Case law

Coalition for Equitable School Funding, Inc. v. State

311 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1991

Longhurst, Her Guardian Ad Litem; Sasha Marie Brown, a Minor, by Rebecca L. Brown, Her Guardian Ad Litem; Tristan W. Proett, a Minor, by Stan W. … Brown; Stan W. Proett; and William Farmer On Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. STATE of Oregon, John A.

Miller v. Gold Beach Packing Co.

131 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1929

The New York Court of Appeals in Brownell v. Board of Education, 239 N. Y. 369 ( 146 N. E. 630 , 37 A. L. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent.

Richter v. Ritchie

181 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1947

The contention is made by counsel for respondent that claimant is indebted to the estate for board, that when she started making these improvements and payments for taxes she quit paying board. … W. 101 ; Collar v. Collar, 86 Mich. 507, 513 , 49 N. W. 551 , 13 L. R. A. 621, 624; Bork v. Martin, 132 N. Y. 280 , 30 N. E. 584 , 28 Am. St. Rep. 570 ; Logan v. Brown, 20 Okla. 334 , 95 P. 441 , 20 L. R.

Coos Bay Railroad v. Siglin

34 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1898

Upon the first proposition there can be no question but that the court is sustained by the record; and upon the second it is sustained by the case of State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ). … See, also, Bleiler v. Moore, 88 Wis. 438 ( 60 N. W. 792 ); Shahan v. Smith, 38 Kan. 474 ( 16 Pac. 749 ); Witkowski v. Hill, 17 Colo. 372 ( 30 Pac. 55 ).

Robertson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

114 Or. 394 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1925

BROWN, J. — That the claimant suffered an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment is not disputed. … The following illustrative cases are found in 1 Workmen’s Compensation Law, Schneider, at Section 232: In the case of Brown v. Watson, 7 B. W. C.

Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.

359 Or. 610 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2016

A properly graded No. 2 board should have been able to hold the weight that Kevin placed on the board. … Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 405, 848 P2d 1194 (1993); see also Brown v.

State v. Bliss

363 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2018

For instance, in State v. … Similarly, in State v.

Anderson v. Alexander

191 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1951

In Turner v. … Brown et al. v. State Personnel Board et al., 43 Cal. App. 2d 70 , 110 P. 2d 497 .

State v. Millis

61 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1912

The earliest case on this point in the case of State v. Chadwick and Brown, 10 Or. 423 . … In People v.

Hartman v. Oregon Elec. Ry. Co.

77 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1915

Co., 56 Or. 262, 268 ( 108 Pac. 211 ); Doyle v. Southern Pac. Co., 56 Or. 495, 516 ( 108 Pac. 201 ); Smith v. Southern Pac. Co., 58 Or. 22, 31 ( 113 Pac. 41 , Ann. Cas. 1913A, 434); Graves v. Portland etc. P. … Cas. 1915B, 500, 134 Pac. 1 ); Gynther v. Brown & McCabe, 67 Or. 310, 318 ( 134 Pac. 1186 ).

Witt v. Kulongoski

319 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1994

See Reed v. Roberts, 304 Or 649, 655, 657 , 748 P2d 542 (1988) (“the unambiguous language of the measure suggests a dual purpose,” modifying summary to include two effects); see also Kenagy v. … Baker v. Keisling, 312 Or 385, 392 , 822 P2d 1162 (1991).

Linebaugh v. Portland Mortgage Co.

116 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1925

v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., .concur.

Cottage Grove Lumber Co. v. Lillegren

227 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1961

Lovell v. Potts, 112 Or 538, 558 , 207 P 1006 , 226 P 1111 (1924); Lumbermen’s Nat. Bank v. Campbell, 61 Or 123, 126 , 121 P 427 (1912); Hoffman v. … See Hough v. Porter, 51 Or 318, 375 , 95 P 732 , 98 P 1083 (1909); Knighton v. Chamberlin, 84 Or 153, 159 , 164 P 703 ; and Huson v. Portland & Southeastern Ry.

Keystone Milling Co. v. Equity Mining Co.

47 Or. 628 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1906

by Browne, which was called the “Keystone Fraction.” … Starr, one of the locators, pointed out to him what purported to be the boundary common to the Keystone and to the Wide West claims, calling his attention to a stump near an open cut to which, a board was nailed, having thereon

State Ex Rel. Willamette National Lumber Co. v. Circuit Court

187 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1949

Milliken, 149 Ky. 516 , 149 S.W. 875 ; Alabama Clay Products Co. v. City of Birmingham, 226 Ala. 631 , 148 So. 328 ; Herdman Motor Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 119 N. J. L. 164, 194 A. 870 . … There was no suggestion that the corporation maintained a principal or any place of business any *613 where except in Brown County, so the case is not of much help here. Another case cited "by respondents is Partch v.

State v. Burroughs

130 Or. 480 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1929

*482 BROWN, J. The defendant was accused of practicing medicine without a license. The charging part of the indictment reads: “The said Albert 0. Burroughs, on the first day of March, A. … There was no error in this ruling: State v. Humphrey, 63 Or. 540 ( 128 Pac. 824 ), and local citations there noted; State v. Laundy, 103 Or. 443 ( 204 Pac. 958 , 206 Pac. 290 ); State v.

Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace, Health, & Hospital Services v. Russell

318 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1994

The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed. Aetna and Russell sought judicial review in the Court of Appeals. … Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). As a general proposition, a third party’s right to enforce a contractual promise in its favor depends on the intention of the parties to the contract.

Forman v. Clatsop County

297 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1984

Forman, Petitioners On Review, v. CLATSOP COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Oregon; Sports Acres, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; Milton O. Brown and Raymond Kittleson, Respondents On Review. … Decision turned on whether a board's action was a "rule." The Court of Appeals held that it was not and dismissed the petition for judicial review. Graziano v. City Council of Canby, 35 Or.

Chapman v. First Nat. Bank

72 Or. 492 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1914

The money being on deposit at the time •of its appropriation by the president, the board of directors, as the “mind” of the corporation, having a general superintendency over and the management of the business affairs and … If the essential facts are either suppressed or unknown, the ratification is treated as invalid, because founded in mistake or fraud: Valley Bank of Phoenix v. Brown, 9 Ariz. 311 ( 83 Pac. 362 ); Owings v.

Pennoyer v. Wadhams

11 L.R.A. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1891

In Schmidt v. … C. 4 Iowa, 252 ; Attorney-General v. Chester, 1 Brown’s Ch. 389; 2 Perry on Trusts, §§ 730, 736; Vidal v. Girard, 2 How. 126 ; Johnson v. Mayne, 4 Iowa, 180 ; Cumming v. Trustees, 64 Ga. 105 .