Case law

Arellano-Sanchez v. Thrasher

374 Or. 623 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2025

State v. Klein, 352 Or 302, 309, 283 P3d 350 (2012) (citing State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72, 206 P3d 1042 (2009)). … Bonner v. American Golf Corp. of California, 372 Or 814, 844, 558 P3d 812 (2024); Westwood Homeowners Assn., Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Kane v. Goldschmidt

308 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1989

As noted in DeFazio v. … Barron, 164 NW2d 607 (SD 1969); State v. Giessel, 271 Wis 15, 72 NW2d 577 (1955); Texas Nat. Guard Armory Board v. McCraw, 126 SW2d 627 (Tex 1939). But see Witzenburger v. State ex rel.

State v. Langley

314 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1992

ORAP 5.45(2); see State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (discussing requirements for satisfying ORAP 5.45(2)). We will not consider the constitutional objections for the first time on appeal. … See State v.

Flanagan v. Flanagan

188 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1949

L. 1949, ch. 154); Neely v. Neely , 162 Or. 610 , 94 P.2d 300 ; Goodman v. Goodman , 165 Or. 141 , 149 , 105 P.2d 1091 ; Sabot v. Sabot , 97 Wn. 395 , 166 P. 624 ; 17 Am. Jur., Divorce and Separation, § 49, p. 174. … In discussing the question of alimony, we said in Siebert v.

Santiam Fish & Game Ass'n v. State Tax Commission

229 Or. 506 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1962

If it turns out upon computation that they are such a source over a substantial enough period to justify the conclusion that this is deliberate, we agree with the Board that the club is making earnings which ‘inure to the … We refer to Koon Kreek Klub v.

Wyckoff v. Mutual Life Insurance

173 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1944

Co. v. Maddox , 221 Ala. 292 , 128 So. 383 ; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Beason , 229 Ala. 140 , 155 So. 530 ; Mitchell v. Industrial Commission of Ohio , 135 Ohio St. 110 *Page 600 19 N.E.2d 769 ; Brown v. … Co. v.

Libertarian Party of Oregon v. Roberts

305 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1988

See State v. … Oregon Republican Party v.

Denton v. Arnstein

197 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1952

Hawks v. Slusher, 55 Or 1, 4 , 104 P 883 ; Mooney v. Carter, 114 Colo 267, 160 P2d 390, 393 ; Ruter v. Foy, 46 Iowa 132 ; Aiken v. Holyoke Street Railway, 184 Mass 269, 272, 68 NE 238 ; Kasanovich v. … In Mooney v.

MacPherson v. Department of Administrative Services

340 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2006

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). Plaintiffs’ claims involve present facts. … See United States v.

Bernards v. Link

199 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1953

Wason v. … Dillon v.

STATE EX REL. DHS v. Rardin

338 Or. 399 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2005

State ex rel SOSCF v. Stillman, 333 Or. 135, 145-46 , 36 P.3d 490 (2001). … State ex rel SOSCF v. Blum, 175 Or.App. 447, 459 , 28 P.3d 1231 (2001); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v.

Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.

194 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1952

Cunningham v. … Instances in which blackboard testimony provoked comment are Dryer v. Brown, 52 Hun 321 ; State v. Ryno, 68 Kan 348, 74 P 1114 , 64 LRA 303. See, also, Rachmel v.

Security Bank v. Chiapuzio

304 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1987

Howes v. Sherlock, 233 Or 429 , 378 P2d 713 (1963); 4 see also Citizens Valley Bank v. Prahl/Benton Co., 11 Or App 97 , 502 P2d 284 (1972). In Pederson v. … Lathrop v.

City of Klamath Falls v. Winters

289 Or. 757 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1980

Supreme Court has "rejected costs as a distinguishing factor,” citing Lane v. Brown, 372 US 477 , 83 S Ct 768 , 9 LEd 2d 892 (1963); Burns v. Ohio, 360 US 252 , 79 S Ct 1164 , 3 LEd 2d 1209(1959); Griffin v. … No. 12 v.

Smitson v. Southern Pacific Co.

37 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1900

Co. v. … Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ) it was held that an instruction stating that there is evidence “to the effect” or “tending to show” a certain fact in issue, but leaving to the jury the finding of such fact, did not contravene

Kohring v. Ballard

355 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2014

See, e.g., Canter v. … Felton, 350 Or 592, 626-27, 260 P3d 448 (2011) (considering statements made by the Chair of the Board of Parole, proponent of the bill at issue); Snider v.

State v. Cox

337 Or. 477 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 2004

See Rogers, 330 Or at 301-02 (recognizing that rights under Article I, section 11, are subject to reasonable limitations); Brown v. … See State v.

Health Net, Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue

362 Or. 700 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2018

V. … In Tarlow v.

Birkemeier v. Knobel

149 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1934

Justice Bean in Pippy v. … They do not affect the time for filing a lien notice: Avery v. Butler, 30 Or. 287 ( 47 P. 706 ).

Hansen v. Bussman

274 Or. 757 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1976

Kulm v. … See also Brown v. Johnston, 258 Or 284, 293 , 482 P2d 712 (1971); Ditty v.