Case law

Moore v. Brown

19 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1974

See, Rea v. Rea, 195 Or 252 , 245 P2d 884 , 35 ALR2d 612 (1952); Wood v. School District No. 13 et al., 107 Or 280 , 214 P 589 (1923); Wyatt v. Wyatt, 31 Or 531 , 49 P 855 (1897); Shiffer v. … Brown et ux v. Hassenstab et ux, 212 Or 246 , 319 P2d 929 (1957).

State v. Brown

225 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2009

In State v. Stubbs, 193 Or App 595, 604 , 91 P3d 774 (2004), we explained that ORS 138.050(1) “embodies a jurisdictional limitation on appeal.” … See, e.g., State v. Zell, 89 Or App 394 , 749 P2d 1196 (1988) (reaching same result under earlier version of ORS 138.050). Appeal dismissed. 1 Defendant received a deferred sentence pursuant to the plea agreement.

State v. Brown

143 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1996

State v. … Thus, in State v.

State v. Brown

119 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1993

OAR253-12-020(2)(d); State v. Holliday, 110 Or App 426 , 824 P2d 1148 , rev den 313 Or 211 (1992). Defendant also argues that the court erred in imposing 18 months probation on each consecutive sentence. … State v. Dummitt, 115 Or App 487 , 839 P2d 246 (1992). The state argues that all the sentences should be remanded for resentencing and invites us to overrule State v.

Brown v. SAIF Corp.

262 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 2014

See, e.g., Schuler v. … .”); SAIF v.

State v. Brown

219 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 2008

State v. Marshall, 219 Or App 511 , 183 P3d 241 (2008).

State v. Brown

96 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989

State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983). … See Higgins v. Redding, 34 Or App 1029, 1034 , 580 P2d 580 , rev den 284 Or 80a (1978).

State v. Brown

100 Or. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1990

State v. Magee, supra, 304 Or at 266 . The court later confirmed that State v. Magee, supra, did not eliminate the requirement of “custody.” The opinion in State v. … The facts in State v. Vu, supra, and State v. Magee, supra, are also instructive.

State v. Brown

249 Or. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 11, 2012

App. 334 STATE v. BROWN. A146353 Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 11, 2012. Affirmed without opinion.

State v. Brown

49 Or. App. 75 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1980

The facts leading to the discovery of the cocaine are not materially different from those that we held supported a lawful search and seizure in State v. Patton, 47 Or App 169 , 613 P2d 1102 (1980).

Knepper v. Brown

213 Or. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2007

Believing that Brown was board certified as a plastic surgeon, Knepper added Brown’s name to her list of possible surgeons. … See, e.g.,In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 595 , 956 P2d 188 (1998); Riley Hill General Contractor v. Tandy Corp., 303 Or 390, 405 , 737 P2d 595 (1987); Conzelmann v. N. W. P. & D. Prod.

State v. Brown

316 Or. App. 808 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2022

State v. Hedgpeth, 365 Or 724, 730, 452 P3d 948 (2019); State v. … See State v.

State v. Brown

246 Or. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 2, 2011

App. 576 STATE v. BROWN. A143444 Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 2, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

State v. Brown

132 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1995

State v. Orsi/Gauthier, 108 Or App 176, 180 , 813 P2d 82 (1991); see also State v. Drake, 113 Or App 16 , 832 P2d 44 (1992). … The dissent then *448 asserts that even if defendant “did not make the particular argument to the trial court that he makes here, [State v.

Brown v. CARONAN

245 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 2011

App. 165 BROWN v. CARONAN. No. A143172. Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 10, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Brown v. Gatti

240 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 2011

Brown v. Gatti, 195 Or App 695, 698-99 , 99 P3d 299 (2004) (Brown I). … Brown v. Gatti, 341 Or 452, 457 , 145 P3d 130 (2006) (Brown II).

State v. Brown

9 Or. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1972

Miranda v. Arizona, supra, requires that the warning be given where pretrial statements offered against a defendant result from custodial interrogation by the police. … Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485 , 443 P2d 621 (1968). Affirmed.

State v. Brown

241 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011

On appeal, defendant contends that, under State v. … Instead, relying primarily on our decision in State v.

State v. Brown

82 Or. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

State v. Hunter, 58 Or App 99, 110 , 647 P2d 943 (1982), rev den 294 Or 391 (1983). ORS 161.735 requires the court to consider the presentence report and the evidence in the case, as well as the psychiatric report. … See State v. McCormick, 80 Or App 191 , 721 P2d 471 , rev den 302 Or 86 (1986). Judgments modified by vacating sentences for the underlying felonies; affirmed as modified.

State v. Brown

243 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 2011

App. 389 STATE v. BROWN. A144408 Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 8, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.