Case law

Dearborn v. Real Estate Agency

334 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 2002

No. 509-J v. FDAB, 311 Or 389 , 393 n 7, 812 P2d 1384 (1991) (unchallenged findings of fact in agency order are considered to be facts for purposes of judicial review). … It contends that the provision must be read in the context of ORS 670.280, which provides: *503 “Except as provided in ORS 342.143 or 342.175, no licensing board shall deny, suspend or revoke an occupational or professional

Service v. Sumpter Valley Ry. Co.

88 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1918

In Greenbrier County v. Livesay, 6 W. Va. 44 , Live-say and others sued to compel the board of supervisors of Greenbrier County to admit them to seats in that body. … Pending an appeal by the supervisors the board was abolished by constitutional provision and the Supreme Court abated the suit. In La Pointe v. O’Malley, 471 Wis. 332 ( 2 N.

State v. York

291 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1981

Lewis v. … Weatherford v.

Bagley v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.

356 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2014

Bliss v. … Bagley v.

Figueroa v. BNSF Railway Co.

361 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 2017

PGE v. … See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 US 915, 919 , 131 S Ct 2846 , 180 L Ed 2d 796 (2011) (defining those terms).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Cobb

345 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 2008

See Bales v. Commissioner, 58 TCM (CCH) 431, 445 (1989) (tax court concluded that Hoyt business was “a quality operation”). … In Brown , the trial court’s rules and its numerous written requests were directed specifically to the accused, not to his client. Here, the court’s rule and its one order required action by Hoyt.

Morgan v. Portland Traction Co.

222 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1958

In United States v. … In Takus v.

Johnson v. Gibson

358 Or. 624 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 2016

McPherson, Mersereau Shannon, LLP, Portland, filed the brief for amici curiae League of Oregon Cities, Association of Oregon Counties, Citycounty Insurance Services, Oregon School Boards Association, Special Districts Association … For instance, in Gearin v.

Homestyle Direct, LLC v. Department of Human Services

354 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2013

See, e.g., Forelaws on Board v. Energy Fac. … .”); Trebesch v.

State v. Eggers

372 Or. 789 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2024

See State v. … State v.

Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v. Lemon

345 Or. 334 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2008

See Davis v. Board of Parole, 341 Or 442, 448 , 144 P3d 931 (2006) (declining to decide issue when neither party had an interest in it). 2 Tenants raise another issue on review. Relying on Executive Mgt. Corp. v. … McCarthy v.

Rea v. Rea

195 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1952

Scott v. … Brown v. Irwin, Executrix, 187 Or 462 , 212 P2d 729 .

Coates v. Smith

81 Or. 556 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1916

See Evarts v. Steger, 5 Or. 147 ; Lewis v. Lewis, 5 Or. 169; Stephens v. Murton, 6 Or. 193 ; McCoy v. Bayley, 8 Or. 196 ; Foster v. Schmeer, 15 Or. 363 ( 15 Pac. 626 ); Hyland v. … To uphold the certificate is tantamount to saying that Jones can acknowledge as his own a deed purporting to be that of Brown so as to bind the latter and furnish record notice to his creditors.

Work v. Dep't of Revenue

363 Or. 745 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 2018

State v. Gaines , 346 Or. 160 , 171-72, 206 P.3d 1042 (2009). … See ORS 308.205(1) ; Dept. of Rev. v. River's Edge Investments, LLC , 359 Or. 822 , 825, 377 P.3d 540 (2016).

State v. Isom

313 Or. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1992

See State v. … In State v.

Chrisman v. Cherisman

16 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1888

(Sulton v. Saddler, 36 Barb. 87 ; Wallis v. Hodgeson, 2 Atk. 56; Ogle v. Cook, 1 Ves. Sr. 177; Jackson v. Hesketh, 2 Stark. 518; Fulton v. Andrew, Law R. 7 H. L. 448; 12 Moak E. R. 76; Hodges v. Holder, 3 Camp. 366.) … ’’ (Harrison v. Rowan, 3 Wash. C. C. 580 ; Redfield Am. Cases on Wills, 53; Rice v. Rice, 50 Mich. 448 ; Freeman v. Easly, 117 Ill. 317 ; Will of Blakeley, 48 Wis. 294 ; Brinkman v. Rueggesick, 71 Me. 553 ; Brown v.

Coe v. Coe

75 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1915

Get into a cheap boarding-house and look around and find some light job which will make you self-sustaining and remain out of the country. You could do no good here. Carey agrees with us in this matter.” Dr. … The foregoing comprises all the testimony tending to establish a resulting trust, and, as between husband and wife, we think the evidence is insufficient for that purpose: Parker v.

McIntire v. Forbes

322 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1996

See State ex rel Kane v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982).

Wilson v. City of Medford

107 Or. 624 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1923

As we pointed out in Colby v. … City of Medford, 85 Or. 485, 525 ( 167 Pac. 487 ); Brown v. Silverton, 97 Or. 441, 454 ( 190 Pac. 971 ).

In Re Shanks' Estate

168 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1942

App. (2d) *663 738, 78 P. (2d) 456 ; Stevens v. Myers, 62 Or. 372, 391 , 121 P. 434 , 126 P. 29 . … fact that the decedent no longer had the income which he had formerly received as a railway fireman, it is not surprising that he worried about household expenses and that he wanted his wife to keep down the cost of her board