Case law

Cunningham v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

155 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1998

At a 1996 hearing, the board upheld the judicially imposed minimum sentence and denied parole. … established by the board under its rules.”

Mooney v. Legacy Health

349 Or. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2026

cervical condition involving a spinal fusion and Brown-Sequard Syndrome. … C6-7, effective November 6, 2019.” 38 Mooney v.

Brune v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

44 Or. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1980

Minsinger et al v. U. S. Nat. Bank et al, 228 Or 218 , 364 P2d 615 (1961). … Proponents of the will in Price relied on Minsinger v.

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

168 Or. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 2000

Petitioner argues that the result of the rule is that no Board order is truly final. … determination of the issues before the Board.

Frey v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

151 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1997

The Board responds that the order is moot and therefore not justiciable, because on June 10, 1996, petitioner completed the sanction imposed. See Barcik v. … See State v. Noble, 307 Or 506 , 770 P2d 57 (1989) (where Board of Parole overrode minimum sentence, appeal challenging propriety of minimum sentence was moot); State v.

Price v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

73 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 1985

Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999, 1003 , 569 P2d 49 (1977). … Mazama Plywood Co. v. Beattie, 62 Or App 355 , 661 P2d 109 (1983).

Lee v. Lee

5 Or. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1971

Crawford v. Crane et ux, Hughes, 204 Or 60 , supra, involved an appeal from a summary judgment pursuant to ORS 9.370 (2). … Garner v. Garner, 182 Or 549, 562-63 , 189 P2d 397 (1948). Taylor v.

Haynes v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

271 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 2015

PER CURIAM Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 255-062-0021(2)(c)(C), part of a rule of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that governs requests for interim hearings when the board … See AFSCME Local 2623 v.

D & M Products, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board

30 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1977

Pursuant to its continuing jurisdiction, the Board is authorized to reconsider claims which it initially determined were noncompensable, Fields v. … Neeley v. Compensation Dept., 246 Or 522, 524-525 , 426 P2d 460 (1967); Marbet v.

Barnes v. Cache Valley Electric

339 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2025

The board did not apply an incorrect legal standard or err in upholding employer’s denial of the spon- dylosis. Cf. Pedro v. SAIF, 313 Or App 34, 495 P3d 183 (2021) 376 Barnes v. … Brown, 361 Or at 251.

Board of Commissioners v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

29 Or. App. 909 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1977

This is an appeal by the Board of Commissioners of Coos Comity (County) from an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC).

Nichelson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

144 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1996

Jancsek v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

162 Or. App. 96 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1999

the Board to increase his sentence by more than one standard variation, or 36 months. … Because the Board’s size changed after the rule’s repeal in 1988, there was no opportunity or reason to change those precise numbers in the rale. The Board could not amend a repealed rule.

Todd v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

161 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 1999

The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) anticipated a good-time release date of March 3,1997. … The state contends that, as we recognized in Ventris v.

Barnes v. Cache Valley Electric

339 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2025

The board did not apply an incorrect legal standard or err in upholding employer’s denial of the spon- dylosis. Cf. Pedro v. SAIF, 313 Or App 34, 495 P3d 183 (2021) 376 Barnes v. … Brown, 361 Or at 251.

Wilson v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

222 Or. App. 224 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 2008

For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the disposition in Norris v. Board of Parole, 331 Or 194 , 13 P3d 104 (2000), cert den, 534 US 1028 (2001), is conclusive. Accordingly, we affirm. … In Norris, the court stated that, as of the date that the board concluded that the petitioner was capable of rehabilitation, “the Board must change the first of petitioner’s life sentences to life with the possibility of

Davidson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

140 Or. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 1996

“Thus, the board may terminate the sentence by discharging petitioner from parole. … See PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 611 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993); Massee and Massee, 138 Or App 589, 596 , 911 P2d 320 (1996).

Associated Reforestation Contractors, Inc. v. State Workers' Compensation Board

59 Or. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

Gates v. McClure, 284 Or 685 , 588 P2d 32 (1978). … Kuhns et ux v. State Tax Com., 223 Or 547, 554 , 355 P2d 249 (1960).

Central School District 13J v. Marion District Boundary Board

88 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1987

Marion Board’s order is not subject to review by either the State Board of Education or this court until Polk Board approves it. See Steamboaters v. … We note, however, that our opinion in Kumley v. Polk Co. Dist.

SAIF Corp. v. Curtis

107 Or. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

In 1980, when our review of workers’ compensation cases was de novo, the Supreme Court said, in Brown v. … Court’s comment in Brown.