Case law

Knox v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 699 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2018

Young v. Gard

129 Or. 534 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1929

Justice Brown in Twohy Brothers v. Ochoco Irr. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Webb v. Heintz

52 Or. 444 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1908

E. 271 ) ; Mayor, etc., of Birmingham v. Tayloe, 105 Ala. 170 ( 16 South. 576 ) ; West v. City of Eau Claire, 89 Wis. 31 ( 61 N. W. 313 ) ; Jennings v. Van Schaick, 108 N. Y. 530 ( 15 N. E. 424 : 2 Am. … Rep. 459 ) ; Brown v. Weaver (Pa.), 5 Atl. 32 . Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered. Reversed.

Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.

112 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1924

v. … The acts of the defendant, pretending to rely upon a void order of ’the water board, amounts to a continued trespass which equity is authorized to enjoin: Chapman v. Dean, 58 Or. 476 ( 115 Pac. 154 ); Stotts v.

Hand Manufacturing Co. v. Marks

36 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1900

Calvert v. Dock Co. is cited as opposed to this view; so, also, are the cases of Bragg v. Shain, 49 Cal. 135 ; Simonson v. Grant, 36 Minn. 439 ( 31 N. W. 861 ); Board of Commissioners v. Branham (C. … In Board of Commissioners v.

Mendacino v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2018

Hyde v. Albert E. Peirce & Co.

147 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1934

Merton v. Hansen, 200 Wis. 576 ( 229 N. W. 53 ), is a case wherein the statute provided that each town board shall grant licenses to such persons as they deem proper for the sale of nonintoxicating liquor. … Answer: ‘I think Bell sent it to Brown and Brown sent it to me. ’ “A. Mr. Fletcher, you are talking of two different things here.

Cooper v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

364 Or. 723 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2019

In re Riggs

105 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1922

BROWN, J. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal in the matter of the application of J. Alvin Riggs, C. H. Hardy and J. Gr. … Bank v.

Twist Architecture & Design, Inc. v. Oregon Board of Architect Examiners

361 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 2017

ated in PGE v. … See United States v.

Straub v. State of Oregon

121 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1927

Township Board of White Lake, 22 Mich. 349 .” This opinion is the rule and guide in this state. The language of Mr. Justice Belt used in the opinion of U’Ren v. … S.) 619); Crook v. Newborg, 124 Ala. 479 ( 82 Am. St. Rep. 190 , 27 South. 432 ); Brown v. Brown, 103 Kan. 53 ( 172 Pac. 1005 , L. R. A. 1918F, 1033).

State v. Scheidemann

252 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1968

That the address of 1444% Hilyard Street is an apartment and that it is presently listed with the Eugene Water and Electric Board as being in the name of Linda McCarl. … The affidavit discloses that the apartment sought to be searched was listed with the Eugene Water and Electric Board in the name of Linda McCarl.

Penn v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

363 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2018

Barrett v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

363 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2018

White v. Public Employees Retirement Board and State of Oregon (Certified Appeal Accepted)

Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 18, 2011

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS, MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS February 18, 2011 White et al v. … Public Employees Retirement Board and State of Oregon et al (A142773). Certified appeal accepted.

School Dist. No. 106 v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

132 Or. 673 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1930

*675 BROWN, J. … The consent to any particular measure obtained of individual members •when not in session is not an act of the board, and is not binding upon the district.” See Taggart v.

Tinsley v. Lombard

46 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1904

Brown, 23 Cal. 142 ; Cartwright v. Cartwright, 68 Ill. App. 74 ; Board v. Presbyterian Church, 19 Wash. 455 ( 53 Pac. 671 ); Ewell v. Daggs, 108 U. S. 143 (2 Sup. Ct. 408); Sanger v. Nightingale, 122 U. S. 176 (7 Sup. … Ct. 1109); Blair v. Silver Peak Mines (C. C.), 84 Fed. 737 ; Hanchett v. Blair, 100 Fed. 817 ( 41 C. C. A. 76 ).

Nehalem Timber Co. v. Columbia County

97 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1920

Howard, 14 Or. 39 ( 12 Pac. 79 ); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Higginbotham v. Frock, 48 Or. 129 ( 83 Pac. 536 , 120 Am. St. Rep. 796 ); Collins v. … In O’Hara v.

Cook v. Cook

167 Or. 474 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1941

The State of Oregon, by its complaint in intervention, seeks to uphold the validity of the decree of divorce, thereby rendering such property subject to escheat to the State Land Board. … Rep. 104 ; Fritz v. Fritz , 6 Ohio N.P. 258 , 9 Ohio Dec. 274 ; Brown, et al. v. Grove , 116 Ind. 84 , 18 N.E. 387 , 9 Am. St. Rep. 823 ; Hill v. Victoria , 180 Iowa 417 , 161 N.W. 72 ; Wood v.

Knox v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

362 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2018