Case law

Johnston v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 2018

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Greene

290 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1980

The Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found Greene innocent of all charges except one. … Brown v. Hilleary, 133 Or 26, 38 , 286 P 593 (1930). Greene should have advised the court that the money was being used to acquire an interest in real property owned by the conservator.

Jackson County v. Ulrich

118 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1926

The case of Multnomah County v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State Board of Higher Education v. Synod of Oregon of the United Presbyterian Church

243 Or. 352 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1966

ORS 351.190 grants to the Board of Higher Education the right of condemnation in accordance with the provisions of ORS 366.375 to 366.390. … Cottrell v. Prier, 191 Or 571, 575 , 231 P2d 788 ; Barnes v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 112 Or 41, 43 , 228 P 684 ; Graves v.

Re Petition of Reeder

110 Or. 484 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1924

BROWN, J. … Section 4544 provides for a board of county road viewers, and the succeeding three sections relate to their qualifications, the location of the road by viewers, and the procedure of that board.

Nicklin v. Betts Spring Co.

11 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1884

Parrish, 3 Mich., 211 ; Parsell v. Thayer, 39 Mich., 467 ; Hurd v. Brown, 37 Mich., 484 .) … St., 172; McClure v. Roman, 52 Pa. St., 460; Brown v. Kiefer, 71 N. Y., 610 ; 101 U. S. R., 626 ; Commercial Bank v. Cunningham, 35 Am. Dec., 325 .)

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boyer

295 Or. 624 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1983

Both the Trial Board and Disciplinary Review Board found the accused not to be a credible witness. We agree. A major part of the accused’s practice had been in real estate and contract law. … The Disciplinary Review Board endorsed that recommendation.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bauer

283 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1978

The Trial Board’s recommendation was: "Recommend That File Be Closed With No Action.” 2 The decision of the Disciplinary Review Board was as follows: "The Disciplinary Review Board, in the form of a panel consisting of [Kenneth … See In re Brown, 277 Or 121, 134 , 559 P2d 884 (1977).

State Ex Rel. Casey v. Casey

175 Or. 328 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1944

A. 735; Brown v. Brown, 222 Mass. 415 , 111 N. E. 42, 43 ; Bacigalupi v. Bacigalupi, 72 Cal. App. 654 , 238 P. 93 ; annotation, 137 A. L. R. 884. See also, in this connection, Brown v. Brown, 135 Mich. 141 , 97 N. … Brown, 135 Mich. 141 , 97 N. W. 396 .

Thomson v. Silsby

120 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1927

(Seal) “Edith Brown Silsby. … L., this recital is conclusive proof as between the parties of a performed contractual consideration: Sutherlin v. Bloomer, 50 Or. 398 ( 93 Pac. 135 ).

Finley v. State Industrial Accident Commission

141 Or. 138 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1932

Varrelman v. … Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 472 ( 114 N. E. 915 ), and Barragar v. Ind. Com. of Wis. 205 Wis. 550 ( 238 N. W. 368 , 78 A. L.

Patterson v. Portland Smelting Works

35 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1899

Co., 52 Fed. 680 ; Harts v. Brown, 77 Ill. 226 ; Illinois Steel Co. v. O’Donnell, 156 Ill. 624 (47 Am. St. Kep. 245, 41 N. E. 185 ); Forster v. Mullanphy Planing Mill Co., 16 Mo. App. 150 ; Twin Lick Oil Co. v. … . § 4071; Jameson v. Goldwell, 23 Or. 144 ( 31 Pac. 279 ); Jones v. Hale, 32 Or. 465 ( 52 Pac. 311 ); Wilkinson v. Bauerle, 41 N. J. Eq. 635 ( 7 Atl. 514 ). 8.

Ramstead v. Morgan

219 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1959

Kirkland, 298 Ill App 340, 18 NE2d 709 (1939) (statement before county Tax Appeal Board); *389 Kimball v. Ryan, 283 Ill App 456 (1936) (written objections submitted to Election Board); Haskell v. … Stim, 11 Misc2d 653, 176 NYS2d 475 (1958) (affidavit and letter by attorney to presiding Justice); Brown v.

Lupke v. School District No. 1

130 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1929

S.) 1026), was a case brought for slander against the school board by reason of their having desired to discharge a teacher for immoral conduct. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Piper

271 Or. 726 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1975

In Jenkins v. … But see In re DeSaulnier, 360 Mass 787, 279 NE2d 296, 307-08 (1972); Ransford v.

Johnson v. Warm Springs Irrigation Dist.

118 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1926

As stated in Weber v. Jordan Valley Irr. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Roberts v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission

215 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1958

Com’n v. Unionville Milling Co., 313 Mich 292 , 21 NW2d 135 ; Michigan Unemployment Comp. Com’n v. Appeal Board, 332 Mich 194 , 50 NW2d 755 ; Chester B. Brown Co. v. … Brown Co. v. United States, 152 F. Supp 803 . In the case at bar the commission found that title to the fruit was retained by the farmers.

State Ex Rel. Pierce v. Slusher

117 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1926

BROWN, J. This is an application for a writ of mandamus, by which it is sought to compel Harley J. … Board of Library Trustees, etc., 136 Cal. 403 , *502 405 ( 69 Pac. 88 ); Ross v. Board of Education, 18 Cal. App. 222 ( 122 Pac. 967 ); Dufton v. Daniels, 190 Cal. 577 ( 213 Pac. 949 ).

Toedtemeier v. Toedtemeier

137 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1931

Templeton on August 30, 1920, the purchaser assuming and agreeing to pay two mortgages aggregating $5,000, dated January 25, 1915, in favor of the State Land Board. On August 3,1921, S. Gr. … J., Brown and Rossman, JJ., concur.

Nelson v. United Railways Co.

85 Or. 427 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1917

"Whatever may be said as to its competency it was not of sufficient materiality upon which to base a reversal: Brown v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co., 63 Or. 396 ( 128 Pac. 38 ); Schulte v. … Co. v. Wortham, 73 Tex. 25 ( 10 S. W. 741 , 3 L. R. A. 368, and note); Missouri etc. R. Co. v. Sherrill, 32 Tex. Civ. App. 116 ( 72 S. W. 429 ). 3.