kahn v.

Committee of One Thousand to Re-Elect State Senator Walt Brown v. Eivers

61 Or. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1982

Defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground, among others, that the only evidence established that the allegedly false statements were with regard to Brown, not to plaintiff committee. … Although we are not bound by dictum in Supreme Court cases, the following quotation from a footnote in Comm, to Retain Judge Tanzer v.

Pulito v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

295 Or. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 9, 2019

Koblinski v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

295 Or. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 9, 2019