Case law

Coe v. Coe

75 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1915

Get into a cheap boarding-house and look around and find some light job which will make you self-sustaining and remain out of the country. You could do no good here. Carey agrees with us in this matter.” Dr. … The foregoing comprises all the testimony tending to establish a resulting trust, and, as between husband and wife, we think the evidence is insufficient for that purpose: Parker v.

Chrisman v. Cherisman

16 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1888

(Sulton v. Saddler, 36 Barb. 87 ; Wallis v. Hodgeson, 2 Atk. 56; Ogle v. Cook, 1 Ves. Sr. 177; Jackson v. Hesketh, 2 Stark. 518; Fulton v. Andrew, Law R. 7 H. L. 448; 12 Moak E. R. 76; Hodges v. Holder, 3 Camp. 366.) … ’’ (Harrison v. Rowan, 3 Wash. C. C. 580 ; Redfield Am. Cases on Wills, 53; Rice v. Rice, 50 Mich. 448 ; Freeman v. Easly, 117 Ill. 317 ; Will of Blakeley, 48 Wis. 294 ; Brinkman v. Rueggesick, 71 Me. 553 ; Brown v.

Jefferis v. Marzano

298 Or. 782 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1985

Jefferis v. … Jefferis v. Marzano, 67 Or App 527 , 678 P2d 781 (1984). Plaintiff did not seek review of this ruling. 2 As we said in Creasey v.

McIntire v. Forbes

322 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1996

See State ex rel Kane v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982).

Hagan v. Gemstate Manufacturing, Inc.

328 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1999

Indem. v. … Society *549 of Automotive Engineers Technical Board Recommendations Covering Rear Bumpers on Trucks and Trailers (1947).

W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. National Restaurant Supply Co.

266 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1973

Ford Motor Co., 308 Mass 558, 33 NE2d 318, 324 (1941); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. McGoldrick, 279 NY 184, 18 NE2d 25, 27 (1938); and Meyer v. State Board of Equalization, 42 Cal 2d 376, 267 P2d 257, 261 (1954). … Ass’n v. Public Util.

In Re Shanks' Estate

168 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1942

App. (2d) *663 738, 78 P. (2d) 456 ; Stevens v. Myers, 62 Or. 372, 391 , 121 P. 434 , 126 P. 29 . … fact that the decedent no longer had the income which he had formerly received as a railway fireman, it is not surprising that he worried about household expenses and that he wanted his wife to keep down the cost of her board

Nevada Ditch Co. v. Bennett

30 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1896

Justice Moore, in Low v. … See also Hindman v. Rizor, 21 Or. 112 ( 27 Pac. 13 ). In Conant v.

Mattson v. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc.

301 Or. 407 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1986

Raymond v. Flavel, 27 Or 219 , 40 P 158 (1895); Bowman v. Metzger, 27 Or 23 , 39 P 3 (1895). … In Minniti v.

Rose Et Ux. v. Denn Et Ux.

188 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1949

Lane County , 141 Or. 580 , 18 P.2d 594 ; Fendall v. Miller , 99 Or. 610 , 196 P. 381 ; Tucker v. Nuding , 92 Or. 319 , 180 P. 903 ; Brown v. Kemp , 46 Or. 517 , 81 P. 236 . … Nothing said in Malsch v.

Traver v. Naylor

126 Or. 193 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1928

Oliver, 32 Or. 447 ( 52 Pac. 176 ); Richardson v. *206 Orth, 40 Or. 252 ( 66 Pac. 925 ); Kelley v. Devin, 65 Or. 211 ( 132 Pac. 535 ); Woods v. Dunn, 81 Or. 457 ( 159 Pac. 1158 ); Mathews v. … Justice Lord in Wimer v.

Haas v. Holman

143 Or. 141 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1933

Morse v. Morse, 85 N. Y. 53 ; Robert v. Corning, supra; Ward v. Ward, 105 N. Y. 68 ; Mee v. Gordon, 187 N. Y. 400 ; Putnam v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co., 191 N. Y. 166, 182 ; Striker v. Daly, 223 N. Y. 468 , 472”. … The first of these precedents is Brown v. Fletcher, 235 U. S. 589 ( 35 S. Ct. 154 , 59 L.

Kinzua Resources v. DEQ

366 Or. 674 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2020

See, e.g., Penn v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 607, 627, 451 P3d 589 (2019) (discussing framework for when court will and will not defer to agency interpreta- tion of statute); Coos Waterkeeper v. … See State v.

Benson v. Keller

37 Or. 120 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1900

In Attorney-General v. … Co. v. McFarlan, 31 N. J.

State v. Wilson

323 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1996

See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (discussing when this court will exercise its discretion to review unpreserved errors). Accordingly, we will not consider this argument on the merits. … Pointer v.

James v. Carnation Co.

278 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1977

Layng, 273 Or 1 , 539 P2d 1047 (1975), were applied across the board is apparent when ORS 483.303 (as it existed prior to July 1,1976) is compared with ORS 483.362(1). … See Grimes v.

Dawson v. Pogue

18 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1888

Greenbaum v. Millsaps, 77 Mo. 474 ; Connolly v. Davidson, 15 Minn. 520 ( Gil. 428 ); Aldrich v. Palmer, 24 Cal. 513 ; Killips v. Insurance Co., 28 Wis. 472 ; Wolfe v. Tyler, 1 Heisk. 313 ; Insurance Co. v. … Sturges, 12 Heisk. 339 ; Brown v. Forest, 1 Wash. T. 201.

State v. Black

364 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 2019

In State v. … See State v.

State v. Simons

193 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1951

Groby v. State, supra, 109 Ohio St 543, 143 NE 126, 128 ; State v. Gerritson, supra, 124 Or 525, 530 , 265 P 422 ; State v. … Kneeland v.

Rennie v. Freeway Transport

294 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1982

And, although a court may be able to preserve part of a plaintiffs claim for subsequent litigation by expressly omitting any decision with regard to it in the first judgment (see Western Baptist Home Mission Board v. … See, e.g., Rosado v.