Case law

Smitson v. Southern Pacific Co.

37 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1900

Co. v. … Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ) it was held that an instruction stating that there is evidence “to the effect” or “tending to show” a certain fact in issue, but leaving to the jury the finding of such fact, did not contravene

State v. Cox

337 Or. 477 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2004

See Rogers, 330 Or at 301-02 (recognizing that rights under Article I, section 11, are subject to reasonable limitations); Brown v. … See State v.

Blanchana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor and Industries

354 Or. 676 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 2014

See Trebesch v. … Coffey v. Board of Geologist Examiners, 348 Or 494, 502-06, 235 P3d 686 (2010) (so analyzing agency action). In that regard, the agency’s interpretation of the statute is not enti- tled to deference on review.

Martinson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

154 Or. 423 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1936

as follows: Respondent, Grant Smith-Porter Ship Company, at and prior to the time of libelant’s injury was engaged in constructing steam vessels for the United States government under contract with United States Shipping Board … Dept. of Labor, supra; Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, supra; Dewey Fish Co. v. Dept. of Labor, supra. In Woodworth v. Ind. Acc.

Birkemeier v. Knobel

149 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1934

Justice Bean in Pippy v. … They do not affect the time for filing a lien notice: Avery v. Butler, 30 Or. 287 ( 47 P. 706 ).

Hansen v. Bussman

274 Or. 757 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1976

Kulm v. … See also Brown v. Johnston, 258 Or 284, 293 , 482 P2d 712 (1971); Ditty v.

Smiley v. ACKERMAN

196 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1952

This listing was in writing upon a form approved by the Portland Realty Board. We now digress a moment for the purpose of disclosing the part which the defendants Clanssen played in the transaction. … In 17 CJS, Contracts, 921, § 439, it is stated: *394 See also Milton v. Hare et al., 130 Or 590 , 280 P 511 ; Rayburn et al. v.

Ragsdale v. Department of Revenue

321 Or. 216 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1995

In Hughes v. … Davis v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kumley

335 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2003

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board determined that the accused had committed all three charged violations and suspended him from the practice of law for 12 months. … We find by clear and convincing evidence that the accused violated ORS 9.160. *651 V. SANCTION We now must determine the appropriate sanction.

State v. Colgrove

370 Or. 474 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2022

See Ogle v. … Brown, 225 Or App 207, 208, 199 P3d 890 (2009) (acceptance of an involuntary plea); State v.

David v. Portland Water Committee

14 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1886

In Brandon v. … Thus, in Atkins v.

State v. Ryan

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 2017

: Implications of Graham v. Florida, Roper v. Simmons, and Atkins v. … McAdory, 334 F3d 665, 668 n 1 (7th Cir 2003), cert den, 541 US 992 (2004) (same); People v. Brown, 2012 Ill App 091940, 967 NE 2d 1004, 1022 (Ill App), rev den, 981 NE2d 995 (2012), cert den sub nom Brown v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lawrence

332 Or. 502 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2001

Samsone v. United States, 380 US 343, 354 , 85 S Ct 1004 , 13 L Ed 2d 882 (1965). … See, e.g., United States v.

Oregon Liquor Control Commission v. Coe

163 Or. 646 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1940

C.) 212 F. 348 , Cochran v. Leister, 2 Root (Conn.) 348; Spaulding v. Swift, 18 Vt. 214 ; Norwood v. Dodge, 215 Mass. 351 , 102 N. E. 412 (by rule of court); Upham v. Bradley, 17 Me. 423 (semble); Lucas v. … State v.

United States National Bank v. First National Bank

172 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1943

Cas. 563 (1907); Stark v. Conde , 100 Wis. 633 , 76 N.W. 600 (1898); Perry v. Brown , 34 R.I. 203 , 83 A. 8 (1912); Fisher v. Fisher , 80 Neb. 145 , 113 N.W. 1004 (1907). … Handley v. Palmer , 91 F. 948 (1899); Washington Loan Trust Co. v. Hammond , 278 F. 569 (1922); Carley v.

Bergmann v. Hutton

337 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 2004

Brown, Portland. Meagan A. Flynn, of Preston Bunnell & Stone, LLP, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association. *354 GILLETTE, J. … See Vega v. Farmers Ins.

State v. Wagner

305 Or. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1988

See Rise v. Board of Parole, 304 Or 385, 396 , 745 P2d 1210 (1987) (Linde, J., concurring). … State v. Hightower, 214 NJ Super 43, 518 A2d 482 (1986). See also People v.

In Re Jaffee

331 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2000

The proceedings are before this court on briefs submitted by the Oregon State Bar and on the record made before two trial panels of the Disciplinary Board. … 1998 amended formal complaint alleged: "On or about September 13, 1991, judgment was entered in favor of the United States of America against the Accused in the amount of $13,625, in the matter of United States of America v.

Closset v. Burtchaell

112 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1924

The case comes within the principle announced in Brown v. Williams, 5 R. … In Roe v. Griffiths, 1 Blackst. R. 605, Lord Mansfield said that, in Selwyn v.

Kuhns v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., Western Oper.

257 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1970

In Stout v. … Since the decision in Stout v. Madden, this court decided the case of Dewey v. A. F.