Case law

Vinson v. Brown

193 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1951

In mentioning those details, we have in mind the conditions described in Briggs v. John Yeon Co., 168 Or. 239, 246 , 122 P.2d 444, 448 . … In Briggs v. John Yeon Co., supra, this court said: “Nothing would he gained by reviewing cases from other jurisdictions cited by the defendant.

Brown v. McCloud

96 Or. 549 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1920

This has been the rule in this state since the rendition of the opinion in the case of French v. Cresswell, 13 Or. 418 ( 11 Pac. 62 , 17 Am. Neg. Cas. 217 ). This case was cited and followed in the cases of Bileu v. … A. 840); Strickland v. Geide, 31 Or. 373 ( 49 Pac. 982 ); and Pacific Livestock Co. v. Murray, 45 Or. 103, 107 ( 76 Pac. 1079 ).

White v. Brown

54 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1909

Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos County, 30 Or. 250 ( 47 Pac. 852 ). 2. … Griffin v. Pitman, 8 Or. 342 ; American B. & L. Ass’n v. Fulton, 21 Or. 492 ( 28 Pac. 636 ) ; Meinert v. Harder, 39 Or. 609 ( 65 Pac. 1056 ).

Brown v. Feldwert

46 Or. 363 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1905

This much is established by the cases cited by appellants: Green v. Wilkie, 98 Iowa, 74 ( 66 N. W. 1046 , 36 L. R. A. 434, 60 Am. St. Rep. 184 ); Shenandoah Nat. Bank v. Gravatte (Neb.), 95 N. W. 694 ; Keller v. … Rep. 974 ); Frederick v. Clemens, 60 Mo. 313 ; De Camp v. Hamma, 29 Ohio St. 467 . In Shirts v.

Brown v. Liquidators

152 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1935

The jury is not required to make such inference merely because they find there was a want of probable cause: Kellogg v. Ford, 70 Or. 213 ( 139 P. 751 ); Thienes v. Francis, 69 Or. 165, 169 ( 138 P. 490 ); 18 R. C. … J. 418, § 57; Shaw v. Moon, 117 Or. 558 ( 245 P. 318 , 45 A. L. R. 600).

Lane v. Brown

328 Or. 42 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1998

Lane v. Brown, 138 Or App 34 , 906 P2d 821 (1995). … Art VII (Amended), § 3 (“no *46 fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of this state, unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict”); Brown v. J. C.

Brown v. Fleischner

4 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1871

Marshall v. Brown

108 Or. 658 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1923

In Sayres v. Allen, 25 Or. 211, 214 *665 ( 35 Pac. 254, 255 ), Mr. … See, also, Maxwell v. Bolles, 28 Or. 1 ( 41 Pac. 611 ); Oregon Pottery Co. v. Kern, 30 Or. 328 ( 47 Pac. 917 ). Mr. Justice Moore also discussed the subject of cross-examination in Blue v. Portland Ry., L. & P.

Brown v. Johnston

258 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1971

As stated in Young v. … “Q Did you find all these symptoms in the twigs and leaves you received from the Browns ? “A Yes.”

Schomp v. Brown

215 Or. 714 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1959

It follows: “V. … Brown and her late husband, have acquired only a right of action to recover damages against the estate of Mrs. Brown if she fails by her last will and testament to fulfill her part of the agreement of 1950. Schramm v.

Brown v. Jones

130 Or. 424 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1929

See Turner v. Bachelder, 17 Me. 257 ; Dockham v. Parker, 9 Me. (9 Greenl.) 137 ( 23 Am. Dec. 547 ); Orcutt v. Moore, 134 Mass. 48 ( 45 Am. Rep. 278 ); Gulf C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Smith, 3 Tex. Civ. App. 483 ( 23 S. … Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

State v. Brown

245 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1966

See State v. LeBrun, 245 Or 265 , 419 P2d 948 (1966). Affirmed.

Brown v. Lewis

50 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1907

The ease of Brown v. Althouse Mining Co. was a transitory action against a foreign corporation. … Co. v. Marder, 50 Neb. 283 ( 69 N. W. 774 : 61 Am. St. Rep. 573 ); Griffin v. McGavin, 117 Mich. 372 ( 75 N. W. 1061 : 72 Am. St. Rep. 564 ). 3. The situation here is identical with the case of Farrell v.

State v. Brown

2 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1867

The decision in the Supreme Court of the case of Fox v. Ohio, 5; How., 410; 16 Curtis, 447; renders our labors essentially easier. … S. v. Marigold, 9 How., 560 ; 18 Curtis, 261; Moore v. Illinois, 14 How., 20 ; 20 Curtis, 6; and in the courts of the territory of Oregon, in Oregon v. Coleman, 1 Oregon, 191, the doctrine was clearly affirmed.

Stokes v. Brown

20 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1891

(Dodd v. Denny, 6 Or. 156 ; Henderson v. *534 Morris, 5 Or. 27 ; 1 Rumsey’s Prac. § 540; Catlin v. Gunter, 11 N. Y. 368 , 62 Am. Dec. 113 ; Place v. Minster, 65 N. Y. 89 ; Johnston H. Co. v. … Clark, 30 Minn. 308 ; Kopplekom v. Huffman, 12 Neb. 95 .)

Brown v. Webb

60 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1912

Johnson v. Okerstrom, 70 Minn. 303, 308 ( 73 N. W. 147 ); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233 ( 91 Pac. 453 ). Officers of Bank of Manchester v. Allen, 11 Vt. 303 , 306; 3 Enc. of Ev., p. 614; Methodist Church v. … Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 283 ( 91 Pac. 453 ). See, also, Trustees v. Froislie, 37 Minn. 447 ( 35 N. W. 260 ); Society Perun v. Cleveland, 43 Ohio St. 481 ( 3 N. E. 357 ); Methodist Church v. Picket, 23 Barb. (N.

Brown v. Portland

97 Or. 600 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1920

This is upon the theory that the prior reassessment involved in the case of Brown v. Portland, which we will refer to hereafter as the former case, was not held absolutely void or annulled. … (at page 1166 of 163 Pac.), the Chief Justice said: “Thereupon the city endeavored to make another reassessment, but this was resisted and adjudged invalid in Brown v.

Brown v. Truax

58 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1911

In Teel v. … It is urged that Brown stood by and permitted defendant to purchase the wood, and that thereby he is estopped from now claiming it, but no such estoppel is pleaded or proved.

State v. Brown

64 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1913

for reward or hire shall do any act of dentistry, without having filed for record and having recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county wherein he shall so practice or do such act a certificate from said board … State v. Carr, 6 Or. 133 ; State v. Miller, 54 Or. 381 ( 103 Pac. 519 ). 2, 3. It is claimed that Section 4780, L. O.

Silverton v. Brown

63 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1912

See Lais v. Smith, 63 Or. 206 ( 127 Pac. 26 ) ; Quinn v. Willamette Pulp & Paper Co., 62 Or. 549 ( 126 Pac. 1 ). We think this question was properly submitted to the jury. … Schooling v. Harrisburg, 42 Or. 494 ( 71 Pac. 605 ). 6, 7.