Case law

Glasser v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

At the time of petitioner’s crime, OAR 255-40-025 permitted the Board to reduce a prison term by up to 20 percent. Jeldness v. … He argues that that is apparent from the fact that the Board did not alter the amount of his sentence reduction on rehearing. In Rise v.

Griffin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

201 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2005

Wilkinson v. Austin, _ US _, 125 S Ct 2384 , 162 L Ed 2d 174 (2005); Davis v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 200 Or App 366 , 114 P3d 1138 (2005). As we noted in Hamel v. … Erbs v.

Boyd v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON SHANE ALLEN BOYD, Petitioner, v. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Burton v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

31 Or. App. 1045 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 1977

Petitioner’s license to practice dentistry was suspended for six months upon a determination by the Board of Dental Examiners that he had referred a patient to a dental laboratory for the fitting of a denture, in other words … Regarding sanction, see, Mary’s Fine Food, Inc. v. OLCC, 30 Or App 435 , 567 P2d 146 rev pending (1977). There being no other challenges to the order, it is affirmed. Affirmed.

Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners

34 Or. App. 607 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 1978

Palm Gardens, Inc. v. … We pointed out in Bay River v. Envir.

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

126 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1994

However, we considered and rejected the same argument in our opinion on reconsideration in Jeldness v. … The Board did not err in doing so. The Board’s order granting petitioner a six-month reduction in his prison term was proper. Affirmed. In Smith v.

South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of Commissioners

28 Or. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 1977

Evidently, the questions could be responded to or ignored as the board members pleased. … However, at the least the plaintiffs were given an opportunity to draw the board’s attention to their objections * * 27 Or App at 663-64. They are correct.

Coldiron v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR CURRY CTY.

39 Or. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1979

Fritz v. OSP, 30 Or App 1117 , 569 P2d 654 , (1977); Withrow v. Larkin, 421 US 35 , 95 S Ct 1456 , 43 L Ed 2d 712 (1975); Hortonville Dist. v. Hortonville Ed. … Hortonville Dist. v. Hortonville Ed. Assn., supra; Gregg v.

Maimon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

138 Or. App. 328 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1995

However, in Eggsman v. Board of Parole, 60 Or App 381 , 653 P2d 1277 (1982), we held that the Board had such authority. … Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993), rev den 318 Or 325 (1994).

Scenic Sites, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

27 Or. App. 831 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1976

On May 13, 1975, the board accepted the commission’s recommendations with slight modifications. 2 The circuit court upheld the essence of the board’s order, 3 and this appeal followed. … Duddles v. City Council of West Linn, 21 Or App 310, 328 , 535 P2d 583 , Sup Ct review denied (1975). We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Remanded with directions.

Boyd v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON SHANE ALLEN BOYD, Petitioner, v. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Forelaws on Board v. Energy Facility Siting Council

84 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1987

This court, however, must ‘discern and declare the intent of the legislature’ [citing Whipple v. Howser, 291 Or 475, 479 , 632 P2d 782 (1981)].” … See, e.g., Gregg v. Racing Commission, 38 Or App 19, 24-25 , 588 P2d 1290 , rev den 286 Or 637 (1979).

Boxberger v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

123 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1993

See Hayes v. Board of Parole, 115 Or App 36 , 836 P2d 767 (1992). In addition, the victims were not simply under 12 years of age, they were substantially younger than 12. As we explained in Jarvis v. … Jarvis v. State Board of Parole, supra, 96 Or App at 325 . The Board did that. Affirmed.

Ha v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

282 Or. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2016

The board agreed with that recommendation and revoked petitioner’s parole in May 2012. Petitioner sought judicial review of the board’s order revoking his parole; we affirmed *229 that order without opinion. Ha v. … Petitioner’s argument does not take into account either OAR 255-75-096, on which the board expressly relied, or our decision in State ex rel Gonzalez v.

Aplanalp v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Board of Optometry

21 Or. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1975

There are numerous Oregon cases which are contrary in principle to the Board’s position on this issue, e.g., McKee v. Foster, 219 Or 322 , 327 P2d 585 (1959), Mult. Co. Fair Assn. v. … Moore v. West Lawn Mem’l Park, 266 Or 244 , 512 P2d 1344 (1973).

J. L. Ward Co. v. Landscape Contractors Board

141 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

Corp. v. Koitzsch, 135 Or App 524, 526 , 899 P2d 724 (1995). … In reviewing the Board’s interpretation of the statute, we examine the text of the statute, in context, and, if necessary, legislative history and other aids to construction. PGE v.

Martin v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

77 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 1986

He relies on Brown v. Jeld Wen, Inc., 52 Or App 191 , 627 P2d 1291 (1981). … As we said in Alvarez v. GAB Business Services, 72 Or App 524, 527 , 696 P2d 1131 (1985): “The Board correctly refused to exercise hindsight in determining whether the claim was prematurely closed.

Cunningham v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

155 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1998

At a 1996 hearing, the board upheld the judicially imposed minimum sentence and denied parole. … established by the board under its rules.”

Mooney v. Legacy Health

349 Or. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2026

cervical condition involving a spinal fusion and Brown-Sequard Syndrome. … C6-7, effective November 6, 2019.” 38 Mooney v.

Brune v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education

44 Or. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1980

Minsinger et al v. U. S. Nat. Bank et al, 228 Or 218 , 364 P2d 615 (1961). … Proponents of the will in Price relied on Minsinger v.