Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.81s
Central School District 13J v. State Board of Education
91 Or. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1988
Jackson v. Dept. of Rev., 298 Or 633 , 695 P2d 923 (1985); Central School (Beaman I) v. Marion District, supra. … The Fuller remonstrance was premature because it preceded the final order of the Polk County District Boundary Board. As we noted in Central School (Beaman I) v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSevery v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
224 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 2008
App. 176 Donald SEVERY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A132525. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted October 30, 2008. Decided November 26, 2008. … Norris v. Board of Parole, 331 Or. 194 , 13 P.3d 104 (2000), cert. den., 534 U.S. 1028 , 122 S.Ct. 562 , 151 L.Ed.2d 437 (2001); Wilson v. Board of Parole, 222 Or. App. 224 , 193 P.3d 32 (2008).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCenter for Tribal Water Advocacy v. Board of Commissioners
222 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 3, 2008
Cited 1 timesPublished259 Or. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2013
TVKO v. Howland, 335 Or 527, 534 , 73 P3d 905 (2003); Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). … Board of Education, 347 US 483 , 74 S Ct 686 , 98 L Ed 873 (1954). That is not the law. See Cooper v. Aaron, 358 US 1, 18 , 78 S Ct 1401 , 3 L Ed 2d 5 (1958) (decision in Brown binds nonparties such as Ohio officials).
Cited 12 timesPublishedGordon v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
207 Or. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2006
App. 435 GORDON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. OREGON COURT OF APPEALS. August 23, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.
Reversed by Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision, 343 Or. 618 (2007)Cited 2 timesPublishedWes Linn Land Co. v. Board of County Commissioneers
36 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1978
We agree with petitioners that the Board’s findings are inadequate. The Board’s action on a subdivision application is quasi-judicial in nature, Bienz v. … This case must be remanded to the Board for an order consistent with this opinion. Reversed and remanded. 1 The rule of Marracci v. City of Scappoose, 26 Or App 131 , 552 P2d 552 , rev den (1976), and Dickinson v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSexton v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
245 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 2011
App. 165 SEXTON v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. A144971. Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 17, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDamascus Community Church v. Clackamas County Board of Commissioners
32 Or. App. 3 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 1978
In Bienz *9 v. … We stated in Saxon v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLarsen v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
243 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 2011
App. 389 LARSEN v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A143467 Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 8, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoslund v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
234 Or. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 2010
App. 365 BOSLUND v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A138583 Court of Appeals of Oregon. March 17, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHendricks v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
242 Or. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 2011
App. 518 HENDRICKS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A141758 Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 20, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMiller v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
95 P.3d 756 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 2004
95 P.3d 756 (2004) 194 Or.App. 327 MILLER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION Court of Appeals of Oregon. July 21, 2004. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHalladay v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
229 Or. App. 45 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2009
See Fleming v. Board of Parole, 225 Or App 578, 599 , 202 P3d 209 (2009) (describing *48 parole eligibility of a person convicted of aggravated murder after 20 years under ORS 163.105(3) (1985)). … AFSCME Local 2623 v. Dept. of Corrections, 315 Or 74, 79 , 843 P2d 409 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdwards v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
239 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2010
App. 629 EDWARDS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A139975 Court of Appeals of Oregon. December 22, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDickhous v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
239 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2010
App. 629 DICKHOUS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A140002 Court of Appeals of Oregon. December 22, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedParsons v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
239 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 15, 2010
App. 629 PARSONS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A141714 Court of Appeals of Oregon. December 15, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSmith v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
238 Or. App. 758 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 2010
App. 758 SMITH v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. A135158 Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 17, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKeith Brown Lumber Yard v. B & L Electric, Inc.
182 Or. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2002
Illingworth v. Bushong, 297 Or 675, 694 , 688 P2d 379 (1984); T. M. Peet Enterprises, Inc. v. Plaia, 131 Or App 153, 155 , 883 P2d 1329 (1994). … Corp. v. Leonard et al., 192 Or 639, 668-69 , 236 P2d 926 (1951) (quoting Restatement of the Law, Contracts, § 387); Block v. Love, 136 Or 685, 692 , 1 P2d 588 (1931) (same) (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedContreras v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
238 Or. App. 342 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 20, 2010
App. 342 CONTRERAS v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. A140822 Court of Appeals of Oregon. October 20, 2010. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRickman v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
153 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 1998
An order from the Oregon Board of Parole is not final and appealable until a petitioner seeks and the Board denies administrative review. ORS 144.335(1); Denham v. … Petitioner argues that dictum from Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 215 n 1, 924 P2d 314 (1996), and the result in Kessler v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna