Case law

Moret v. Board of Parole

325 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2023

Submitted March 17, affirmed April 19, 2023 ANDREW GUY MORET, Petitioner, v. … Affirmed. 422 Moret v. Board of Parole AOYAGI, P. J. Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board).

Snyder v. SAIF Corp.

287 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2017

On review to determine whether the board applied the correct legal standard and, if so, whether substantial evidence supports the board’s finding that SAIF had a legitimate doubt about its liability, Brown v. … Brown, 93 Or App at 591 .

Eames v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

151 Or. App. 460 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1997

Luckey v. Board of Parole, 150 Or App 480 , 946 P2d 361 (1997).

Casper v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1993

Petitioner, who was represented by counsel before the Board, did not make either objection below. We do not reach petitioner’s unpreserved assignments of error. See State v. … Farmer, 317 Or 220 , 856 P2d 623 (1993); Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376 , 823 P2d 956 (1991); Northwest Advancement v.

Whitmire v. Oregon State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

21 Or. App. 139 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1975

Hickam v. Morgan, 9 Or App 25 , 495 P2d 1243 (1972). … Sanitary Authority v. Pac. Meat Co., supra. See also, Miller v. Medical Board, 33 Or 5 , 52 P 763 (1898). Affirmed.

Hessell v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

In Contreras v. … Similarly, in Washington v.

Hessell v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

In Contreras v. … Similarly, in Washington v.

Russell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

121 Or. App. 58 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1993

ORS 144.270 authorizes the Board to establish conditions of parole. … On review, the Board corrected that error. The restitution condition was originally imposed by the Board’s Order of Parole in 1988, three years after the releases were signed.

Ainsworth v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Gibson v. ESIS

316 Or. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2022

Carrillo v. SAIF, 310 Or App 8, 11, 484 P3d 398, rev den, 368 Or 560 (2021) (citing Brown v. … In Young v.

Davis v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 671 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Allred v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 278 , 862 P2d 546 (1993).

Landsing Property Corp. v. City of Portland Fire Code Board

94 Or. App. 154 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1988

ORS 34.100; Coffey v. Lane County, 75 Or App 399, 401 , 706 P2d 590 (1985). … Although petitioner appeals from the Board’s decision, the Board’s decision affirms and is based on the Marshal’s decision, so we will refer to the Marshal throughout the opinion.

Martin v. City of Portland

178 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2001

Browning and, at the request of employer, Dr. Montanero. … Bronco Cleaners v. Velazquez, 141 Or App 295, 297 , 917 P2d 539 (1996). Bronco Cleaners is illustrative.

Perez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

145 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 1996

Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327 , 912 P2d 403 , rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), and Gress v. … Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 , on recons 144 Or App 375 , 927 P2d 138 (1996). Affirmed.

Garratt v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

145 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 1996

Most of Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327 , 912 P2d 403 , rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), and Gress v. … Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 , on recons 144 Or App 375 , 927 P2d 138 (1996).

Duncan v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

124 Or. App. 675 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Wimber v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

138 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Holton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

138 Or. App. 186 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Rural Dell School District v. Board of Education

97 Or. App. 31 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1989

See Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). A provision that simply permits an “appeal” says little, if anything, about the scope of appellate review. … This case is different from Kumley v. Polk Co. Dist.

Shelton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).