Case law

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

188 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 26, 2003

Petitioner argues that the rule exceeds the board’s authority granted under ORS 144.223. … Or Const, Art I, §§ 8, 12; US Const, Amends I, V. We have previously rejected petitioner’s statutory argument in Gholston v. Palmateer, 183 Or App 7 , 51 P3d 617 (2002).

Jenkins v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

In 2021, petitioner’s sentence was commuted by Governor Kate Brown. … See Marteeny v. Brown, 321 Or App 250, 291, 517 P3d 343, rev den, 370 Or 303 (2022) (explaining effect of commutation).

Giba v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

185 Or. App. 231 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 27, 2002

Day v. Board of Parole, 184 Or App 409 , 56 P3d 495 (2002).

Barton v. Board of Parole

344 Or. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 2025

See Jacobs v. Board of Parole, 342 Or App 41, 49, ___ P3d ___ (2025) (“We review the board’s order for substantial evidence in the record. … See 640 Barton v. Board of Parole Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v.

Buchanan v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 458 Buchanan v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Rogers v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 456 Rogers v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Kenton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

180 Or. App. 548 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 2002

Petitioner has petitioned for judicial review of an administrative review response and the underlying Board action form, both of which were issued by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. … Quintero v. Board of Parole, 329 Or 319, 326 , 986 P2d 575 (1999).

Washington v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

268 Or. App. 774 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2015

Corgain v. … The Supreme Court has characterized the rule as giving the board “discretion to reconsider its own orders at any time.” Dawson/Fletcher v. Board of Parole, 346 Or 643, 648 , 217 P3d 1055 (2009); see also Lovelace v.

Schneider v. Emanuel Hospital

20 Or. App. 599 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1975

See Stamate v. Peterson, 250 Or 532 , 444 P2d 30 (1968); Moore v. Brown, Burke, 19 Or App 199 , 527 P2d 132 (1974). … SAIF, Stevens v. SAIF, Murphy v. SAIF, all supra, where no prejudice has resulted and where justice might otherwise be thwarted, we hold that jurisdiction for review was acquired by the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

Jenkins v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 134 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

In 2021, petitioner’s sentence was commuted by Governor Kate Brown. … See Marteeny v. Brown, 321 Or App 250, 291, 517 P3d 343, rev den, 370 Or 303 (2022) (explaining effect of commutation).

Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Bd.

289 Or. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 2017

See DCBS v. … See, e.g. , Waddill v.

Walters v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 453 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Watson v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 329 Or App 13, 19-20, 540 P3d 20 (2023). … Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Stevenson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

270 Or. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 2015

light of Mastriano v. … See City of Eugene v.

Durette v. Virgil

272 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 2015

She cites Dyer v. R. E. … State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 139 , 218 P3d 104 (2009); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 438-39 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). We ordinarily review a trial court’s ruling under OEC 403 for abuse of discretion. State v.

Snyder v. SAIF Corp.

287 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2017

On review to determine whether the board applied the correct legal standard and, if so, whether substantial evidence supports the board’s finding that SAIF had a legitimate doubt about its liability, Brown v. … Brown, 93 Or App at 591 .

Lewis v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

272 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 2015

final orders); Eli v. … Furthermore, as in Mastriano and Dawson/Fletcher , the board’s later order denying reopening and reconsideration is not a final order for purposes of judicial review. See Abraham v.

Fleming v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

261 Or. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 2014

Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 432, 438 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010). … In response, the board asserts that petitioner’s argument is not cognizable on judicial review because petitioner failed to raise it on administrative review. See Ayres v.

Gramada v. SAIF

326 Or. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 7, 2023

FACTS The parties accept the findings of the board as sub- stantially accurate. We thus state the facts consistently with the board’s unchallenged factual findings. Magana-Marquez v. … See Brown v.

Rogers v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 456 Rogers v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Flores v. Board of Parole

344 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 15, 2025

Bell v. Board of Parole, 283 Or App 711, 713, 391 P3d 907, rev den, 361 Or 645 (2017). … Penn v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 607, 635, 451 P3d 589 (2019); see also Schmult v.