Case law

Graham v. Coos Bay R. & N. Co.

71 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1914

Brown, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ). 10. Under Section 704, L. O. … See, also, McIntosh v. McNair, 53 Or. 87 ( 99 Pac. 74 ); Craft v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. (C. C.), 62 Fed. 736 ; Brown v. Grossman (Sup.), 108 N. Y. Supp. 653 ; Herbert v.

Nehalem Timber Co. v. Columbia County

97 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1920

Howard, 14 Or. 39 ( 12 Pac. 79 ); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Higginbotham v. Frock, 48 Or. 129 ( 83 Pac. 536 , 120 Am. St. Rep. 796 ); Collins v. … In O’Hara v.

State v. Turnbow

99 Or. 270 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1920

Justice Brown alone. It became the unanimous decision of this court. To become effective, such objections, if any, should have been made at the time of the argument. … state, all causes or proceedings in the Supreme *291 Court, in which the state is a party or interested, when in his discretion the same may be necessary or advisable, and he shall, when requested by any state officer, board

Cook v. Cook

167 Or. 474 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1941

The State of Oregon, by its complaint in intervention, seeks to uphold the validity of the decree of divorce, thereby rendering such property subject to escheat to the State Land Board. … Rep. 104 ; Fritz v. Fritz , 6 Ohio N.P. 258 , 9 Ohio Dec. 274 ; Brown, et al. v. Grove , 116 Ind. 84 , 18 N.E. 387 , 9 Am. St. Rep. 823 ; Hill v. Victoria , 180 Iowa 417 , 161 N.W. 72 ; Wood v.

Ivy Ramsey v. Wellington Co.

114 Or. 355 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1925

See, also, Wilson v. Investment Co., 80 Or. 233 ( 156 Pac. 249 ); Bell & Co. v. Vogt, 87 Or. 102 ( 168 Pac. 724 ). … See, also, McKinney v. Hindman, 86 Or. 545 ( 169 Pac. 93 , 1 A. L. R. 1476).

State v. O'Key

321 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1995

4 Similarly, in Plemel v. Walter, 303 Or 262 , 735 P2d 1209 (1987), this court applied State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), in a civil case. … State v. Clowes, 310 Or 686 , 692 n 7, 801 P2d 789 (1990); Brown, 297 Or at 420 n 7.

Gerdetz v. Central Oregon Irr. Co.

83 Or. 576 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1917

In Smith v. Boston & Maine R. R. … In Brown v.

Nelson v. Baker

112 Or. 79 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1924

In the case of Ham v. Boston Board of Police, 142 Mass. 90 , at page 93 [ 7 N. … J. and Brown and Rand, JJ., concur. For the motion, Mr. Franh S. Grant and Mr. B. A. Imlay. Contra, Mr. John Manning.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hereford

306 Or. 69 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1988

ORS g^O). 1 The first and second causes relate to representation of clients named McKee and Brown. … On these claims, the trial panel found: “The direct testimony of both McKee and Brown established that the Accused was less than diligent in maintaining communications with, and failed to promote understanding with, these

Edwards v. Wirtz

167 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1941

Co. v. Frost, 146 Ark. 472 , 225 S. W. 645 ; Old Second Nat’l Bank *638 v. Alpena County Sav. Bank, supra; Chicago Blvd. Land Co. v. Apartment Garages, 245 Mich. 448 , 222 N. W. 697 . … Grider v. Turn-how, supra.

State v. Marrington

335 Or. 555 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2003

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). … See Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 331 Or 285, 304 , 14 P3d 596 (2000) (scientific evidence subject to requirements of Brown and O’Key even though science involved is not “hard” science). In State v.

Shaw v. Oswego Iron Co.

10 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1882

Chambers, 3 Ohio, 496; Benner v. Platter, 6 id., 505; Blanchard v. Porter, 11 id., 138; Walker v. Board of Public Works, 16 id., 540; June v. Purcell, 36 Ohio St., 396 ; Middleton v. … Prichard, 3 Scam., 510 ; Board of Trustees v. Hamen, 5 Gilman, 548 ; City of Chicago v. Laflin, 49 Ill., 117 ; Braxton v. Brusler, 64 Ill., 488 ; *380 Browne v. Kennedy, 5 H. & J., 195 ; Schurmeier v.

Fales v. Multnomah County

119 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1926

Bank v. Yamhill County, 110 Or. 74 ( 222 Pac. 1077 ); see, also, Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441, 451 ( 190 Pac. 971 ). … See Clark v. Hood River County, 73 Or. 336, 340 ( 143 Pac. 897 ).

Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. University of Oregon

332 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 2001

Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, 220 F3d 1165 , 1166 (9th Cir 2000). … Matthews v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education, 220 F3d 1165 , 1167 (9th Cir 2000).

Karn Et Ux v. Pidcock Et Ux

225 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1960

This general rule has been approved and applied in many Oregon cases since Scott v. Walton, supra, was decided. Ross v. Carlyle et ux., 216 Or 576 , 339 *411 P2d 1114; Brown et ux. v. … Brown et ux. v. Hassenstab et ux., supra; Weiss and Hamilton v. Gumbert, 191 Or 119 , 227 P2d 812 , 228 P2d 800 ; Sharkey v. Burlingame Co., 131 Or 185 , 282 P 546 .

School District No. 1 v. School District No. 45

148 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1934

Appealing defendants also cite the case of Board of Supervisors v. Brown, 146 Miss. 56 ( 111 So. 831 ). … Brown, supra.

Dreifus Lumber Co. v. Werner

221 Or. 467 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1960

Brown et ux. v. Hassenstab et ux., 212 Or 246, 253 , 319 P2d 929 ; Johnson et ux. v. Cofer, 204 Or 142, 149 , 281 P2d 981 ; Sharkey v. Burlingame Co., 131 Or 185, 197 , 282 P 546 . … See also Larsen et al. v.

Pacific Placer Co. v. Sparlin

102 Or. 60 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1921

Donnelly, 59 Or. 138 ( 116 Pac. 569 ); Caviness v. La Grande Irr. Co., 60 Or. 410, 430 ( 119 Pac. 731 ). 2. … J., and Brown, J., concur. Johns, J., resigned after argument.

Felger v. Robinson

3 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869

The allegation in the answer is, “that said Mary’s river was duly declared navigable for the purpose of floating logs by the Board of County Commissioners of the county of Benton, * * * in pursuance of law, etc., from said … (Moor v. Veazie, 32 Maine, 343; Treat v. Lord, 42 Maine, 552; Brown v. Scofield, 8 Barb. S. C. R. 243.) ■Such is now the settled law in those states that have adjudicated this question.

Robinette v. SAIF

369 Or. 767 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2022

See Caren, 365 Or at 472 (citing Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 283, 391 P3d 773 (2017)). … SAIF workers’ compensation statutes in response to this court’s decisions in the Barrett cases); see also Brown v.