Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
3.34s
373 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2025
Brown v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, 372 Or 225, 227, 548 P3d 817 (2024). … Halperin v.
Cited 4 timesPublished354 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 2013
See, e.g., State v. … See Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 693, 159 P3d 1151 (2007). A different strand of case law also informs the under- standing of the grand jury provision that the voters adopted in 1974.
Cited 28 timesPublished237 Or. 204 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1964
Brown, Grants Pass, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was R. Gene Smith, Grants Pass. Before ROSSMAN, Presiding Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices. AFFIRMED. … Guthrie v.
Cited 25 timesPublished337 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 2004
A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused committed the alleged violations and imposed a one-year suspension (with nine months stayed pending satisfactory compliance with conditions described below … See Stevens v. Bispham, 316 Or 221, 227 , 851 P2d 556 (1993) (describing elements of legal malpractice claim).
Cited 10 timesPublishedYeatts v. Polygon Northwest Co.
360 Or. 170 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2016
In Saylor v. … In Wienke v.
Cited 21 timesPublished35 Or. 420 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1899
Ct. 98); Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206 Sharp v. Speir, 4 Hill, 76 ; Miller v. City of Amsterdam, 149 N. Y. 288 ( 43 N. E. 632 ). 3. … Scott that no resolution was passed by the board of directors of the company authorizing the signing; and this, it is contended, is sufficient to show that Mr.
Cited 21 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Spencer
335 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2002
A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated only DR 1-102(A)(3) and determined that the appropriate sanction was suspension from the practice of law for 60 days. … See State v. Keenan /Waller, 307 Or 515, 519 , 771 P2d 244 (1989) (DR 4-101(A) “does not confine the client’s ‘secrets’ to communications; indeed, they may reach the attorney from someone other than the client”).
Cited 11 timesPublishedCity of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2016
See generally Copeland v. … See Storer Cable Communications v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPorter v. United States National Bank
192 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1951
In the light of the decision in Newman v. … “ARTICLE V “I hereby nominate and appoint my friend DAVID L.
Cited 3 timesPublished154 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1936
In Foot v. … Heike v. United States, 227 U. S. 131, 144 ; Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591, 599, 600 . In The Queen v. Boyes (1861), 1 B. & S. 311, 329, 330, Cockburn, C.
Cited 10 timesPublishedLevel 3 Communications, LLC v. Dept. of Rev.
368 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2021
R. v. … And in DISH Network Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished367 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 2021
We know the way he drives and, you know, we’re—we’re going to bring your name up to the Board.’ And so I thought I might have to move for a while.” … See, e.g., State v.
Cited 67 timesPublished367 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 2020
See State v. … See State v.
Cited 30 timesPublished186 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1949
v. … Codman v. Evans, 1 Allen, 443 . Gould v. Eastern Railroad, 142 Mass. 85 . Gould v. Wagner, 196 Mass. 270 . It was said by Holmes,.J., in Crocker v.
Cited 8 timesPublished94 Or. 432 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1919
Brown, 28 Or. 147, 158 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ); 21 Cyc. 898. … In State v.
Cited 27 timesPublished355 Or. 144 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2014
See Garrison v. … Praggastis v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHagey v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
169 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1942
Brown , 37 Or. 588 , 61 P. 1024 ; Brenner v. Alexander , 16 Or. 349 , 19 P. 9 , 8 Am. St. Rep. 301 ; Pomeroy on Equity Jurisprudence, pp. 538-542 and p. 2459. … It is safe to assume that in each of them (especially Durfee v. Abbott, Schwartz v. Schwartz , and Aetna Casualty Co. v.
Cited 16 timesPublished352 Or. 46 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 2012
See Blacknall v. … In Estelle v.
Cited 7 timesPublished326 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1997
In Terry v. … Brown, 24 F3d 1223, 1226 (10th Cir 1994) (30-minute detention of car for dog-sniff was reasonable); United States v.
Cited 61 timesPublished
Ask Donna