Case law

State v. Douglas

310 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1990

State v. Brown, supra, 310 Or at 374 . … at board expense.

State v. Keller

315 Or. 273 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1993

Middleton, 294 Or 427 , 657 P2d 1215 (1983),] that was permitted, but that Middleton was decided before [State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984)]. “And the Milbradt court says [that] in State v. … State v. Brown, 299 Or 143, 152-53 , 699 P2d 1122 (1985) (party who makes later mention of subject for an independent reason cannot claim error in respect to original offer of such evidence).

Wiley v. Whitney

76 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1915

prejudicial in a suit in equity, .where the issues are tried by the court, as in an action at law, where the disputed questions to which the par *99 ties have narrowed their several averments'are to he tried by a jury: Brown … v.

Reid v. Multnomah County

100 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1921

BROWN, J. 1, 2. When the pertinent facts in this case are analyzed in the light of the statute relating to assessment and taxation, all intricate questions disappear. … App. 59 ( 116 Pac. 296 ); in Miller v. Kraus (Cal. App.), 155 Pac. 834 ; in Wellsville Oil Co. v. Miller, 44 Okl. 493 ( 145 Pac. 344 ); in Conners v. Conners Bros. Co., 110 Me. 428 ( 86 Atl. 843 ); Harton v.

Smith Bros. v. Wheeler & Simmons

7 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

(Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107.) In New York the rule is directly the reverse of this. In a recent case, Church, C. … (Hayden v. Dements, 53 N. Y. 426 ; Dunton v. McAndrew, 44 N. Y. 72 .) The ruling in Pennsylvania is the same.

In Re Brown

326 Or. 582 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1998

Brown, 255 Or 628, 634-35 , 469 P2d 763 (1970). … ABA Standards 9.22(a) and (g); Brown.

Clark & Wilson Lumber Co. v. Weed

137 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1931

The distinction is recognized in Fisher v. Betts, 12 N. D. 197 ( 96 N. W. 132 ). In that case the levy was made by the state board of equaliza *191 tion. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Johnson v. SAIF

369 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 2022

v. … See Caren, 365 Or at 472 (citing Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 283, 391 P3d 773 (2017)). With that in mind, we turn to the statutes at issue in this case. A.

City of Pendleton v. Standerfer

297 Or. 725 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1984

We held in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist Ct, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), that a conviction for DUII obtained when a defendant was without the assistance of counsel and had not waived counsel was invalid. … With misdemeanor prosecutions, however, the federal right extends only to those cases in which actual imprisonment is imposed, Scott v. Illinois, supra. Article I, section 11 is not so limited. Brown v.

In re Althouse Creek

85 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1917

One of the ditches is known in the record as the Beach & Platter-Leonard ditch although it is sometimes called the ‘ ‘ Old Brown or Dunn ditch.” This ditch serves two water users: George W. Dunn and Mary Ellen Leonard. … The water board found that George W.

Gooch v. Rogers

193 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1951

Nye Schneider Fowler Co., 260 U.S. 35 , 67 L.Ed. 115 43 S.Ct. 55 ; Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Tucker, 230 U.S. 340 , 57 L.Ed. 1507 , 33 S.Ct. 961 ; Edwards & Browne Coal Co. v. … Prompted by the above considerations, we deem that the principle of law employed in Superior Laundry Co. v. Rose, Ex parte Young, Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Tucker, Edwards & Browne Coal Co. v.

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Robertson

129 Or. 663 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1929

This was done with the knowledge and consent of the board of directors of the school district. … Brown, J., absent.

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

250 Or. 37 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar has recommended that the license of the accused to practice law he suspended for a period of two years and thereafter until the accused … The record fully supports the recommendation of the Board of Governors. Kenneth E. Brown is suspended as a member of the bar of this state for a period of two years.

Scoggin v. Schloath

15 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1887

(Murphy v. Bank of Mobile, 16 Ala. 90 ; Patten v. Gracie, 68 Ala. 90 ; Houston v. Blackman, 66 Ala. 559 ; Galbreath v. Cook, 30 Ark. 417 ; Carmack v. Lovet, 44 Ark. 180 ; Glenn v. McNeal, 3 Md. Ch. 349 ; Ellinger v. … Elliott, 1 Dev. 76 ; Bank of the United States v. Brown, 2 Hill Eq. 426 ; Glenn v. McNeal, 3 Md. Ch. 349 ; Mayfield v. Kilgom, 21 Md. 240 ; Hindee’s Lessee v. Longworth, 11 Wheat. 199 .)

Poddar v. Department of Revenue

328 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1999

See State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 273 , *563 721 P2d 1357 (1986) (Article I, section 9, requires impartial approval of judicial officer before most searches); State v. … In resolving that claim, the Tax Court, quoting Lora v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, 74 FRD 565, 576 (ED New York 1977), observed that “[tjhe right of privacy is not absolute.

Rickert v. State Industrial Accident Commission

122 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1927

BROWN, J. … We refer to the case of West v.

Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.

349 Or. 348 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2010

board’s decision and remanded it for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Karjalainen v. … See SAIF v. Sprague, *365 346 Or 661, 674-75 , 217 P3d 644 (2009) (affirming board decision when there was substantial evidence in record supporting board’s factual findings).

Stowe v. Ryan

135 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1931

*374 BROWN, J. It appears from the order of discharge that Commissioner H. C. … Rotan v. Hasskarl, 21 Pa. Dist.

Klamath County v. Colonial Realty Co.

139 Or. 311 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1932

Under this state of the law the courts did not favor tax titles-: Noble v. … J., Brown and Belt JJ., concur.

Clatsop County ex rel. Hildebrand v. Feldschau

101 Or. 369 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1921

In Sample v. Hale, 34 Neb. 220 ( 51 N. W. 837 ), a state board was held authorized to require a contractor on a public building to contract to protect labor and material. … J., and Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.