Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

0.85s

  • Smith v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    217 Or. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2007

    App. 411 Smith v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. Court of Appeals of Oregon. December 26, 2007. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Palacios v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    210 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2007

    App. 467 PALACIOS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon January 10, 2007. Case affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    213 Or. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 20, 2007

    App. 587 CARROLL v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 20, 2007. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sexton v. Sky Lakes Medical Center

    314 Or. App. 185 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 2021

    Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 252, 391 P3d 773 (2017). … See, e.g., TriMet v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adsitt v. Clairmont Water District

    79 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1986

    On the other hand, employer’s board, when it adopted a job description for Browning’s position, deleted from her responsibilities supervision of the billing clerk. … McGarrah v. SAIF, 296 Or 145 , 675 P2d 159 (1983); Elwood v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    209 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 22, 2006

    App. 378 MURPHY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 22, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Keith Brown Lumber Yard v. Silver Wheel Freightlines, Inc.

    35 Or. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 1978

    Co. v. … Rodin Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., All F2d 682 (5th Cir 1973).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kelley v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    210 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2007

    App. 467 KELLEY v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Court of Appeals of Oregon January 10, 2007. Case affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Topaz v. Oregon Board of Examiners for Engineering & Land Surveying

    255 Or. App. 138 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 2013

    Petitioner relies on State v. … In Pierce v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lovelace v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION

    51 P.3d 1274 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2002

    LOVELACE, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POSTPRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A109610. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Motion to Dismiss August 17, 2001. Motion to Dismiss September 20, 2001. … Lovelace v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 183 Or.App. 283 , 51 P.3d 1269 (2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mendacino v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

    207 Or. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2006

    App. 436 MENDACINO v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. OREGON COURT OF APPEALS. August 23, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Northwest Connection, Inc. v. Board of Pharmacy

    108 Or. App. 320 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1991

    At its January, 1990, meeting, the State Board of Pharmacy (board) voted to hold a public hearing on ephedrine, which was then an over-the-counter drug. … Robertson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • E. Max Woodbury II v. CH2M Hill, Inc.

    173 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 2001

    Miller v. Georgia Pacific, 294 Or 750, 753 , 662 P2d 718 (1983). … Wilson v. P.G.E. Company, 252 Or 385, 390-92 , 448 P2d 562 (1968); Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or App 391, 396 , 946 P2d 324 (1997), rev den 327 Or 317 (1998).

    Reversed by Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc., 335 Or. 154 (2003)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Voyles

    280 Or. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 31, 2016

    State v. … State v. Brown, 348 Or 293, 300 , 232 P3d 962 (2010) (quoting Cook, 332 Or at 608 (brackets in Brown)).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility Commission

    157 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

    Petitioners O’Neil, Marbet and Utility Reform Project (collectively petitioners) were among the prevailing parties in Citizens’ Utility Board v. … See generally State Land Board v. Sovenko et al, 202 Or 571, 574-81 , 277 P2d 781 (1954).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Complying Status of Flyways, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Board

    33 Or. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1978

    Carson v. State Indus. Acc. Comm., 152 Or 455 , 54 P2d 109 (1936).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Demeyer v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

    203 Or. App. 808 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 18, 2006

    App. 808 DEMEYER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. Oregon Court of Appeals. January 18, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stogsdill v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

    204 Or. App. 779 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006

    App. 779 STOGSDILL v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION Oregon Court of Appeals. March 15, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • V. L. Y. v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    188 Or. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 2003

    Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 US 244, 266 , 114 S Ct 1483 , 128 L Ed 2d 229 (1994); see United States v. Brown, 381 US 437, 445 , 85 S Ct 1707 , 14 L Ed 2d 484 (1965). … See Noble v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 485, 489 , 964 P2d 990 (1998). The board initially issued a policy statement, which had the effect of a rule. See Burke v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Robles v. SAIF Corp. (In re Robles)

    291 Or. App. 458 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2018

    SAIF , 362 Or. 38 , 403 P.3d 776 (2017), affirming the board's order with a citation to Brown v. SAIF , 361 Or. 241 , 391 P.3d 773 (2017). Robles v. SAIF , 289 Or. App. 441 , 407 P.3d 981 (2017). … In our original per curiam opinion citing Brown , we overlooked the fact that the second issue is not resolved by Brown .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.