Case law

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Obert

352 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 2012

(OSB 08-134, 09-122, 09-123; SC S059072) On review of the decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board. Argued and submitted March 9, 2012. … First, in the Wilson matter, the 3 accused fully and freely disclosed all relevant information to the disciplinary board and 4 fully cooperated with that investigation. ABA Standard 9.32(e).

State v. Kreis

365 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2019

v. … A.G. v.

City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.

359 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2016

See Lincoln Loan Co. v. … See generally Copeland v.

Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

284 Or. 453 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1978

Flinn, of Flinn, Lake & Brown, Eugene, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant/cross-respondent. Peter L. … In the case of Roshak v.

Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.

207 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1956

On the bulletin board at Camp 5, wasn’t there a notice posted that the company would furnish transportation to the woods or they could take their own private vehicles? “THE COURT: As of what time are you speaking Mr. … In Stark v.

Powell v. Powell

181 Or. 675 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1947

Devereaux v. Cocherline, — Or. —, 170 P. (2d) 727, 733 ; Myers v. Olds, 121 Or. 249 , 252 P. 842 ; Eilers Music House v. Reine, 65 Or. 598 , 133 P. 788 . … Brennen v. Derby, 124 Or. 574, 581 , 265 P. 425 ; Roardman v. Harding, 63 Or. 122 , 126 P. 993 ; Farrin v. Matthews, 62 Or. 517 , 124 P. 675 , 41 L. R. A., N. S. 184; Losey v.

State v. Stevens

311 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1991

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 350 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). On February 26, 1988, at about 3:30 p.m., defendant arrived at a friend’s house in Creswell. Ms. … In State v.

State v. Mains

295 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1983

In State v. … In State v.

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Flagg

189 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1950

Brown, City Attorney, of Portland, and Marian C. Rushing, Deputy City Attorney, of Portland, filed a brief as amici curiae. REVERSED. LUSK, C.J. … "V.

Kinkel v. Persson

363 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 10, 2018

McKinley v. … State , 175 So.3d 675 , 680 (Fla. 2015) (holding that an aggregate 90-year sentence for sexual battery and robbery violated Graham ); Brown v.

State v. Thompson

328 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1999

State v. … See State v.

Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.

97 Or. 263 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1920

of the expected testimony of those desired witnesses, counsel for the plaintiff remarked to the jury in substance that the statement of one of the witnesses was not taken before a proper tribunal, but was taken before a board … And, as said in O’Brien v.

Dunning v. Northwestern Electric Co.

186 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1948

In Brown v. … We believe that the correct rule was also employed in Moore v. Stetson Mach. Works, 110 Wash. 649 , 188 P. 769 , and Brown v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co., 79 Cal. App. 2d 613 , 180 P. 2d 424 . See also 31 C. J.

Figueroa v. BNSF Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 2017

See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 US 915, 919, 131 S Ct 2846, 180 L Ed 2d 796 (2011) (defining those terms). … PGE v.

Scott v. Kesselring

370 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 2022

And it’s right here on this board. It is the law. And is the jury instruction you will 8 Scott v. … State v.

City of Klamath Falls v. Winters

289 Or. 747 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1980

Supreme Court has "rejected costs as a distinguishing factor," citing Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Burns v. Ohio, 360 U.S. 252 , 79 S.Ct. 1164 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1209 (1959); Griffin v. … Reed v.

Weisensee v. Hoyt

220 Or. 159 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1959

Doneen v. Craven, Executor et al, supra, 204 Or 524 . In this case we cannot say that the will was unnatural from the point of view of the testatrix, Gertrude. … State Land Board v. Sovenko et al, 202 Or 571, 581 , 277 P2d 781 .

North Pacific Lumber Co. v. Oliver

286 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1979

The assessing by plaintiff of additional charges of $15 per thousand board feet for resurfacing lumber, which resurfacing in fact is not done or required. 6. … In Smith v.

State v. Guzek

322 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1995

State v. … Multnomah County Board of Commissioners, 318 Or 302, 309 , 865 P2d 356 (1994) (citing Colby v. Larson, 208 Or 121, 126-27 , 297 P2d 1073 , 299 P2d 1076 (1956)).

Clatsop County v. Taylor

167 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1941

Brown, 45 Cal. App. 205 , 187 P. 133 ; and 4 C. J., Appearances, § 47, p. 1358. The above-mentioned principles of law are applicable to suits for the foreclosure of tax liens: State v. … In Kelly v.