Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.75s

  • Wheeler v. McNett

    281 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1978

    See Davis v. Brown, 280 Or 561 , 571 P2d 912 (1977). In that case, however, it was noted by this court (at 565) that the parties had "agreed on terms that allow specific enforcement of that stipulated contract.” … Wagner v. Rainier Mfg. Co., 230 Or 531, 539-40 , 371 P2d 74 (1962), and Western Bank v. Morrill, 245 Or 47, 59 , 420 P2d 119 (1966). See also Corbin on Contracts 97-99, § 30 (1963).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barcik v. Kubiaczyk

    321 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1995

    Oregon State Police Assn. v. State of Oregon, 308 Or 531, 538 , 783 P2d 7 (1989), cert den 498 US 810 (1990). If, however, plaintiffs’ state law claims are moot, they may not be addressed. See Brown v. … Brown, 293 Or at 449 (citations omitted). A. Senior Plaintiffs For Senior plaintiffs, except Barcik (whose unique situation is discussed separately below), this case is analogous to Kay v. David Douglas Sch. Dist.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Stelljes v. State Bd. of Parole

    307 Or. 365 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1989

    We agree with the Board. Costs and attorney fees are not recoverable absent a statute or contractual provision authorizing the award. Compton v. Weyerhaeuser, 302 Or 366, 367 , 730 P2d 540 (1986); Lewis v. … See Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Emp. Div., 302 Or 139, 142, 727 P2d 117 (1986). However, the Board is specifically exempted from the provisions of ORS 183.497.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Ford Industries, Inc.

    266 Or. 479 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1973

    In Baker v. … v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shannon v. Gladden

    245 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1966

    ” Petitioner alleges in his petition that he went before a disciplinary board and was questioned about sawing some bars, which petitioner denies he did, and thereafter he was taken from isolation to the other side of the … This was the subject of People ex rel Brown v. Johnston, 9 NY2d 482 , 215 NY Supp2d 44, 174 NE2d 725 (1961).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Knappton Towboat Co. v. Chambers

    202 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1954

    Co. v. Brown, 32 F Supp 784, 792 , the court said: “* * * Furthermore, we are convinced that there is no cut and dried formula that the Tax Commission is obliged to follow, nor is there any percentage it must use. … Ott v. Mississippi Barge Line, 336 US 169 , 69 S Ct. 432, 93 L Ed 585 ; Nashville C. & St. L. Ry. v. Browning, 310 US 362 , 60 S Ct 968 , 84 L Ed 1254 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Lauderback v. Multnomah County

    111 Or. 681 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1924

    BROWN, J. The term “County Court,” as used in the road law, includes the “board of county commissioners” of Multnomah County: Section 1, Chap. 295, Laws 1917 (§ 4536, Or. L.). … Proof of Notice; Board of Viewers.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Arvidson v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

    366 Or. 693 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2020

    Co. v. … Shearer’s Foods v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bunnell v. Parelius

    166 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1941

    In Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board , *Page 193 305 U.S. 197 , 83 L.ed. 126 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , Mr. … In National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia Enameling Stamping Co. , 306 U.S. 292 , 83 L.ed. 660 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , Mr.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Trebesch v. Employment Division

    300 Or. 264 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1985

    In Megdal v. … See Brown v. Employment Division, Appeals Board Decision 83-AB-728; Hoffman v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Updegraff

    140 Or. 401 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1932

    .” *405 In the light of Marin v. … J., Brown and Rossman, JJ., concur. Petition for rehearing denied September 14, 1932.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Talbot v. Garretson

    31 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1897

    By one class of cases — of which Board of Supervisors v. … Y. 78 ; Hatch v. Central Bank, 78 N. Y. 487 ; Freeman v. Grant, 132 N. Y. 22 ( 30 N. E. 247 ). In Brown v. Leigh, 49 N.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • In re Weidner

    320 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1994

    In Ellis v. … In Stephan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sprague v. Astoria

    100 Or. 298 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1921

    W. 938 ); Brown v. Owosso, 126 Mich. 91 ( 85 N. W. 256 ); Ridgeway v. Escanaba, 154 Mich. 68 ( 117 N. W. 550 ); Comery v. White, 40 R. I. 21 ( 99 Atl. 756, 760 ); Weinstein v. New York, 141 N. … In the case of Titus v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. McCarthy

    369 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2021

    State v. … State v. Kock In Brown, the police stopped the defendant’s car when the defendant was driving it.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Harney Valley Irrigation District v. Weittenhiller

    101 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1921

    The subject was treated by this court, in State v. McElrath, 49 Or. 294 ( 89 Pac. 803 ). … Justice Brown took no part in the consideration of this case.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rostad v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.

    101 Or. 569 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1921

    And it was also said that the plaintiff was “boarding one of said street-cars.” … McBride, Brown and Harris, JJ., concur.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

    262 Or. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1972

    The Board of Governors, nine voting, found the accused guilty as charged in seven of the causes of complaint. … The Board of Governors recommended that Neil Brown be suspended b}r the Supreme Court from the practice of law in the State of Oregon for a period of two years. We agree that this is the most appropriate discipline.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. Edwards

    361 Or. 761 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 10, 2017

    Audio Recording, Senate Education and General Government Committee, SB 822, April 10, 2007 at 47:52 (statement of Paula Brown). … The employer sought judicial review of the board’s decision and asserted, for the first time, that the board lacked jurisdiction to hear med- ical services claims.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • In re No.

    363 Or. 42 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 2018

    A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board conducted a hearing and determined that respondent had committed all of the charged violations. … The Brown Matter Respondent represented Brown and negotiated a settlement in which the opposing party agreed to pay Brown $6,000.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.