Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
2.46s
202 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1954
See Ervast v. Sterling, 156 Or 432, 439 , 68 P2d 137 , and Oregon precedents therein cited. See, also, State v. Morrow, 158 Or 412 , 75 P2d 737 , 76 P2d 971 ." Birks v. … It reads as follows: "The court erred in not granting the request of defendants Royce and Brown to have the markings on a black board that was extensively used by a witness (and by following witnesses) put upon paper so as
Cited 2 timesPublished114 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1924
Morgan, Fliedner & Boyce, 66 Or. 9 ( 131 Pac. 314 , 134 Pac. 1037 ); Tamm v. Sauset, 67 Or. 292 ( 135 Pac. 868 , L. R. A. 1917D, 988); Woodard v. A. F. Coats Lumber Co., 97 Or. 302 ( 191 Pac. 668 ); McCauley v. … J., and Brown and Coshow, JJ., concur. Former opinion adhered to on rehearing April 7, 1925.
Cited 27 timesPublished310 Or. 134 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1990
The Board merely affirmed the referee’s order. However, both parties argued to the Board and the Court of Appeals whether the wage-rate error was covered by claim preclusion rules. Drews v. … Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 291 Or 77, 84 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981); see also Waterway Terminals v. P.S.
Cited 202 timesPublished24 Or. 16 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1893
Brown, 33 Ohio St. 547 ; Antomarchi’s Exr. v. Russell, 63 Ala. 359 ( 35 Am. Rep. 40 ); Hoffman v. Kuhn, 51 Miss. 746 ( 34 Am. Rep. 491 ); Glenn v. Davis, 35 Md. 219 ( 6 Am. Rep. 389 ). … In Hoffman v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedHaddock Construction Co. v. Wilber
178 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 1946
In Beebe v. … , wrongful abstraction, or misapplication on the part of Brown in his capacity as manager.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWashington-Oregon Investment Co. v. Jackson County
170 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1942
Great Northern Railway Company v. Weeks, 297 U. S. 135 , 80 L. E. 532, 56 S. Ct. 426 , and Skouras Theatres Corporation v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N. J. … Louis Railway Co. v. Browning, 310 U. S. 362 , 84 L. E. 1254, 60 S. Ct. 968 , wherein the court observed: . . But even assuming that there was an over-assessment, constitutional invalidity would not follow.
Cited 1 timesPublished7 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879
Badollet, 1 Blackf. 416 ; Gilmore v. Brown, 1 Mason, 191 ; Williams v. Roberts, 5 Ohio, 35; 4 Kent. Com. 154; Houck on Liens, sec. 202.) … (Kinney v. Thomas, 28 Ill. 505 ; Gardner v. Hall, 29 Ill. 277 ; Gorman *232 v. Sagner, 22 Mo. 137 ; Borrows v. Baughman, 9 Mich. 213 ; Phillips on Liens, sec. 280, and cases there cited.)
Cited 17 timesPublished41 Or. 407 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1902
.) § 759; Browne, Stat. Frauds, § 448b. … testimony is to the effect that neither the resignation nor resolution had anything whatever to do with the contract between the plaintiff and himself, but the resignation was brought about by the dissatisfaction of the board
Cited 6 timesPublished125 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1928
BROWN, J. … L., relating to boards of commissioners of ports and the changing of boundaries and names of such ports.
Cited 9 timesPublished349 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 2010
Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and subsequent cases. See State v. Lyons, 324 Or 256, 260 , 924 P2d 802 (1996) (conducting pretrial hearing on admissibility of scientific evidence in light of Brown); State v. … Peeples v.
Cited 26 timesPublished109 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1923
Brown, 79 N. Y. 390 ; King v. Townshend, 65 Hun, 567 ( 20 N. Y. Supp. 602 ); same case, 141 N. Y. 358 ( 36 N. E. 513 .)” Hoover v. King, 43 Or. 281 (72 Pan. 880, 99 Am. St. Rep. 754 , 65 L. R. A. 790). … Based upon this application and the recommendation of an official of the board, the water right was transferred by the State Water Board.
Cited 18 timesPublishedPendleton School District 16R v. State
345 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 2009
Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citations omitted). … Roach v. The Board of President and Directors of the St. Louis Public Schools, 77 Mo 484, 485-88 (1883) (rejecting argument that common schools may lawfully teach only “the rudiments of an English education”).
Cited 24 timesPublishedIn re Complaint as to the Conduct of McMenamin
319 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1994
Brown sought punitive damages, making the attitude of the defendant toward claims of clergy sexual abuse relevant. See Honeywell v. … Brown case.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKappa Gamma Rho v. Marion County
130 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1929
In the case of Beta Theta Pi v. Board of Commrs., above, the court’s decision is based upon a territorial statute reading as follows: “Fifth. … Brown, J., absent.
Cited 28 timesPublishedPortland Building Co. v. State Bank
110 Or. 61 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1924
See, also, Board of Commrs. v. Strawn, 157 Fed. 49 (15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100, 84 C. C. A. 553 ); National Bank v. Insurance Co., 104 U. S. 54 ( 26 L. Ed. 658 , see also, Rose’s U. S. Notes); Smith v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
331 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2000
In State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), this court considered whether polygraph evidence was *300 admissible. … State v.
Cited 47 timesPublishedMiller v. Gold Beach Packing Co.
131 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1929
The New York Court of Appeals in Brownell v. Board of Education, 239 N. Y. 369 ( 146 N. E. 630 , 37 A. L. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent.
Cited 12 timesPublished88 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1918
Brown, the Attorney General, and to Mr. John O. … Brown, clerk of the State Land Board.
Cited 18 timesPublished135 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1931
“A lessor is not obligated to keep leased premises in repair in the absence of an express contract to do so”: Kahn v. Love, 3 Or. 206 ; Fleischner v. Investment Co., 25 Or. 119 ( 35 P. 174 ); De Wolfe v. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.
Cited 10 timesPublished181 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1947
The contention is made by counsel for respondent that claimant is indebted to the estate for board, that when she started making these improvements and payments for taxes she quit paying board. … W. 101 ; Collar v. Collar, 86 Mich. 507, 513 , 49 N. W. 551 , 13 L. R. A. 621, 624; Bork v. Martin, 132 N. Y. 280 , 30 N. E. 584 , 28 Am. St. Rep. 570 ; Logan v. Brown, 20 Okla. 334 , 95 P. 441 , 20 L. R.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna